Also, a consortium of 10 U.S. utilities has requested funding from the
federal government for the construction of new reactors based on a European
design, and they hope to receive government approval by 2010. This is a
major policy change since no new nuclear reactors have been ordered in the
United States since 1974.
Nevertheless, the claims of the Mr. Cheney and the nuclear industry are
false. According to data from the U.S. Energy Department (DOE), the
production of nuclear power significantly contributes both to global
warming and ozone depletion.
The enrichment of uranium fuel for nuclear power uses 93 percent of the
refrigerant chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) gas made annually in the United
States. The global production of CFC is banned under the Montreal Protocol
because it is a potent destroyer of ozone in the stratosphere, which
protects us from the carcinogenic effects of solar ultraviolet light. The
ozone layer is now so thin that the population in Australia is currently
experiencing one of the highest incidences of skin cancer in the world.
CFC compounds are also potent global warming agents 10,000 to 20,000 times
more efficient heat trappers than carbon dioxide, which itself is
responsible for 50 percent of the global warming phenomenon.
But nuclear power also contributes significantly to global carbon dioxide
production. Huge quantities of fossil fuel are expended for the "front end"
of the nuclear fuel cycle -- to mine, mill and enrich the uranium fuel and
to construct the massive nuclear reactor buildings and their cooling
towers.
Uranium enrichment is a particularly energy intensive process which uses
electricity generated from huge coal-fired plants. Estimates of carbon
dioxide production related to nuclear power are available from DOE for the
"front end" of the nuclear fuel cycle, but prospective estimates for the
"back end" of the cycle have yet to be calculated.
Tens of thousands of tons of intensely hot radioactive fuel rods must
continuously be cooled for decades in large pools of circulating water and
these rods must then be carefully transported by road and rail and isolated
from the environment in remote storage facilities in the United States. The
radioactive reactor building must also be decommissioned after 40 years of
operation, taken apart by remote control and similarly transported long
distances and stored. Fully 95 percent of U.S. high level waste -- waste
that is intensely radioactive -- has been generated by nuclear power thus
far.
This nuclear waste must then be guarded, protected and isolated from the
environment for tens of thousands of years -- a physical and scientific
impossibility. Biologically dangerous radioactive elements such as
strontium 90, cesium 137 and plutonium will seep and leak into the water
tables and become very concentrated in food chains for the rest of time,
inevitably increasing the incidence of childhood cancer, genetic diseases
and congenital malformations for this and future generations
Conclusion: Nuclear power is neither clean, green nor safe. It is the most
biologically dangerous method to boil water to generate steam for the
production of electricity.
Helen Caldicott, a pediatrican, is president of the Nuclear Policy Research
Institute and author of The New Nuclear Danger, George Bush's Military
Industrial Complex (The New Press). She lives near Sydney, Australia.
Comments
view comments in forum
You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.