Stick One To The Gipper

Posted on Wednesday, June 16 at 11:15 by Flick
* * *
Stick One to the Gipper

by Adam Hunt

Hey everyone.

Just in time for Ronnie, my many blessings in Thailand now include cable television and the Fox News Channel. So now I can write about TV, instead of obsolete reality.

Why do I watch Fox? Well, why waste time with those dreary, adult news channels, when you can enjoy blond, perky extremists belittling the poor or showing us how gay marriage triggers global warming.

So for the past week, I've been consumed with Fox's coverage of the manufactured spectacle of Reagan grief. On the weekend it climaxed with the burial of the Cadaver-in-Chief at the oxymoronic 'Reagan Library'. Nancy Reagan stage-managed a mythmaking extravaganza, worthy of Jackie O's best work crafting the Camelot legend. Looking rather corpse-like herself, with her skin pulled back behind her skull for the ceremony, Nancy cast a sympathetic figure - even as her meatless body hardly cast a shadow.

My first reaction to her grim, grey solemnity was, 'God, she has a big head for a widow.' The thing is roughly the size of a microwave oven. Balanced on top of the body of a rhesus monkey, the effect grows more cartoonish with each successive facelift. But instead of barfing out sweets like the human Pez dispenser she resembles, she stared on in stoic silence. But what was with those glasses? Apparently you can't maintain the cleanliness of your senile husband's ass AND shop for fashionably appropriate eyewear. These things were right out of my Mom's glove compartment in 1980.

The funeral was Nancy's best performance since pretending to love the Reagan children at White House functions. She massaged the casket, tongued at the flag and generally hammed it up as the world stared. Actually I was somewhat moved by her act, as I get very emotional when I have a hangover. (I was really freaked out by 'Dawn of the Dead' one Sunday afternoon a few weeks ago). The tears struggling to trickle from the corners of her eyes shocked me at first. But if I learned anything from Shrek, it's that monsters have feelings too.

I listened to the cliché-laden eulogies. Former Canadian Prime Minister Brian Mulroney's moved me the most. Or at least, it moved the digesting food from my stomach, up through my esophagus and out my nostrils and mouth. The Gipper and PM BM forged a deep bond of crony-ship throughout the eighties. They shared much in common: Irish roots, conniving wives who spent more on shoes than their husbands' administrations spent on famine relief and the ability to escape prison terms for various nefarious deeds and corruptions.

Fox carried barely a word about the real Reagan legacy: the crippling pit of national debt, the illegal support of murderous dictators, the shoving of the welfare poor onto the streets, the rape of environmental law, the industry deregulation that led to scandal and fatality.

Fox's one moment of 'balance' came when Ted Rall was interviewed about a cruel obit he wrote. But it was less an interview than a flogging with the host repeating several versions of the following insults until the 3 minutes were up: 'You are mean, you are cruel, you are a nasty person... You are heartless, you are..' Those tuning in mid-rant, may have mistaken the host's tirade for the real Reagan eulogy.

Reagan was a guy who claimed trees cause global warming and elk rub up against gas pipelines to stay warm. The man had made dozens of public mentions of jelly beans (his favourite snack) before ever uttering the word 'AIDS' in public in 1985. He also had a bit of a fantasy/reality issue. He even claimed on two separate occasions that as a soldier he helped liberate Nazi death camps (Um - he was an actor during the war).

He invested enough cash in a quirky, little start-up called the Afghani Mujaheddin, that its supporters were able to topple a couple skyscrapers 20 years later. He illegally sold missiles to the mullahs of Iran (supposedly a hated enemy, who had kidnapped dozens of US hostages) and funnelled the proceeds to a drug-running death squad in Nicaragua.

But Ronnie smiled and winked and Americans forgave the big lug. You gotta break some eggs to make an omelette and fightin' commies was breakfast enough to feed Madeline Albright on a 15 drink hangover.

But by all accounts Reagan had a deep well of compassion when confronted with a sad child or an injured puppy. He choked up and clutched them to his impressive man-bosom. (I saw a shirtless pic - he had breasts the size of Oprah Winfrey's). But once finished with the emoting and hugging, he returned to his ranch to snack on the barbecued limbs of homeless people and chuckle over photos of Central American torture victims.

Sure, I admired his sunny optimism. As I admired Hitler's ability to capture the German landscape in attractive watercolours. Or Muammar Kadaffi's gift for accessorizing his muumuu with the perfect pistol holster. And some analysts would like to starve the Reagan legacy of any credit for toppling the evil empire. I will give him some for quickening the pace.

But Americans seem to love leaders who can tell jokes, make them feel comfortable, show affability. These are important traits in a birthday party clown, but not necessary for a president.

Sure, I love zany anecdotes and I'd bow my head for the occasional presidential noogy. Reagan was likeable on a personal level. Likewise Bush. But I think a truer test of character is a person's policy decisions. How many people would a great leader let die for lower taxes? How many villages would he burn for an ideology or for cheap oil? In my value system, I prefer a guy who tries to help the world's afflicted to the one who can get the most laughs with his armpit farts.

