Visible Minorities And Racism: More Surveys, More Statistics, Same Problem

Posted on Saturday, November 01 at 10:38 by nuff_respect
If 32% of Black Canadians feel they experienced racism or discrimination more often than South Asian-Canadians or Chinese-Canadians, should they be outraged enough to take their plight into the streets of Toronto or Montreal or Vancouver in an act of protest? Conversely, should South Asian-Canadians or Chinese-Canadians now have a justifiable right to feel good about their social status in Canada because at least they’re not Black?

As I see it, the problem with any statistical analysis of racism is that it is always on a micro-individual level--i.e, founded on the pretense that individual behaviour or attitudes towards minority groups are the root problem. What numbers and percentages do not take into account is the pervasive systemic racist structure of Canadian society, and North American capitalist society for that matter. Being called a racial slur or epithet is not the problem. It is only a symptom of the disease that is so embedded into every facet of our culture that it has become an undetectable beast no one can explain. Individual racist behaviours can be thought of as mere byproducts of that structure.

Racism is not about isolated incidents such as an Iraqi woman from Toronto, who was quoted in the Toronto Star as having been repeatedly told: “Go back to your country.”4 It cuts much deeper than that. It is the depiction of people of colour in the six o’clock news. It is in the stereotypical images of people of colour in movies. It is the invisible glass ceiling that exists at our places of work. It is the lack of representational diversity in the teachers at our schools. Racism lives on because we choose to ignore that the structure of our society is such that it encourages racist practices to continue.

In respect to the Diversity Survey, it is itself part of this overlying structure, because these studies are the only sort of "evidence" of racism that the mainstream (white) culture takes seriously--and the surveys themselves are part of that culture. Even asking people about their experiences with racism is complicated and is affected by the questions asked and by the questioner, says Jeffrey Reitz of the University of Toronto, one of the country’s leading researchers on race.3 In other words, people who experience racism may be reluctant to say exactly what they have gone through when participating in a survey by the dominant culture, and any response they give may very well be affected by the fact that the person asking the question could be a white person.

University of Toronto sociologist Wsevolod Isajiw, an expert in Canada’s multiculturalism and immigration policy, has said “the study, by and large, shows the partial success of our multiculturalism policy. But as we all know, discrimination still exists in our society.”6

Why is it assumed that we all know that discrimination still exists in our society? I would argue that unless you experience it first-hand or are socially conscious enough to question racial assumptions, you do not feel that Canadian society is racist.

I recently had the opportunity to hear bell hooks (all lower case), a renowned black feminist and social activist speak in Toronto. She told the audience about how two white colleagues of hers (both of whom were feminists) raved and praised a movie as one of the best of the year and told her to go see it. When hooks saw the movie, she found it to be one of the most blatantly racist films she had ever seen as it was riddled with stereotypes of black female sexuality and black male misogyny. How could these women, who were feminists and liberal academics, not see what hooks saw?

The reason is that the dominant culture still has not become truly aware of its own racism, despite countless statistics and surveys that have already shown the extent to which visible minorities perceive experiences of racism. Implicit in such research is that it is at the hands of a white person – a member of dominant culture, and removed from the experiences being studied. So why are we doing more surveys on experiences of racism? Why are no surveys being done to expose the pervasiveness of this latter problem?

But ending racism after all is not about looking at statistics or reading surveys; it is about creating true equality for all persons regardless of race. That is, equality in opportunity; equality in proportional representation; and equality in whose story gets told and how. As Dr. Reitz notes further in the _Globe and Mail_ article, "impressions of racism do not decline the longer people live in Canada, especially if they were reared 'with an expectation of equality' in a society that prides itself on openness and acceptance."7 The facts are that the dominant structure and racial hierarchy of our society has virtually remained the same since the colonization of the Native Indians. Mainstream in today’s verbal discourse is really synonymous with white. As long as the mainstream is kept safely secure then all is well. For all those outside the mainstream, any attempt to alter ‘the way things have always been’ is considered a threat to the very facet of our culture.

Should it really have been a shocking surprise that of the groups included in the survey’s visible minority population, Blacks were more likely to report feeling that they had been discriminated against or treated unfairly by others because of their ethno-cultural characteristics?8 Do any of these researchers even remember North American slavery? As a Black Canadian, the subject of such statistical ‘proofs’, I have absolutely no response to this survey or others like it. They carry as much worth as statistics showing that Native Canadians feel disenfranchised in Canadian society. Why do the lived realities of people of colour only mean something when they are quantified and presented in statistical format?

