Flu Crimes

Posted on Saturday, October 23 at 10:20 by Milton
By Dr. Mark A. Sircus Ac., OMD International Medical Veritas Association

On the 7th of October, the BBC started hitting the public with its yearly dose of hyped flu propaganda. "The 1918 "Spanish" flu pandemic is estimated to have infected up to one billion people -- half the world's population at the time. The virus killed more people than any other single outbreak of disease, surpassing even the Black Death of the Middle Ages."(1) One can only wonder about "the miracle" of vaccines in those early days.

Today in England, with the most modern technology, we have a vaccine plant closing because of contamination. Imagine during World War I, when the pharmaceutical companies first started mass-producing vaccines. At that time, refrigeration was chancier and vaccine manufacturing technology primitive. Federal regulators said an inspection of Chiron's flu-vaccine plant in June 2003 turned up manufacturing problems, meaning they had ample warning of troubles that, over a year later, remained unresolved.

John Taylor, the FDA's associate commissioner for regulatory affairs, was correct in saying, last year, that "Chiron wouldn't necessarily be able to discover problems, identify the root cause and take steps to prevent similar issues from arising again." (2)

Why would we assume the early manufacturers of almost 100 years ago would do any better? Chiron's Fluvirin vaccine was pulled off the market after the dangerous serratia bacteria was found in a manufacturing plant that uses the most up-to-the-minute safeguards. Chiron also uses the mercury-based preservative thimerosal as a sterilizing agent in making Fluvirin, to prevent exactly this type of contamination. Before the 1930s, no such powerful preservative was available. It's not beyond reason or statistical probability that the vaccines back then were contaminated or seriously flawed in some way and provoked the epidemic that killed so many. Dr. Eleanor McBean, who lived through the 1918 Influenza epidemic, testified, "As far as I could find out, the flu hit only the vaccinated. Those who had refused the shots escaped the flu. My family had refused all the vaccinations so we remained well all the time. There was seven times more disease among the vaccinated soldiers than among the unvaccinated civilians, and the diseases were those they had been vaccinated against." (3)

Scare Tactics

It's quite normal for the medical establishment to bash the public with improbable stories of the past and "carrot stick" them with future fears saying things like this: Scientists believe the 1918 virus leapt to humans by mutating from bird flu, possibly after passing through pigs, which are able to harbor both human and avian viruses and thus allow them to swap genes as the viruses reproduce. For that reason, experts are deeply concerned that the avian flu that has broken out in poultry flocks in parts of south-east Asia may acquire genes that will make it highly infectious as well as lethal for humans. (4) This kind of speculation is simply that, speculation. Beliefs without substance. A good storyline to scare naïve people with. We can as easily believe the vaccines themselves killed hundreds of thousands of people because the pharmaceutical manufacturers had not developed safeguards or sufficient technology to ensure quality control.

"Influenza kills tens of thousands every year in this country and requires the hospitalization of about a quarter-million. In epidemic years, mortality can be in the millions,"(5) says Dr. Henry I. Miller, a fellow at the Hoover Institution and former director of the Office of Biotechnology, who seems not to have read the CDC's version (6), which puts 1918 flu deaths at only 500,000, the Asian Flu pandemic of 1957-58 at 70,000 and the Hong Kong Flu pandemic of 1968-69 at 34,000. Medical authorities, the media and doctors like Miller tend to have statistical hallucinations this time of year. Miller goes on to suggest, "The FDA should also make it clear that although the labeling for FluMist, the nasal vaccine, indicates that it is intended for recipients aged 5 to 49 years, it will likely also be effective in those younger or older."

FluMist was a disaster last year not only because it is expensive but because it is dangerous and comes with warnings that those who use it can become contagious for up to 21 days to those around them, because of it's live viruses. Miller, in some kind of manic need to sure up this year's flu campaign, would have it stuffed up the noses of babies even though the FDA has indicated this is not safe.

