To get positive result changes, we must identify and expose the weaknesses and segments that have gone rotten.
To begin, let us look at where we came from.
Starting with the Second World War, Canada saw its position in the world propelled forward through the horrors and tribulations of total war. Little Canada grew up in that period and those that lived through that time took the initiative and kept on going.
Canada in the immediate post-war period saw tremendous social change. Soldiers returning from the war, and those that fueled the war machine at home, wanted to ensure that they really did put their lives and effort on the line for more than the freedom of others. They all wanted to see their blood, toil and sweat pay off here at home as well.
Our national industrial base and capacity was greatly expanded due to the war effort. Our farms were maximized and other resource-based industries were brought to full speed. Our ability to play with the big boys had come.
But it was not only what we were capable of doing with our hands that had changed, our attitudes about government and our society had also changed. Canadians came to realize that forging ahead with social change was something that was not only attainable, but also desirable. It was with that prevailing thought that the new Canada was born.
Social ideals and movements were no longer dirty words or bad ideas. The CCF more than proved this and the foundations of our social systems were born. Scare mongering on behalf of the elite did not succeed.
The Canadian people came to realize that the Canada they sought to obtain for themselves, their families and the future generations of Canadians should be based on a social system. It was a system that was compassionate and inclusive. Government had a new role to play, and Canadians were more than willing to be a part of that new expanded role. Governments now had a central role to play in Canadian lives.
Social systems were expanded and employee unions grew in strength and numbers. The Canadian economy grew rapidly to match those strides. The Canadian dream in many ways had become the envy of the world. Many post-war immigrants put Canada at the top of their wish lists. Canada by the mid 1970’s was the premier middle power.
It seemed Canada could do no wrong.
But… the wheels eventually fell off.
With the post-war period of growth came new ideas and new ways of looking at the present scope of economic events. At the heart of these new ideas was the notion of ‘free markets’. Increasingly, the wealthy and powerful in Canada and elsewhere were coming to believe that governments had grown too big and had become too wasteful.
Combined with that general feeling was a sense that corporations and the ultra wealthy were overtaxed and overly burdened by the burgeoning social system, which Canadians had come to enjoy and actually depend upon.
At the core of this new mantra was the adoption of the ideas of Milton Friedman. Instead of using our own bank – the Bank of Canada – to finance our needs, we acquiesced our economic sovereignty to a handful of private banks. Instantly we saw our manageable national debt explode into what we see today – over $500 billion owing with no end in sight of the interest payments due.
Couple the abandoning of our own bank with a constant march of tax cuts for the rich and corporations at the expense of the entire system, we saw the inevitable curtailing of what Canadians had worked so hard to build. Our national social system was now enemy number one, and still is today to those that preach ‘free market’ fundamentalism.
Groups like the Fraser Institute, the C.C.C.E., and the C.D. Howe Institute have all but declared war on what Canadians have worked so hard to create. To many traveling in those circles, social institutions and pubic entities are just added waste to be trimmed so others may reap the benefit. With that is the idea that governments are not to be central to social planning, but instead private institutions are to take over and take place of democratically elected officials.
Corporations now benefit from yearly record profits while our social system collapses around it. In its place are public entities turned private for profit. This panacea was the solution put forward by the few for the many. Thing is, it has not worked as advertised.
Although, increasingly, those that have pushed these ideas onto Canadians have refused to see the obvious, so they continue to push for more of the same in the insane hope that in the end it will all work out. Like an addicted gambler they are always betting that the next spin of the reel will be the winning spin.
To return Canada to its former glory we must turn back the clock. Rarely is this ever an answer for anything in life, but this is one of those times when exceptions count in the final formula. By once again utilizing the Bank of Canada and moving away from the all out ‘free market’ craze we can return Canada to its rightful place as the premier middle power that was respected and looked at as a world leader.
Sadly, if this does not happen we can lump ourselves in with the other failed experiments throughout history.
Roy Whyte
Canadian Action Party Candidate for Surrey North British Columbia
Comments
view comments in forum
You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.
'Free markets' are not thousands of years old. They are a recent creation. Governments have always been in control of their markets. That is fact, and they are STILL in control of the economy. Canada was in essence built by the Hudsons Bay Company, who was tightly controled by the British government of the day. Same goes for all the British colonies.
There is plenty of historical evidence of societies that collectively sought to curb individual acquisitiveness. In the 14th century a merchant was always allowed to make a profit, a fair return, that is one that would allow them to live in a manner appropriate for someone in their social position. But for those that tried to squeeze an extra profit (free markets) were considered as "enemies both to God and man, opposite both to Grace and Nature."
Only in England in the time from 1840 to the 1870s was there any flirting with laissez-faire capitalism.
As well, from 1939 to 1974 Canada was THE premier middle power - some failed experiment. Only since the introduction of the far-right experiment with corporate dominance has Canada slipped off the charts. The 1990s was Canada's worst growth period since the Great Depression.
You also ignore the simple fact that governments are needed to mandate laws, and use much state power to establish and maintain the new system of 'free markets'. First through the creation of laws, and then through the the enforcement of those laws by courts and the police. Just a tad bit off your assertment that government control has been a failure.
Or are you admitting the 'free markets' themselves are a failure because of government control?
Or are you suggesting 'free markets' just spring into creation like trolls from under a bridge without any government intervention?
Let us use a current event model - the US private for profit health care-system is 40% more expensive per capita than the Canadian PUBLIC system, even though the Canadian system provides full medical coverage for all Canadians and the US system leaves over 40 million with no coverage at all. It isnt because we are smarter, its because ours is public and theirs is profit driven.
But hey, ignore history and continue on with the far-right propoganda - it makes it easy for us to poke holes in it.
Take care,
Roy
Not everyone is lucky and healthy enough to be the best CEO in history, and to make the best of their situation.
Consider this: a person gets a good education, and starts down the road of building a career, then out of the blue, they get a serious disease, and it puts them in the hospital for a time, and when they get out they can no longer work.
Or: they have a good job, and they fall off a scaffold and break their neck which puts them in a wheelchair for the rest of their lives.
Or: they have a stroke, and can no longer contribute to society.
What would you have these people do ?
A healthcare system that looks after every person that has a medical problem, that doesn't put their savings at risk, or doesn't force them to declare bankruptcy to pay for the surgery they may require, this is a healthcare system that cares for people.
What kind of world do you really want ??
Are you really that selfish ?
---
"Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
Jim Callaghan
Minden, Ontario
705-286-1860
www.misterc.ca
---
"We can only see a short distance ahead, but we can see plenty there that needs to be done." - Alan Turing
---
Dave Ruston
---
"We can only see a short distance ahead, but we can see plenty there that needs to be done." - Alan Turing
The Reform/Alliance/Conservative Party, the Liberals, the NDP, and the Greens....ALL....support the capitalist system.
We need to change the entire system.
Check out the goals and principles of The Socialist Party of Canada at www.worldsocialism.org/canada/index.htm
---
"We can only see a short distance ahead, but we can see plenty there that needs to be done." - Alan Turing