Perhaps when all Canadians are able to have an open discussion on racism things will really begin to shift. Regardless of what any survey says, the truth can’t be white-washed.

Sources:
Visible minorities report racism in study
Ethnic Diversity Study
Racial bias 20% feel the sting

----
Cheryl Thompson is an aspiring writer/journalist living in Toronto, Canada. She has a B.A. in Criminology and is pursuing an M.A. in Media and Communication through Ryerson University. Cheryl believes that part of our survival as human beings is being able to express ourselves, and hopes to be able to influence those who have the power to bring about change through her writing.

Note: Visible minorities repo... Ethnic Diversity Study Racial bias 20% feel th...

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon Nov 03, 2003 8:22 pm
    I don\'t think statistics can ever tell the whole story on any issue, and I would agree unless you have been the victim of racism you really never know the extent of it. I also can\'t relate very well to the idea that the way people are depicted in movies is a reflection of society. I give an example of white\'s in some popular shows today, \'the Trailer Park Boys\' or \'Friends\' etc. I don\'t think this depicts true white behavior, it is meant to entertain. The Cosby\'s was meant to entertain, \'All In the Family\', was a very good satire on racism in America. But really I don\'t think entertainment really reflects culture and if we want that changed then, the people who know must write and get involved in the film industry to bring us a better level of entertainment and education. I do see many more reflections of society in news media and commercials than there have been in the past. I think the real measuring stick will be when we stop noticing people that are different and rather just seeing people. As long as we keep focusing on the differences we\'ll never be able to see the likenesses.

  2. Mon Nov 03, 2003 8:34 pm
    I don\'t think stats are very good at reflecting society. I think the younger generation, as in 20ish year olds are less likely to be racist. I think they are more open minded to getting to know different cultures, they embrace differences better than the older people. For some reason people who may be in a position of hiring, because of age, are more stuck in preconceived or stereotype images, but overall I think the younger generation is more adventurous and curious enough to explore differences whereas older people are afraid of differences, which is where racism comes from FEAR. Music is a perfect example of crossing over of race, in the past, whites had their music, blacks had theirs etc. You don\'t see those race lines in music now, everyone is welcome to share, explore and enjoy music created by all people. The thing that amazes me though is that sometimes when people are crossing the line, someone else speaks up and says \'hey that\'s not your music\' it belongs to this race or that race. So as long as we are territorial about our culture we won\'t be able to share as easily and therefore barriers will be put up. But again, I think it is fear, fear of losing one\'s identity, fear of being exploited because of race, fear of not being celebrated because of race. On and on it goes...

  3. Mon Nov 03, 2003 9:14 pm
    As a real Conservative said (when he wasn\'t gassing Middle Easterners), \"There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.\"

  4. Mon Nov 03, 2003 10:32 pm
    I think also that part of the problem is when people have found their place in the world and are financially well off, whether they are white, black, aboriginal, or asian, so many of these people display an attitude of \'As long as it`s not me.\' So, as long as they are safe and secure in life, then why worry about other injustices? People don`t seem to get outraged about a certain injustice unless it suddenly affects them directly.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  5. Tue Nov 04, 2003 2:16 am
    Dave, please. I thought we could count on more than feel-good crap from you. Do you honestly believe that \"Racism\" exists in large numbers? \"Prejudice\" exists, but racism is much different. Prejudice is: \"The real-estate agent at the open house wouldn\'t pay attention to me at the open house.\" Racism is: \"The Muslims fire-bombed my Catholic house.\" There\'s a difference.

    If anything, we\'ve gone too far in letting our previous, white-Euorpean erode. In the city of Toronto, for example, the most multicultural city in the world, if you\'re living in an increasingly immigrant area, usually a poorer area: your local school probably won\'t have a Canadian football team......but it WILL HAVE A CRICKET TEAM!!! Nothing against cricket, but is it good that the things that previously drew us together are being lost?!! Should a football team not at least be offered, or should we let them bore us to death with cricket, and not teach them anything about what people in Canada have done in the past.

    The farce, is what someone here said: \"We have to stop seeing differences , and start seeing people.\" So a bunch of insecure immigrants whine that people take a interest in their background. How awful!!! Apparently \"What is your background\" is now racist. Go to a Muslim country, and if you get IGNORED -YOU\'RE DOING WELL!!! Either that or being stoned. We don\'t have to create a 100% politically-correct social experiment to satisfy whiny immigrants. They are lucky to be here, and if they don\'t like it -go back to Peru, and walk over their culture instead.