The CDC estimated that from 1990 to 1999, an average of approximately 92 influenza-related deaths occurred each year among children less than 5 years of age.(7)

For the rest of the story as well as a history of Vaccine Crimes click the link: Flu Crimes

Note: Flu Crimes

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by avatar Milton
    Sat Oct 23, 2004 5:58 pm
    Before you allow yourself or your loved ones to be injected with a magic bullet you might want to do some research, because the <a href="http://www.whale.to/vaccines/studies.html">medical establishments haven't!</a>

  2. Sat Oct 23, 2004 7:10 pm
    I took the flu shot for two consecutive years, and got a sore arm for 3 days both times. They did reduce my SYMPTOMS, but they didn't make my immune system stronger. After the 6-month period, I would've been more vulnerable to a virus. I know this, because last year, I didn't get a flu shot, because I got the flu the day before I was to get the shot. The symtoms were a bit more serious than they would've been had I not gotten the shots the the years previous IMO, because I could tell my natural immunity had been weakened.

    I'm never getting a flu-shot again. My doctor is a good one, but is paranoid. He has asthma and thinks he'll certainly die or something should he get the flu. He's wealthy and overweight. :) I'm not getting talked into it again.

    Regarding the 1918 flu issue, many people have suggested it was engineered by humans using a bird mycoplasma. I hadno no idea that flu-shots were that common back then; perhaps those vaccine deaths were no accident? Elites don't care much for the peasants that aren't needed to do their bidding.

  3. by avatar Milton
    Sun Oct 24, 2004 4:51 pm
    You are right, vaccines are dangerous. <p>" It may be that the real "sitting ducks" don't know it. According to an article (backed with 68 footnote references) by Neil Z. Miller appearing in the Spring 1994 issue of Mothering: <p> In 1976, Dr. Salk, creator of the killed-virus (polio) vaccine, testified that the live-virus (Sabin oral) vaccine had been "the principle if not sole cause" of all reported polio cases in the United States since 1961... According to CDC (Centers for Disease Control) figures, from 1980 through 1989, every case of polio contracted within the United States was caused by the vaccine. (p. 46) <p>In New Directions, Summer 1991, an article by John Riker tells us that there are actually three types of polio virus. "Types 1 and 3 were responsible for almost all the polio cases worldwide... as much as 97% of paralytic polio." Type 2, making up the remaining 3%, seems to be the only type against which the Salk vaccine is truly effective. "In 1959 there was a Type 3 outbreak in Massachusetts in which there were more cases in the triple vaccinates than in the unvaccinated." (p. 24) Several other studies cited show no polio protection advantage for vaccinated children. We have here evidence that undermines the well-publicized but statistically questionable merits of either the Salk or Sabin polio vaccines. <p>Argument 4: Just in case, be safe <p>Not getting vaccinations may actually be safer than getting them. Consider the DPT shot. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been paid out to parents of vaccine-disabled or vaccine-killed children, generally due to the pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine in particular. According to statistics compiled by the National Vaccine Information Center, in a 39-month period between July, 1990 and November, 1993, "1,576 children died from adverse reactions to common vaccines" in the U.S. (Rochester, NY Democrat and Chronicle, March 3, 1994). Most deaths were from the pertussis vaccine. This works out to 40 deaths per month. In unimmunized Great Britain, during a 24-month period (1978-1979) there were 36 deaths attributed to whooping cough itself. Even allowing for wide variation in sample dates and population, it is impossible to dismiss the fact that more American kids died from shots in one month than British kids died without shots in two years." <p><a href="http://www.doctoryourself.com/vaccination.html">From the <i><b>Doctor Yourself</b></i> archives</a>.

  4. by RPW
    Sun Oct 24, 2004 6:46 pm
    I am wondering just what this big push is to get flu shots.......

