Under the headline "Time to Ditch Kyoto," they call on delegates heading for the United Nations climate meeting in Bali in December to "radically rethink climate policy" and warn against creating a "bigger" version of Kyoto with more stringent targets and timetables.
Kyoto is a "symbolically important expression" of governments' concerns about climate change, they say: "But as an instrument for achieving emissions reductions it has failed. It has produced no demonstrable reduction in emissions or even in anticipated emissions growth. And it pays no more than token attention to the needs of societies to adapt to existing climate change." (On Monday, an international team reported humans are pumping more greenhouse gases than ever into the atmosphere, and warned the ever-increasing emissions will speed a planetary meltdown.)
....
What is needed is a massive increase in spending on clean-energy technologies, say Prins and Rayner, who want energy research and development placed on "wartime footing."
"It seems reasonable to expect the world's leading economies and emitters to devote as much money to this challenge as they currently spend on military research - in the case of the United States about $80 billion a year."
An equal amount should go toward global adaptation efforts, they say.
....
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=a84b068a-5920-4882-b974-5ee39e4aa219
Note: http://www.canada.com/t...

Agreed, although I don't agree with the policies of the like of GW Bush or Harper and so on, nor do I agree with their real motives for opposing Kyoto.
" ... and has not decreased CO2 or GHG."
Well to be fair, it's not actually operational yet now is it?
"There is only one way to fix the problem we are in and that is get rid of the internal combustion engine! period ... case closed"
That pretty much sums it all up, yes.
internal combustion engine! period ... case closed"
So there really is no way to fix the problem. I watched two Canadian electric car
companies on the news last night talking about closing doors and or moving out
of Canada because they are not getting any support from our government. This
is the first time I'd ever heard anything about two electric car companies
operating in Canada on the news!
---
"The most sustainable product is the one you never bought in the first place."
Alex Steffan
<br />
What about the really cool car built in India, that runs totally on compressed air?<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.theaircar.com/howitworks.html">http://www.theaircar.com/howitworks.html</a><br />
<br />
You could recharge at home! Everyone touts Hydrogen as 'the big thing', but this could be far better!<p>---<br>The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.<br />
Electric cars don't help either for the same reason.
In theory, both methods can help to some degree perhaps, because these vehicles run out of power quickly and are not as convenient to use, so they won't be used as much, but that's a silly way to solve a problem. You'll have to force people to use these vehicles over more practical ones, like they want to do with light bulbs.
Electric cars don't help either for the same reason. "
The same can be said of hydrogen, but hydrogen can't easily be made or stored at someone's home. Compressed air can. ('can' get it?)
Compressed air holds that advantage over hydrogen, plus it fits easily into current infrastructure.
---
The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.