Vive Le Canada

The 911 Who-Did-It

Posted on Sunday, September 05 at 10:30 by Milton

"In my new book I will be making several key points:

1. I will name Richard Cheney as the prime suspect in the mass murders of 9/11 and will establish that, not only was he a planner in the attacks, but also that on the day of the attacks he was running a completely separate Command, Control and Communications system which was superceding any orders being issued by the NMCC [National Military Command Center], or the White House Situation Room.

2. I will establish conclusively that in May of 2001, by presidential order, Richard Cheney was put in direct command and control of all wargame and field exercise training and scheduling through several agencies, especially FEMA. This also extended to all of the conflicting and overlapping NORAD drills on that day.

3. I will also demonstrate that the TRIPOD II exercise being set up on Sept. 10th in Manhattan was directly connected to Cheney's role.

4. I will also prove conclusively that a number of public officials, at the national and New York City levels, including then Mayor Rudolph Giuliani, were aware that Flight 175 was en route to lower Manhattan for 20 minutes and did nothing to order the evacuation of or warn the occupants of the South Tower. One military officer was forced to leave his post in the middle of the attacks and place a private call to his brother -- who worked at the WTC -- warning him to get out. That was because no other part of the system was taking action.

5. I will also show that the Israeli and British governments acted as partners with the highest levels of the American government to help in the preparation and, very possibly, the actual execution of the attacks."

"There is more reason to be afraid of not facing the evidence in this book than of facing what is in it."

Crossing the Rubicon: the Decline of the American Empire at the End of the Age of Oil by Michael C. Ruppert is a detective story that gets to the innermost core of the 9/11 attacks. It places 9/11 at the center of a desperate new America, created by specific, named individuals in preparation for Peak Oil: an economic crisis like nothing the world has ever seen.

The speech in its entirety may be read here:

Scoop Archive

Note: Scoop Archive

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by kwantize
    Sun Sep 05, 2004 6:54 pm
    That's the venue where <a href='//www.fbi.gov/pressrel/speeches/speech041902.htm'>Robert Müller admitted there was no evidence against the fall guys</a>. You should recognise Ruppert as the the lead in of <a href='//cbc.ca/fifth/conspiracytheories/'><i>fifth estate</i>'s "Conspiracy Theories"</a> (an unfortunate title). It's interesting that he touches on Israel; he'd avoided the Israel stuff like plague until now.

  2. by N Say
    Sun Sep 05, 2004 7:44 pm
    I think the official story can't be true, but then again I'm sure if it was an inside job it would surely have been leaked. www.cooperativeresearch.org is the best site by far on the web for 9/11/01 stuff.

    ---
    "George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va

  3. by avatar Milton
    Sun Sep 05, 2004 8:29 pm
    I'm sure he would name prominent government officials names if he didn't have proof to back what he was saying. Why isn't Cheney suing him if what he says is false? I don't know what you would expect Robert Muller to say considering that he is head of the FBI and his volunteering that there was no evidence is also ludicrous. <p>Considering that Michael was "in the belly of the beast",(the Commonwealth club), giving this speech it doesn't surprise me that its members, some of whom he was accusing of involvement in the most heinous crime of the century, would protest that there was no proof. Especially if they were responsible for making sure that there was no proof remaining. Michael made sure he had proof before he blew the lid off 911. I could care less what half hearted fumble fingered CBC program had to say about "Conspiracy Theories", they are as much a part of the establishment as any other government organization. Deal with what Michael had to say specifically instead of piece meal character innuendo. <p>Yes, Cooperative Research is a good site for 911 documentation, Paul holds us to a high standard, everything there is checked and rechecked. Paul Thompson's first book "The Terror Timeline" is a collective effort to give those trying to investigate the massive 911 coverup a tool to turn the light on with. Saying that someone would have blown the whistle by now assumes that those in the know would have wanted or dared to blow the whistle. Considering that Sibel Edmonds was slapped with a gag order for what she discovered after 911 what do you think would happen to someone who actually participated in 911. Who would they tell?

  4. by oost_oneiric
    Sun Sep 05, 2004 9:02 pm
    Neurotic conspiracy theories become reality. What a frighteningly exciting time to be alive. I just wonder, what are we to do about it?

    Revolution brewing?

    ---
    Revolution.

  5. by avatar Milton
    Mon Sep 06, 2004 2:40 am
    Here are a couple of videos to view. <p>If you right click on this link, <a href="http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/video1/inplanesite.rm ">Information Clearinghouse</a>, and click on "save link as" you can download the 17.5 mb video file. You will need real player to view it. You can download real player for free, just google it. <p>Next site is left clickable, you may need a flash player to view it but that is free and you can also get it by googling. <p><a href="http://pages.infinit.net/noc/pentagon.swf">Pentagon</a>

  6. by kwantize
    Mon Sep 06, 2004 4:32 am
    >I could care less what half hearted fumble fingered CBC program had to say...Deal with what Michael had to say specifically instead of piece meal character innuendo. <p>If this is addressed to me, let me tell you I wrote CBC when they first peddled CS denouncing their obvious attempt to bury all Ruppert's work by poking holes in one of the few flakes in his research: Vreeland. (And regardless, considering all the things Vreeland could've totally made up and had sealed, I think it was more than dumb luck involved. It's certainly not a John Edward class of con.)

