It found that having patients wait for these procedures cost federal and provincial government revenues a combined $4.4 billion in 2007.
The analysis focused on the costs of "excess waits" -- that is: the cost of waiting for treatment beyond maximum recommended wait times as assessed by the Wait Time Alliance for Timely Access to Health Care.
The study found that "excess waits" rob the economy of workers -- both the patients and their caregivers. They also lead to increased costs on the health care system, as patients need extra appointments, tests and medication. And they cost governments through disability pensions and welfare costs, as well as in lost tax revenue.
The CMA notes that their analysis is conservative. It addresses only the time a patient waits for a treatment or MRI after it has been ordered by a specialist. It does not include the wait in getting to see that specialist -- or even in getting to see one's family doctor.
The solution, the CMA concludes, is simple: reduce wait times.
...
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20080115/wait_times_080115/20080115
Note: http://www.ctv.ca/servl...

The solution, the CMA concludes, is simple: reduce wait times."
No, the CMA are the simple ones! A study on just four procedures excluding the difficulty in getting to a doctor in the first place is meaningless. The CMA can do much to increase the number of doctors being licenced but all the seem to be able to do is produce studies not solutions!
---
When you are up to your ass in alligators it is difficult to remember that the initial objective was to drain the swamp
I'm not to keen on the idea of making it easier to become a Doctor, as there are a lot of bad Doctors out there with the training they have now.
---
The preceding comment deals with mature subject matter, however immaturely presented. Viewer discretion is advised.