Others Had To Know Of The Air India Threat

Posted on Saturday, May 05 at 11:10 by 4Canada
On the surface, the lieutenant-governor's unprecedented testimony before former Supreme Court justice John Major's Air India inquiry this week seems simply bizarre. If Bartleman knew that the government had been told before the bombings that a terror attack was imminent, why did he wait 22 years before going public? Certainly, the attack itself was dramatic enough. On June 23, 1985, bombs loaded onto two Air India aircraft flying out of Vancouver killed 331 people – 329 aboard eastbound Flight 182, and two Tokyo airport workers unloading baggage from a westbound flight. Yet, apparently, even as controversy swirled after the attack, Bartleman said nothing to anyone. His explanation is not entirely satisfactory. He says he was out of the country after 1985 and not following the case closely. He also says he did notify a senior RCMP officer just minutes after he read the warning – passed on to him by the Communications Security Establishment – but can't remember the man's name. He told reporters yesterday that he decided to speak up in 2005 only after he read that the government was planning a formal inquiry. But he didn't act until the following spring when, by happenstance, he ran into the inquiry's chief counsel as both men were walking their dogs. Just imagine what we wouldn't know if Bartleman had been a cat lover. Still, assuming that he is telling the truth (and why would he lie?), the key part of the Bartleman tale is the source of the Air India warning. The CSE is Canada's other security agency, one so hush-hush that even its existence was kept secret until 1983. Set up in 1947 to eavesdrop on Soviet telephone conversations, by the '80s it was a major international player in the snoop business, with links to a worldwide network of Western agencies that intercept telecommunications. http://www.thestar.com/News/article/210681 [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on May 7, 2007]

Note: http://www.thestar.com/...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sat May 05, 2007 8:37 pm
    In a way it is encouraging that this case is still being investigated and debated over 20 years later, showing the importance of finding out the facts, as much as possible. Which is how it should be and should have been done many years ago.

    On the other hand, the far bigger tragedy of 9/11 was brushed under the carpet in a few weeks, leaving it wide open to speculation, because the resulting reports were nothing more than hogwash/whitewash to shut the public up. The whole affair stinks to high heaven, with only the faithful clinging to the official explanation.

    I wonder whether the truth will be found out in either, especially in the case of 9/11 ? Remarkable how people suddenly suffer loss of memories.

    Ed Deak.

  2. by RPW
    Sat May 05, 2007 10:44 pm
    That this happened during the Mulroney government's tenure is I think, about as much of a "coincidence" as the Airbus Scandal......


    ---
    "When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change."
    -Max Planck



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news