Where Is The Media At Bilderberg?

Posted on Tuesday, April 06 at 10:23 by Anonymous
Outsiders regard the meetings as “secret,” whereas attendees defend them as “private.” While they are exercising their rights to free assembly, I doubt that industry and state leaders of this calibre get together to engage in idle banter, scotch-drinking and a round of golf. The purpose of the meetings is to reach an informal consensus and then work towards that consensus through their more formal governmental bodies such as the G8.

Last year’s meeting took place near Versailles, France while most of us were enjoying our annual May-long holiday, and barely was a peep heard of it in the Canadian press. Some headline guests included, as always, Henry Kissinger and Conrad Black (who sits on the steering committee that chooses invitees) as well as big-name Canadians like Heather Reisman of Chapters-Indigo, Anthony Fell, Chairman of RBC Dominion Securities, Mark Steyn, writer for Conrad Black’s paper group, and Stephen Harper.

Maybe the corporate media is just stupid, or perhaps they’re in on it, too. Only the 15 May, 2003 issue of the Toronto Sun and the 6 June, 2003 issue of Edmonton’s See Magazine mentioned Stephen Harper’s attendance, but both failed to provide the coverage that others such as Pepe Escobar’s “Masters of the Universe” article did for the Asia Times. The only other coverage available was on blogs and Independent Media Collective (Indymedia) websites across Canada.

A 1987 issue of the Economist magazine once declared: “when you have scaled the Bilderberg, you have arrived.” This is why Stephen Harper’s recent attendance at the 2003 Bilderberg meeting has such significance, as it indicates that the global ruling class has placed its long-term bets on Harper. This is important for the Conservative leadership race, as Belinda Stronach has only captured the hearts of the World Economic Forum crowd, who rank lower in the global-ruling food chain. However, the real leadership race is amongst the partisan plebeians, and in all likelihood, the globalists can only hope for a positive outcome.

The Bilderberg group is said, though, to have made kings of Bill Clinton and Tony Blair, who were unknowns until after they had done their rounds at the annual meetings. Uncle Ralph did it the other way, as he was whisked away in 1995 to a Bilderberg meeting a few years after becoming King of the Kleinocratic Ralph-ublic of Oilbertastan, 51st State in the Union. Some say it reflected Black’s admiration for the “privatize and tell lots of lies” strategy that plunged Alberta into the Kleinocracy it is today. Klein is not unique, though, as other Canadian politicians like Paul Martin and Mike Harris have attended. Is this why Klein appears closer to Martin and Harris? I asked Uncle Ralph this very question recently, and he responded with a “no.”

To Canada’s media conglomerates, I say do your job to inform us as to how these meetings shape Canada’s future and how the Bilderberg consensus affects our policies and lives. The next one might be in Florida or Georgia—get your asses down there and cover it. Because after all, we have a right to know.

Wanna respond? Send your feedback to gateway@gateway.ualberta.ca.

Note: Where is the media at B... gateway@gateway.ualbert...

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Apr 07, 2004 2:48 am
    From the Gateway no less! Interesting article!<p> For those that don't know, the Gateway is the U of A's Student paper. They once did a really great article on how Quebec separated and is now a island in the Atlantic.<p> I didn't realize how much they had changed!<p><p>---<br>"History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme" Mark Twain <br />
    "The greatest price of not participating in politics is being governed by your inferiors." Plato

  2. by N Say
    Wed Apr 07, 2004 4:58 am
    I thought they met in Toronto one year & it was their highest-profile meeting to date. They even got written up in the Toronto Star.

    ---
    "So many right-wing Christians, so few lions." - t-shirt I saw @ school

  3. by N Say
    Wed Apr 07, 2004 5:00 am
    Oh yeah, I wonder where the Trilateral Commission & the Council on Foreign Relations fits into the "economic food chain", or whatever the author called it.

    ---
    "So many right-wing Christians, so few lions." - t-shirt I saw @ school

  4. Wed Apr 07, 2004 6:08 am
    The media is exactly where they are told to be; spinning other stories to keep us busy, while the 'queen bee and all the drones' plot the next move in corporate world takeovers!

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  5. Wed Apr 07, 2004 1:07 pm
    the media which is owned by the reps of Bilderberg. part of the New World Order, aka the Illuminati, aka Masons, obey their masters....today those that work for any major media companies are not reporters anymore...but lackeys holding unto a job for that steady pay check....or monkeys dancing to the organ grinder...case in point all canadian newspapers..all western tv media....those that work for the media today 99 per cent are the mouth pieces for the organ grinders

  6. Wed Apr 07, 2004 4:09 pm
    NSay: I think he said "global-ruling food chain". If you want to see how the Trilateral commission fits in, get yourself a copy of Prof. Stephen Gill's book "American Hegemony and the Trilateral Commission". Upon getting yourself educated, perhaps you could re-visit this thread with somethig worthwhile to add! That would be great. Hey, maybe you could even try to track down the Escobar article that's mentioned and form your own opinion rather than parrotting a pre-packaged dismissal of the entire thing. It's a good question - where is the media at these meetings?

