America's Role As The First, Only, And Last Truly Global Superpower

Posted on Monday, October 01 at 11:44 by Brent


Controlling Eurasia With American Imperial Power

From The Grand Chessboard:
"In brief, for the United States, Eurasian geostrategy involves the purposeful management of geostrategically dynamic states and the careful handling of geopolitically catalytic states, in keeping with the twin interests of America in the short-term preservation of its unique global power and in the long-run transformation of it into increasingly institutionalized global cooperation. To put it in a terminology that hearkens back to the more brutal age of ancient empires, the three grand imperatives of imperial geostrategy are to prevent collusion and maintain security dependence among the vassals, to keep tributaries pliant and protected, and to keep the barbarians from coming together." - 40

"...the issue of how a globally engaged America copes with the complex Eurasian power relationships - and particularly whether it prevents the emergence of a dominant and antagonistic Eurasian power -- remains central to America's capacity to exercise global primacy." - xiii

"A geostrategic issue of crucial importance is posed by China's emergence as a major power. The most appealing outcome would be to co-opt a democratizing and free-marketing China into a larger Asian regional framework of cooperation." - 54

"In effect, Japan should be America's global partner in tackling the new agenda of world affairs. A regionally preeminent China should become America's Far Eastern anchor in the more traditional domain of power politics, helping thereby to foster a Eurasian balance of power, with Greater China in Eurasia's East matching in that respect the role of an enlarging Europe in Eurasia's West." - 193
Read the full article here. [Proofreader’s note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on October 2, 2007]

Note: Knowledge Driven Revolu... Brzezinski here

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:06 pm
    The "last" superpower is correct.........

    The world never could and can not afford any more of them now, or in the future.

    Ed Deak.

  2. Tue Oct 02, 2007 5:05 pm
    Well how do you explain China? They'd roll over us effortlessly. With most, if not all, of the US troops out of town I don't see how the Red Stars could be stopped.

  3. by Deacon
    Tue Oct 02, 2007 5:26 pm
    "May you live in interesting times."

    Sadly, we do.

    I'd prefer peace and the boredom of a world where nations acted justly and differences were settled at the table rather than in the field of battle.

    But the times just keep on getting curiouser and curiouser.

    I have no desire to know what's next.

    ---
    If George W. Bush and Tony Blair are really Christians, then pork and shrimp are Kosher.

  4. Tue Oct 02, 2007 5:27 pm
    "...I don't see how the Red Stars could be stopped."
    Quite right! so let's not be giving them a reason to start



    ---
    "When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do."

    William Blake

  5. Tue Oct 02, 2007 6:12 pm
    Now was it the book of Revelations, Edgar Cayce, or Nostradamus, who said that the Bear(Russia) and the Dragon (China) shall fight the Eagle(guess) in the final war for the planet?

    It's really weird how these things just end up coming all together.

    ENDGAME.

    ---
    “The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous, the essential act of warfare is the destruction of the produce of human labour”

  6. Wed Oct 03, 2007 5:10 am
    It is never nations, or people, who fight wars, but leaders, kings, dictators and governments, selling the baloney to people that it is their duty to go and kill others for no logical reasons.

    The purpose of all wars is energy control. War and crime are the ultimate economic competition for energy control.

    When we look at the histories of wars, and I've spend decades on the subject, we can see that the resources and lives wasted in wars could have supplied the participants with far more than the so called "winning side" ever gained.

    In any case, empires self destruct, because they burn out
    fighting others to remain on top and ultimately, always lose.

    Right now 10 days of what is spent in the world on the military could give clean and healthy drinking water to everybody on Earth and one year's spending could literally solve all the problems of poverty, and environmental destruction.

    Ed Deak.

  7. Wed Oct 03, 2007 4:43 pm
    Yeah and we would probably only have to work one day a month.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news