Finally, the open sores are scabbing over on this weeklong funereal disease that led the media to focus on a dead man's sunny personality rather than his sinister policies. Now maybe a true examination of Reagan's legacy can take place. I hope it will warn voters of the dangers of electing affable, dim-witted, rosy-cheeked clowns. Otherwise, John Kerry better learn how to make balloon animals real quick.

(Ok, next time, maybe I'll update you about MY life. First, I need to turn off the TV and return to having some of my own experiences. But nostalgia for the dead is fun. So fun for some, in fact, that the newly rejuvenated Bush campaign is considering having Barbara clubbed to death just before the September convention. Anyway, you can still write me back, even if this seems more like an ugly polemic than a personal update.)

Your Ugly Polemicist,
Adam

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Jun 16, 2004 6:19 pm
    That was great! I wish people would email me stuff like that rather than the "Bill Gates will pay you a billion dollars if you foreward this tripe onto 10 other suckers in the next 15 seconds"<p> I'll bet Mulroney being there just burned Bush Jr. The first non-american to eulogise a president. Probabally irked him as much as Castro turning up for Trudeau's funeral.<p> <p>---<br>"History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme" Mark Twain <br />
    "The greatest price of not participating in politics is being governed by your inferiors." Plato

  2. Wed Jun 16, 2004 6:43 pm
    Thanks for a great laugh...indeed he said what I'm sure many were thinking...they did report this funeral had been planned and replanned for many years, truly it was as choreographed as any movie and I also thought it was an attempt to recreate the image of JFK...it fell short to say the least...

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  3. Thu Jun 17, 2004 3:51 am
    Wow. That was hilarious. I like the comparison between Nancy and Jackie O. The whole thing felt stage-managed. I think Nancy was really calculating that this would get Ron on the 10 dollar bill. And maybe Rushmore. Gasp!

  4. Thu Jun 17, 2004 3:59 am
    Flick has very amusing friends.

    I read a satirical (maybe I should have posted it), article an American comic wrote calling Canada an ingrate for not changing our name to Ronald Regan after all that he had done for this country.

  5. Thu Jun 17, 2004 2:34 pm
    Yeah, pretty funny!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  6. Fri Jun 18, 2004 6:57 am
    Every leader is very concerned with how history will view him or her, and your last gasp at holding on to it is your funeral. i can imagine what Clinton's funeral would be like if he were alive to plan it. All too often in Canada, we spit on our leaders once they get out of office. Although scandals that are later unearthed usually have something to do with that. What will Chretien's funeral be like? I betcha Mila will do her best to pull off something similar to the Reagan thing. The sad thing is, i think the Chretiens and the Mulroneys think that there are a plurality of Canadians who really love them. The funerals will be doubly sad to see the lack of emotional outpouring.

  7. Fri Jun 18, 2004 7:19 am
    True, but don't you think that if you plan ahead as they apparently did, you ought to know if you served the country or just screwed them over, I mean I'd hate to be heading to the otherside with a funeral like that on my plate to answer for, along with a lifetime of deeds!

    Like really, you know what you are, you have to look yourself in the mirror everyday, even if you can fool your wife, you know...I think these people are incredibly arrogant to screw the country once and then do it again as they're leaving...the country after all gets the bill!

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  8. by L. Ray
    Sun Jun 20, 2004 7:39 pm
    An interesting article by Frank Rich a NYT columnist I usually enjoy reading <br><br> What O. J. Passed to the Gipper <br><br> ".... So went the seven days of Reagan. As we now know, the former president's aides and family had devised some of the settings years in advance through a secret plan they code-named Operation Serenade: the camera angles and sunset timing of the California service, the distribution of 50,000 small American flags to extras organized along the route. Such Old Hollywood cinematic touches no doubt seemed clever when the Reaganauts first hatched them, but by the time of Reagan's death they were as dated as "Bedtime for Bonzo." The post-O. J. arsenal of media weapons all but upstaged the prissy soundstage pageantry. Unchanging, lachrymose platitudes were repeated histrionically again and again day after day, padded out with faux controversies (will Reagan wipe Andrew Jackson off the $20 bill, Alexander Hamilton off the $10 bill, or J.F.K. off the half-dollar?) and the musings of third-tier experts like Gahl Burt, "former Reagan social secretary." When all else failed, non-celebrated victims of Alzheimer's were rolled on to CNN to supply some collateral tragedy. Network anchors interviewed former colleagues like Cokie and Sam, who were happy to airbrush the history of the presidency they covered as payoff for reliving their own salad days as TV stars... <br><br> A total of some 200,000 Americans passed by the coffin in California and Washington. The crowds watching the funeral procession in Washington numbered in the "tens of thousands," reported The Washington Post. By comparison, three million Americans greeted the cross-country journey of Warren Harding's funeral train from San Francisco to Washington when he died in office in the steamy August of 1923, according to Mark Sullivan's history, "Our Times." It took 3,500 soldiers to direct the crowd in his hometown of Marion, Ohio, alone. The grief for Harding was so pronounced in New York, a city that hardly knew him, that The Times reported how theaters canceled their shows to hold impromptu memorial gatherings for those citizens unable to jam into the packed services held in Trinity Church at Wall Street and Temple Emanu-El uptown and most houses of worship in between. Next to that, the Reagan outpouring, much of it carried out by bubbly TV-camera-seeking citizens in halter tops and shorts, was grief lite....." <br><br> http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/20/arts/20RICH.html?position=&th=&pagewanted=print&position= <br><br> Subscription required; they never send junk mail, just an ad every few months.

