"Escalating a sporadic, 35-year-old protest campaign, opponents of Canada's seal hunt are advocating a travel boycott, pushing their cause in the U.S. Senate, even recruiting Paris Hilton. Canadian officials say the tactics will fail and the hunt will continue."
Here's the link to the rest of the story:
Activists Revive Canada Seal Hunt Protest
Note: Activists Revive Canada...

Oh, I forgot, she\'s a blonde !!
(Only Kidding, REALLY !!)
Her mouth isn\'t much better !
BTW, I read a very good story about seal hunting last year. It\'s like any other kind of hunting, they do not mistreat the animals, it\'s a quick kill, very humane.
The reporter was on the ship with the hunters for some time, and went through some rough seas, but her admiration for the way they treated the seals was very honest.
The baby seal hunt was the one that got the most attention, simply because of the method they used for the kill, but it was quick as well.
It just didn\'t look good on the front page of the newspaper.
Hunting is a way of life in parts of the world, and if the herd is sustainable, there is no harm done.
I do not hunt anymore, but I used to enjoy the tracking and social aspect that goes along with it.
---
"Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
Jim Callaghan
Minden, Ontario
705-286-1860
www.misterc.ca
I\'m sorry, I have no common ground with the do-gooders and activists against the killing of animals. We all do it thousands of times every day.
It is how we eat and survive.
---
"Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
Jim Callaghan
Minden, Ontario
705-286-1860
www.misterc.ca
answer: Because the fur trade represents freedom. Y\'see, they don\'t want you to be self sufficient in clothing and meat (a bi-product of the fur trade is the food value). If you did that, then you\'d get all these funny notions of standing up to oppresive regimes, not using their phony paper money, and fighting debt enslavement.
always gotta look beyond the facade, folks
unfortunately, not too many people here do dat.
---
Dave Ruston
I just turned 60, and let me tell you, age discrimination is alive and well.
I have experience in many fields, but I live in Central Ontario, where jobs are scarce. I personally haven\'t had a job since 1996. Most are seasonal, so that means people have to live on $14k per year, so most young people move to the city, make their fortune and then return home to retire.
How about the company that closes its doors, firing employees with 20 and 30 years experience and shipping the jobs overseas or to Mexico. That is happening big time, and those jobs are gone forever.
Some of the trouble with a small community in this area is that when the big contracts come up, they usually (almost always) hire the large firms from Toronto. I\'ve been an active opponent against this policy for many years, but change isn\'t coming soon.
I did see an item on the news this week telling of a small town in northern BC that is hiring all kinds of workers with skills.
At my age, I would be willing to take the plunge for some of that.
Keep me posted. Thanks.
---
"Arrogance in Politics is unacceptable"
Jim Callaghan
Minden, Ontario
705-286-1860
www.misterc.ca
I do think the fur trade has it\'s place, even if it is unpopular. Fur is warmer than synthetic. I would rather be called up for jury duty than work in a slaugher house, although some crimes against humanity are probably more disgusting than a slaughter house!
As far as going anywhere to find a job...I agree you can, but I disagree that should have to. If a person is single it is usually fairly easy to pack up your belongings and find work where ever, but if you own a home, have a few children to pack up as well it\'s not so easy. I think government should be encouraging new jobs in areas already developed, so that communities are not devastated. You end up with ghost towns otherwise, cause who is going to buy your home if there are no jobs in that area. Plus everytime one town is killed, so are lifestyles, friendships etc., we are not nomadic people, like the Native people once were, and if we expect to form good governments we have to start with groups of people. You can\'t do that if people keep moving, as there are no connection, no loyalties. Why do I care about a body of water being polluted downstream( as an example), first of all, because I\'ve lived beside it forever(or so it seems), it is part of me? Farmers who own the family farm, ought to be helped and encouraged to keep the tradition alive, most of them want to, but end up leaving the farm, because they can\'t sustain a family. That is wrong. When the family leaves the farm so eventually do the towns around the farming, as without families there is no need for the town. A corporation isn\'t likely to walk into town to buy clothing and supplies!
I just think that government ought to be involved in helping to establish communities where communities already exist, that way we are not constantly destroying good farmland etc, to build new communities. Moving shouldn\'t be forced upon people, in order to survive, if you ask a child that lived through years of following a father or mother seeking work, you\'ll mostly hear that their was no sense of home, no connections to community, a constant state of unsettlement. That is not what builds a country, in my opinion.