  7. by N Say
    Wed Apr 07, 2004 8:00 pm
    I wasn't being sarcastic, it was a real question. I was just asking.

    ---
    "So many right-wing Christians, so few lions." - t-shirt I saw @ school

  8. Wed Apr 07, 2004 10:10 pm
    good times, good times. Highly reccomend Escobar's article. Keep askin questions y'all.

  9. Wed Apr 07, 2004 10:14 pm
    Nsay: My bad, my bad. My apologies, not yours. No such thing as dumb questions, just snarky answers like mine. bilderberg.org - check it out.

  10. Thu Apr 08, 2004 6:33 am
    in the internet age, Bilderberg meetings mean less every year. Take Steyn and Reisman, both in the media business. (and both prominent neo-con supporters and jews) and tired reps of 'old' media, book retailing(censorship) and newspaper journalism. Sad fact of life, these two types of businesses are heading for the wastebin. Any book sold at a coffee house bookstore is now censored. "Cleansed" in order to block out historical revisionism. Any story put out by the National, Globe and Star is "Cleansed" in order that people will not question the historical record, ... a record of manipulating events to produce desired outcomes.. outcomes such as the lie that the Pearl Harbor attack was a 'surprise' or the falsehood of the Gulf of Tonkin attack that spurred the Gulf of Tonkin resolution, a truly bogus misrepresentation to draw the United States into a theatre of war, all with the complicit hand of media... media represented today by the likes of Reisman, Steyn and the rest of the liar tribe - that seek ever more sympathy to the point they will stoop to scribbling swastika's over their own synagogues.

  11. Thu Apr 08, 2004 6:52 am
    You know what I get sooooo tired of? It is the reference to people's religion...it doesn't matter...it is not the issue...a crook is a crook...a warmonger a warmonger...greedy corporate elites come in all nationalities, creeds and colours...sooooo get off the profiling crap if you really want your point to be heard! As soon as I read the words that are attempting to put crooks into profiles I do not hear the message...maybe it's just me... but I doesn't work for me...

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  12. Thu Apr 08, 2004 3:03 pm
    I hear you. The kind of hatred this person churns out is no different that the Nazi propaganda machine of the 1930's. The terrible thing is, this person doesn't realize it's hatred.<p> There is no place for hatred here.<p> <p>---<br>"History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme" Mark Twain <br />
    "The greatest price of not participating in politics is being governed by your inferiors." Plato

  13. Sat Apr 10, 2004 8:40 pm
    http://www.adl.org/rumors/bilderberg.asp

    The Anti-Defamation League says you are a thought criminal if you denounce the Bilderberg Meetings and think they are a part of some grand conspiracy.

    "ADL has received inquiries about conspiracy theories regarding the Bilderberg group, a legitimate business entity with ties to Europe and America. The following information from the ADL's Civil Rights Information Center debunks a recurring myth, circulated via the Internet, that the group is part of a conspiracy to promote a "new world order" under their control.
    Deriving its name from the Dutch hotel where it first met in 1954, the Bilderberg group is an actual, legitimate entity whose members consist of approximately 100 influential European and American figures in politics, business and academia who meet annually to discuss and advocate political, diplomatic and economic policies.

    Various far-right extremists and conspiracy theorists, however, charge that the group is a shadowy force seeking to control world events, exerting allegedly dominating powers of international influence to promote a "new world order" under their control. The extremists claim that Presidential candidates of both major U.S. political parties are controlled by the Bilderberg group; among those often mentioned in such conspiracy-oriented propaganda are David Rockefeller, the Clintons and Henry Kissinger. Other Bilderberg leaders are said to be members of the Trilateral Commission and the Council on Foreign Relations -- groups which themselves are often central players in far-right conspiracy theories of secret efforts at domination of the world's political and financial institutions and the press. Such charges about the Bilderberg group were a regular feature in The Spotlight, the recently-defunct weekly tabloid of the far-right, anti-Semitic Liberty Lobby."

    I'm sorry,ADL, but this did little to "debunk" the Bilderberg "myth". It only tosses around some rhetoric that associates Anti-Bilerberg folk with Nazis. If anything, the BB's are Nazi-esque in their ethos, which is why it's weird to see them trying to debunk it rather than oppse it. The BB's aren't a Jewish Organization, so why is the ADL so keen to jump to their defence?

  14. Sat Apr 10, 2004 9:39 pm
    Although I can't say their all myths. I can say one thing. Why are these meetings mostly secret, and why do they influence governments without the people having a say. These are elite who are pushing their world ideas on a society that has no say. What makes these rich business people any smarter then the average joe. Of course they make millions and have become successful. It doesn't mean that just cause they can make millions and be successful that gives them authority to decide how the world works.

    Kevin



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news