  9. Tue Jun 22, 2004 8:37 pm
    Mike Mike Mike. *shakes head*.<p><p>---<br>"History does not repeat itself, but it does rhyme" Mark Twain <br />
    "The greatest price of not participating in politics is being governed by your inferiors." Plato

  10. Wed Jun 23, 2004 5:04 pm
    "Dr. Caleb"
    You complain about some of my posting's not conributing to the discussion? does "stick one the gipper" do so? Once again the liberals show their true color: arogance, hatefulness, hypocrisy. Is this article really necessary? You talk about compassion? How about good manners. If you are really concerned about a discussion, a meaningful intelligent one, then this article should be removed and you should post an apology not only for this article, but your own comments regarding it.

    Mike

  11. by avatar Jesse
    Wed Jun 23, 2004 7:15 pm
    <blockquote>"Dr. Caleb" You complain about some of my posting's not conributing to the discussion? does "stick one the gipper" do so? Once again the liberals show their true color: arogance, hatefulness, hypocrisy. Is this article really necessary? You talk about compassion? How about good manners. If you are really concerned about a discussion, a meaningful intelligent one, then this article should be removed and you should post an apology not only for this article, but your own comments regarding it.</blockquote> <p> Mike, Dr Caleb is one of our moderators and is only following the guidelines set out in the <a href="http://www.vivelecanada.ca/staticpages/index.php?page=20030129012844787">FAQ</a>. (please refer to the section on "why did my comment get deleted"). <p> Further, Dr Caleb didn't write the article; he may not even have approved it (I could check the logs, but it's just as likely that I approved it). He owes no one an apology. <p> Your comments, including such wisdom as "stick it up your ass", are merely rude and ignorant. In comparison, the article was well written and satirical. Dr Caleb's comment is about Bush's reaction to Mulroney giving a eulogy. He's not swearing, he's not insulting people. Your comments that have been deleted were <b>not</b> contributing anything useful to the discussion. If you've got something constructive to say, then by all means do so. Otherwise, I will ask you to go insult people elsewhere. <p>---<br>Jesse <br />

  12. Thu Jun 24, 2004 4:57 am
    Satire is one of the best ways to get a point across, without insulting directly and allowing comic relief for extremely difficult topics of discussion. People use satire to laugh at otherwise horrific situations and spending mega bucks of American's tax dollars, when they have so few to spend,to orgestrate a funeral of such magnitude and with so much pomp and circumstance can only be described with satire! Particularly when you realize that the media was painting the man as a fictional character, rather than the human being he was, faults and all!

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  13. Thu Jun 24, 2004 4:37 pm
    This article goes beyond satire. It personally attacks the Reagans which is totally uncalled for at this time. Yes it was planned, just like all funerals are, I am 36 and my funeral was planned when I was in my twenties, it's called being prepared. Comparing Reagans funeral to JFK'S is like comparing apples to oranges. Let alone to Hardings in 1923, sure 3 million showed up, considering that his body was transported via train versus flying. I am sure if Reagans body was transported the same way I am positive miilions would have done the same thing. JFK was assassinated while in office, while President Reagan wasted away by a terrible disease. And considering that the media here is on the left side of the fence I was supprised that their coverage was what it was. And to be frank I met Ronald Reagan and Nancy on several occasions while serving in the U.S. Marines. You may disagree with his policies, but insulting him and his wife personally is low, and shows a complete lack of class. stick to the issue's.

    Mike

  14. Tue Jun 29, 2004 5:28 pm
    Re: a satirical view of Reagan's funeral

    "It shows a lack of class"...

    well, yes. A lack of the upper class "protect your own"
    sensibility that the Reagans (and Thatchers and
    Mulroneys and Bushes ad nauseam) perhaps.
    A lack of respect for the class authority that goes with
    being rich and conservative. In this case satire is
    perhaps the most palatable and tactful way to tell upper
    class people:
    "We do not aspire to be or live like you, although you
    desperately need to believe that we do. Though you'll
    spend millions on orchestrated TV spectaculars to
    reinforce your myths of class superiority, we will
    continue to mock your myopic and suicidal
    megalomania."

    Garth
    garth(at)sfu(dot)ca



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news