To Bad For B.C.

Posted on Tuesday, July 04 at 08:39 by Patm
So you would expect this outpouring of concern to be reflected in the committee's final report, which was released on June 21. But you would be wrong. The Liberal-dominated committee -- and the commercial media reporting the study -- go after the CBC instead. The public broadcaster should get out of sports programming and give up its advertising revenues, the committee recommends. They say to replace the advertising dollars with more public dollars: a recommendation that hasn't a hope of being implemented. The committee wrote that the "core" of its work concerns the "influence on news and information of media ownership in Canada." The senators began looking at the industry after CanWest acquired most of Canada's major dailies and Bell Globemedia took control of the CTV television network and the Globe and Mail. But the study's release was framed around the alleged failings of Canada's public broadcaster. The senators did a classic bait-and-switch ploy: say you're going to do one thing and then do something else to take attention away from your original goal. And in this case, their original goal was to examine media concentration. http://thetyee.ca/Mediacheck/2006/06/29/BigMedia/ [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on July 4, 2006]

Note: http://thetyee.ca/Media...

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by lombar
    Tue Jul 04, 2006 6:01 pm
    Which is worse? Being misinformed or not informed at all? At least being 'not informed' one can avoid ones daily dose of fearmongering. Stop consuming the 'media' and the 'empire' crumbles. Even Asper can't afford to print papers nobody buys.

  2. Wed Jul 05, 2006 7:05 am
    Too bad about the to bad.

    ---
    "We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"

  3. Wed Jul 05, 2006 6:15 pm
    I used to bemoan the fact that my kids never read the paper or watched the news and "lived" on their computers. I now find that I'm glad. They have not read or swallowed the propaganda. It was in their nature to go to the internet for news & diverse views and as a consequence, now have a discerning eye for things like indoctrination and propaganda.

  4. by avatar Jacob
    Thu Jul 06, 2006 12:15 am
    What else can be expected if a Zionist reporter writes an article about a situation where Zionist views are constantly printed and viewed, and this is just because over the years, nobody else has had the guts to say "enough is enough" and start another newspaper?

    Hurrah for cyberspace.

    European countries have never had this concentration of the media; they are just as diverse as the population is. People subscribe to the newspaper that is according to their political persuasion. In Canada and the US, that is rapidly becoming impossible.

  5. Sat Jul 29, 2006 6:20 am
    Why don't we cut to the chase and just have one media outlet for the entire Western World? Good to see that monopolization is alive and well in our "free market capatalist system."

    Europe does not have this problem because they have strong anti-trust legislation. This is why Europeans are much more informed and awake than North Americans when it comes to just about every issue.

    Gotta go, American Idol is on...



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news