    Canada can\'t be ruined by whiny immigrants. There are plenty of marginalized \"Whites\" who don\'t get paid well, get layed-off, or whatever. Immigrants actually have it easier, because people don\'t expect as much from them. They pity them. Don\'t ask me why.

  6. Tue Nov 04, 2003 2:18 am
    Well, I think differences should be respected, but THEY DO EXIST. Pretending they don\'t won\'t help anything, either. At least we show an interest in differences. In some countries, such as Muslim countries, being ignored is being treated well. Physical violence is to be expected. Lose the meaningless political-correctness.

  7. Tue Nov 04, 2003 2:22 am
    I know, eh?

    Another black person mistaking prejudice for \"Racism\", ie hatred. In her world, a bus full 50 black people, all from Jamaica, -is diversity, but a bus full of white people from 50 different countries is not. Naturally, it\'s the \"Visible\" part of the minority issue that these shallow people respond to.

  8. Tue Nov 04, 2003 3:14 am
    As the writer of the piece I just wanted to add some clarifications. We all have our perceptions of what \'prejudice\' is and what \'racism\' is. First of all, I realize that all of us, regardless of how liberal we think we are or what colour our skin is, are prejudice. I would be the first one to admit that I am, sure of course. But racism goes much deeper than having a bus full of Jamaicans. I mean come on! That\'s also racist. Why must it be all or nothing? All one thing or the other? That\'s the issue. Society functions perfecting well as long as \'norms\' are maintained - the social hierarchy. As a minority, I can\'t afford to be completely in the dark as to believe that we \'all\' have a chance to make it to the \'top\'. Let\'s be realistic, the top must reflect, in a majority sense, those who are at the top. And whose at the top, white men. so having said that, that\'s racism. It\'s not about the little things, like racial slurs or having a cricket team in a minority neighbourhood. It\'s the structures that maintain and remain to keep certain groups 1 step ahead of the rest.

  9. Tue Nov 04, 2003 3:46 am
    The very assumption made by the person above that Cheryl is an immigrant because she is Black (she isn\'t, she\'s Canadian born and raised) demonstrates the sort of assumptions she\'s talking about--ie, that \"normal\" Canadians are white. Yes, it is the \"visible part of the minority that these shallow people respond to\"--it is Cheryl\'s visible blackness that inspired the assumption that she is just a \"whiny immigrant\" who should go back where she \"came from\" (the womb???)

  10. Tue Nov 04, 2003 4:28 am
    Feel good? I don`t feel good about this! All I was trying to say was that yes, there is a 'glass ceiling' still in place, and it`s getting higher and higher due to the assault on social and economic justice in this country, as well as others. Who will you find mostly underneath the glass ceiling? Women, minorities, and ever increasingly, blue collar workers! This isn`t a feel good story at all! But as well, some of the 'tokens' that are accepted with the 'stupid white men' above the glass ceiling suddenly forget to look down! And yes, racism and prejudice in Canada is STILL a big problem, whether we want to admit it or not! Quite frankly, I`m proud of Canada`s multi-cultural heritage, and I believe in a Canada where all people can live and prosper here!!! This in no way diminishes or threatens the British and French traditions that I also hold dear! But to build a country where ALL of us can self-actualize, now THAT`S A FEEL GOOD STORY!!!<p>---<br>Dave Ruston

  11. Tue Nov 04, 2003 5:03 am
    I think self-actualization is a wonderful idea. In fact, I do it everyday. But what\'s ultimately important is to step out of the world of priviledge. And by priviledge I don\'t mean skin colour. I mean, education often alters ones sense of reality, that is what\'s really going on. As a person pursing a graduate degree and living in the \'real world\' I clearly see the difference. Sure, we should all work to achieve our goals and let nothing get in the way. That\'s a wonderfully, sheltered way to look at things. Again, back to what the article was trying to say, we need to look deeper than just the surface of things, and probably the negative remarks and stereotypical comments I have seen sparked from this piece, reflect exactly the hurdle we face as a nation. We all need a serious reality check. If anyone has never had the opportunity to read John Howard Griffin\'s novel, \"Black Like Me\" I highly recommend it. We all don\'t know as much about people - race - as we think we do, and that goes for black, white, yellow, orange. If we base any mature discussion from that starting ground, perhaps we will truly be able to make some sort of change.