    ---
    RickW

  5. Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:29 pm
    I don't believe there is an advantage for a healthy person to get the flu shot, but someone with a compromised immune system is a different story. The elderly, those fighting other illness, are the ones who should get the shot. I have received the shot for about 4 years now, and am glad I did, with fibromyalgia I am already struggling to fight illness, and it has prevented me from getting the flu. So for me it is a good thing, perhaps it's not for everyone.

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  6. Sun Oct 24, 2004 8:12 pm
    the flu shot debate is a form of terrorism. Do i get a shot, or not? Now, it appears, there's lots of new reasons not to get a shot. But when the anthraX (or whatever) attack happens and an anitidote is made available, will i balk and remember the flu shot debates/fake terror? Take a look at how confused Rappaport has become about the Chiron controversy, over at www.nomorefakenews.com. I wonder if he realises he's being used to screw up people's heads.

    Remember one thing, there is a good chance of more fake biowarfare, like the phony anthrax attack blamed on an egyptian (Arab terror! Arab terror!) but actually perpetrated by a zionist. I say this because technology has caught up with thousands of years of inbreeding, especially amongst the jew. There are definite and specific markers in a jew's dna that can be manipulated by biowarfare, the jews know this and are quite rightly paranoid about anihilation. You can be SURE they will attack you first, before this biowarfare can be used on them. In fact you can take it to the bank(lol) that they will conduct another biowar attack and blame it on someone else (as is there nature, see 911)

  7. by avatar Milton
    Sun Oct 24, 2004 9:41 pm
    What do you mean by "as is there nature". I have heard that there were intentions to develop viruses that would attack specific genetic traits. I have also heard that the creeps weren't successful, I hope I heard the truth. I also heard that the anthrax attacks in the US were designed to stop certain congressman and senators from pursuing answers to illegal governmental activities and that the anthrax was of the US military strain. If you want to blame someone then be specific. Don't just start labeling everyone with ancestral origins from a certain part of the world as perpetrators.

  8. by avatar Milton
    Sun Oct 24, 2004 10:08 pm
    Catherine, have a look <a href="http://www.doctoryourself.com/fibromyalgia.html"> here</a>.

  9. Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:25 am
    Milton if this works, I'll be thrilled to bits! I do take Vit C but not that much; I've tried just about everything else and have recovered significantly, but I want the full cure, so thanks a million!

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  10. Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:29 am
    As for anon above, not much fact and alot of racial b.s.; it's that kind of thinking that the world could use less of and I think the paranoid thinking belongs to you not the Jewish people!

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  11. Mon Oct 25, 2004 4:05 am
    I got the flu vaccine in the past and every year, I got the flu badly. When I don't get the flu vaccine, I get a minor flu that clears up within 4-6 days or I don't get it at all. My immune system is much better than any old flu vaccine. Probably most of the members of Vive have an excellent immune system and can fight the flu on their own.

    ---
    Alliance Atlantis films proudly presents...

  12. Mon Oct 25, 2004 3:50 pm
    Forget flu shots. Get the Flu, best thing for your immune system. Boost your immune system: Cold F/X. Developed and tested right here in Edmonchuk. I highly reccommend it!<p> <p>---<br>"If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill <br />

  13. Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:12 pm
    Actually, there is an advantage in getting a flu shot, even for strong, healthy people.

    By either preventing a healthy and otherwise strong person from getting the flu (or lessening the duration of the illness) it reduces the chance that the disease may be passed to individuals who are more at risk (and likely to die).

  14. Mon Oct 25, 2004 10:18 pm
    Vaccines are not dangerous, compared to the alternative (a population that has not been immunised).

    The statistics from the "Doctor yourself" site are an example of poor statistical analysis. Yes, when people are immunised, there is a chance of side effects. There will also be individuals for whom the vaccine does not work. In a large population where the majority is vaccinated, you will concievably find more health problems with the people that have been vaccinated, than with the minority that haven't. That does not mean that the vaccine is dangerous; it simply a result of the large number of people vaccinated, and the result of "herd immunity" protecting the unvaccinated population.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news