"It's a political document that's not really grounded in too much economic reality," the panelist said.
"It's a lot of dread. ... Just seeing it unfold is like a Greek tragedy," the panel member added, saying the government's rejection of so many recommendations was a slap in the face.
As a result, Albertans "absolutely are not" receiving a fair share of the publicly owned oil and gas resources under the new deal.
Instead, the province could actually collect fewer royalties in the future because the government ignored several key recommendations, including an industry-wide oilsands "severance" tax.
"Overall, we could end up with less (in royalties) than we're getting now," the panelist said.
....
http://www.canada.com/edmontonjournal/news/story.html?id=3e714a94-122d-432e-99c9-c952d8dd3642&k=94451
[Proofreader’s note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on October 29, 2007]
Note: http://www.canada.com/e...

---
Dave Ruston
Anyway, looks like the tables are turning somewhat as BC is attracting oil companies with lower royalties while Alberta increases them.
In the bigger picture, this may mean a busy season for the BC Peace region but I'm sure things will return to normal for Alberta once gas prices come up and the oil & gas companies get over it. In the long run, this will be good (well... better anyway) for Albertans than the status quo.
---
Everybody got to deviate from the norm
<br />
<a href="http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/the-rockefellers-funding-fathers-of-the-new-world-order/">http://aftermathnews.wordpress.com/2007/07/23/the-rockefellers-funding-fathers-of-the-new-world-order/</a><p>---<br>"When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do."<br />
<br />
William Blake<br />
<br />