    Cheryl

  12. Tue Nov 04, 2003 5:34 am
    I agree with Cheryl about the misunderstandings and a level of maturity lacking in this type of debate. I think that the issue becomes so heated because of fear, fear that one \'group\' of people will get preferential treatment rather than fair treatment. I give an example, when the military decided it needed to have equal women in positions of leadership, it started to promote women over men to meet quotas, sometimes the men resented this because they had but in the time and effort and not been rewarded. I think that often happens when government attempts to placate any sector of society. I think that as the population changes and more people, of various races, sex, religious backgrounds etc. are in positions to hire, we will not see as many \'top ends\' filled with white males. Our country is quite young and the many hurdles people of colour, or women have faced in the past are slowly being erroded and eventually we will have the best person hired for the job, no matter what level of job we are talking about. The immigration problem in this country is not a colour problem it is a government mismanagement problem, which angers the average Canadian who doesn\'t get a fair wage and can\'t support their family. So when they see new immigrants getting \'freebies\' or extra help to start businesses etc. that they can\'t access, it angers them. But again, these are two separate issues. I do however think that our government could do a better job in helping new Canadians to know their new country and it\'s customs, and help them to gain hirer paying jobs and develope relationships with existing Canadians. The division which develops when new Canadians are afraid of their new country and they stick with people from their own culture, the customs from the old country develop here. That is how gangs take advantage of people, ie. the Asia situation in many cities, that target the older people, who are afraid to call police etc. But again, race, prejudice etc. all comes down to fear of the unknown, if we could all put aside our fear, we would learn how very alike we are and embrace our uniqueness. Every person I know, no matter what colour,wants the basics to existance on this planet, food, shelter and decent career to support those things we need and the dreams we wish to fulfill. I still don\'t think statistics will ever reveal the entire story.

  13. Tue Nov 04, 2003 5:04 pm
    <i>Another black person mistaking prejudice for "Racism"</i><p> Well said. I wonder how much of the survey was this type of incident. The black guy cutting some white guy off in traffic, the white guy flipping the bird, the black guy assuming it's a racial issue instead of a 'you put me and my child in the carseat in an unsafe situation' issue. Some people are just too quick to play the 'race' card.<p> This is not directed at anyone in particular, but, I think one of the institutionalized forms of racism is the hyphenated Canadian. As an example by labeling yourself say, as a whatever-Canadian, I believe a person promotes themself as different, and stresses those differences. You might be 4th or 5th generation Canadian, but advertising yourself as Afro- or Christian- or Anglo- is redundant.<p> I can see you are black/white/red/yellow/purple. For the most part, I cannot see what faith you follow. Why advertise it, unless you want it to become an issue? How long till that person considers themself as just "Canadian"?<p> <p>---<br>"History does nor repeat itself, but it does rhyme" Mark Twain

  14. Tue Nov 04, 2003 10:14 pm
    Susan, if you read my post, you will see no mention of Cheryl as an immigrant, let alone a \"Whiny\" immigrant. I\'m simply pointing out the fraud that is \"Diversity.\" It\'s ture that most people see diversity in terms of \"Visible\" diversity, as opposed to diversity of country of origin, religion, experience, opinion, and so forth.

    Personally, I have friends who are of a variety of backgrounds, and played with many recent immigrants as a young kid in a nearby park during the summer. I am simply playing devil\'s advocate and pointing out Cheryl\'s nonsense. Her idea is that we should all be seen as, \"Canadian\" and shouldn\'t dare ask people where they or their family are from. We should ignore obvious differences, and pretend we are all the same. IGNORING OBVIOUS DIFFERENCES IS NO FRIENDLIER THAN ASKING ABOUT THEM. It is representative of Muslim society, where being ignored is the best you can hope for. I\'m sick of having the race card played against me by people who can\'t deconstruct my arguments, because they know I\'m right. It\'s actually much harder to be white, because you CAN\'T SAY ANYTHING! This \"Don\'t go there\" attitude is not tolerance, it\'s crap.

    The fact is, Canada does not owe it to the rest of the world to become so tolerant that our past activities disappear due to lack of support, in the name of some baseless \"Equality.\" Canada\'s goal should we protecting our sovereignty. It isn\'t to create a politically-correct party country. If immigrants benefit, bless their souls, If immigrants don\'t, tough. We don\'t have the room for all of China. We have enough problems here. I say this because a number of Chinese people have told me that millions of Chinese peopel should move to Canada; and that Canada would one say be dominated by a Chinese population.

    (Never mind the insects, I guess.)



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news