  7. by oost_oneiric
    Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:06 am
    Yeah I'm going to throw that video link to everyone.. summarizes a lot of the evidence wonderfully. There's so much evidence now.. from so many different sources.. soon it's going to come to a point that the mainstream media won't be able to deny it anymore. The "underground" (independant journalists, etc.) noise is becoming so loud that it's going to expose the propaghanda-filled nature of the mainstream media outlets if they continue to carry on white-washing the matter (for real.. rediculous amount of hurricane coverage. how many times do we need to see a guy standing in rain summarizing how much damage this hurricane COULD cause?). I absolutely cannot WAIT to see the mainstream news (propaghanda) networks like CNN, FoxNews, MSNBC and others try to explain their way out of this one. Oh, and the U.S. government too, heh.

    ---
    Revolution.

  8. by oost_oneiric
    Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:17 am
    Oh and also.. THREE HUNDRED TO FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND protesters at the Republican National convention. I watched CNN almost constantly during the convention waiting for them to cover that aspect. Nothing. Maybe once every three hours a 5 second spot "in other news, 2000 protesters were arrested. moving on.." They did not go into exactly what the protesters were protesting about except ONCE.. some dude reading off a piece of paper "protesters are angry about the economy and health care." Haha! Rediculous! Reads silly vague traditional political issues off a piece of paper handed to him (probably by the CIA, heh) as if it's the real reason! 95% of the protesters there were protesting the WAR and 9/11 LIES. The independant and many of the world's media covered this extensively. You turn on American news.. nothing. If there was any doubt in my mind that these multinational corporate media companies are just propaghanda tools for (globalist?) government(s), it's been expelled. There is no doubt in my mind now.

    ---
    Revolution.

  9. by Anonymous
    Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:32 am
    Oh please. Conspiracy theories are made up by people who don't want to face reality. Governments do so many things so poorly that it's a wonder they function at all, but the Vice-Prez can orchestrate attacks on New York and all those government employees who are his flunkies just go along with it, that's truly ridiculous thinking.
    9-11 was carried out by the people who planned, financed and trained for it and that would be Al-Qeada and its supporters. They send suicide bombers all over the world to attack all sorts of targets, like churches in Pakistan, does Dick Cheney have some oil interest in attacking Pakistani churches?

  10. by oost_oneiric
    Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:58 am
    Might I remind you.. al Quaeda was trained and funded by the U.S. government. That's a documented fact. That alone is a HUUUUUUUGE red flag. How can you overlook this? There's SO many other facts as well.. I suggest you look into it a little more. Seriously, just a few hours browsing the web, checking independant media sites and the like will really open your eyes.

    Unplug yourself from CNN.

    ---
    Revolution.

  11. by avatar Milton
    Mon Sep 06, 2004 1:48 pm
    oost, I think you are talking to a troll type. Anonymouse obviously can't refute the evidence offered here so the little rodent tries to deflect the focus to some act which is not being discussed. I think this is known as spin control propaganda. The object is to accord no validity to the facts presented by asserting that they (the facts ) are too childishly pathetic to warrant consideration. No attempt is to be made to defend the favored position. It is to be treated as so obviously correct that defense is irrelevant You are right, the hurricane coverage does appear to be being used as a WMD(<i>weapon of media distraction</i>). <p>kwantize, I misunderstood the thrust of your first comment, it is good to know that you reproached the CBC for their dereliction of duty.

  12. by Janis Schmidt
    Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:46 pm
    I am reminded that it was a Canadian who said, "a nation of idiots led by a moron." I think this statement was made several years ago, right shortly after 9-11, and Bush was imposing Patriot and Homeland, while gearing up for Afganistan and Shock and Awe. Finally, 4 years later, and the damage has been done, irretrievably, the snoozing American public is waking up, only to find that they have been bound and gagged. And the Middle East is now becoming one of America's new Indian Reservations. I do salute the Canadian who made the above true statement. It's a nice summary of why things are the way they are.

  13. by kwantize
    Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:59 pm
    Definitely a troll; but to deal with it with less trollish means: take some time to think about how you'd go about it. Obviously you wouldn't, say, tell your underlings you need them to confuse h@ll out of NORAD some given morning. You assign them the task under an innocuous heading like "go study this means of attack - go all out." Only when the deed is done will they ever figure out they were used and even then they have no proof. With good cover stories, only a handful are in on the whole thing. <p>Of course there are a few sticky witnesses; the actual highjackers - whoever they were, if there were any - and the innocents in their vicinity, must die - not usually a problem in a plane crash, unless some passengers decide to be heroes and have to be shot down. (In simpler hostage situations like we just saw in Russia eliminating the witnesses can get rather messy and obvious.) The less specific the witnesses get - like the ATCs - the milder the methods can get - eg, destroy the records, including chopping up the tapes of their untranscribed statements and scattering the pieces in a dozen wastebaskets. Almost no surviving witnesses will have anything like smoking guns and can simply be ignored or ridiculed; most will figure out "if they'd kill a few thousand they'd smuck my loved ones and I like Cheney and Scalia would a duck"; the remaining very few are watched and suicided if they appear to be cracking. (No, this isn't drawing in more and more people; that kind of killer simply gets orders, and knows and cares nothing about the why.) <p>I really don't agree all that many blow-the-lid-off potential squealers exist. After years a few may make deathbed confessions or something but by then the op has succeeded, the puppetmasters dead or senile, and the issue is academic.

  14. by Anonymous
    Mon Sep 06, 2004 11:56 pm
    The only truth in this post is the part about the 19 hijackers being 'patsies'. The Islamic religious leaders could care less about these fools who want to become suicide bombers, on the contrary they welcome these idiots because they're so efficient at generating terror.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.



Latest Editorials

more articles »

Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

sitemap | feeds | privacy | copyright | contact
canadian bloggers | canadian news