When The Elephant Falls

Posted on Thursday, September 22 at 10:56 by Marcus
If this apparent alliance breaks, Canada would be on the front line. Our economy is deeply integrated within North America; net exports to the United States (subtracting imports used to create exports) represent about 22% of Canadian GDP. This concentration has already exposed Canada to the U.S. dollar's depreciation more heavily than our international competition. Weak exports to the States have led the Conference Board to lower its 2005 Canadian growth forecast to 2.5%, down from the 2.9% increase achieved in 2004. That reinforces the importance of aggressively seeking trade and investment beyond the United States.

We see the U.S. external deficit peaking this year, as export growth in 2005 begins to outpace import growth. The U.S. fiscal deficit, meanwhile, will be smaller than expected due to slower spending growth and higher corporate tax revenues. Nevertheless, we should not forget the concerns voiced last spring by Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan that U.S. growth will be impaired without faster action to address the fiscal deficit.

How will the global imbalances be corrected? So far, the decline in the U.S. dollar has carried the full adjustment burden, with a negative impact on Canadian export growth. A better way to reduce the imbalances would be through co-ordinated action by the major industrial countries--the so-called G7, plus China as an emerging power. The other major industrial countries, however, have their own domestic imbalances. They and the United States have been unwilling, and unable, to take co-ordinated macro-economic action. China just took a step toward greater exchange-rate flexibility, although its actual currency policy is not at all transparent--and a steadily rising yuan would reduce China's incentive to keep acquiring U.S. assets.

Because global imbalances are not being addressed adequately, the U.S. currency will face added downward pressure, and U.S. interest rates will inevitably face upward pressure across the yield curve. Long rates are remarkably low today. There is little hard evidence of concern among foreign or domestic investors, but markets will adjust quickly if there is a change in sentiment. The signal that Asian investors are reducing the share of their assets held in U.S. dollars is serious. And the adjustment in the U.S. dollar and interest rates could be sharp.

Canada cannot avoid external shocks, but we can try to mitigate them. Thanks to a painful but necessary domestic fiscal adjustment during the 1990s, we have the advantage of a strong macro-economic foundation: low inflation and improved fiscal balances for most governments across the country. We will need that foundation as a buffer against external shocks to the exchange rate, interest rates and economic growth.

Should we choose, we can also use this position of strength to diversify further our global business activities. Our much-improved national fiscal position gives us the capacity to address shortcomings in infrastructure--at the border, in our cities and across the economy. We are in a strong bargaining position to influence other countries and improve international policy co-ordination. The question that remains unanswered is whether we can find the political will to act, reduce our trade bottlenecks and help create those added shock absorbers.

Link to article @ canadianbusiness.com [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on September 25, 2005]

Note: Link to article @ canad...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by avatar Jesse
    Thu Sep 22, 2005 6:16 pm
    The only way to avoid being crushed by the falling elephant is to build stronger economic ties with the EU and china. Though it might actually take an economic collapse to convince Canadian businesses to seek better markets instead of the most convenient ones...

    ---
    Every time you complain about the moderators, god kills a kitten.

  2. Fri Sep 23, 2005 4:21 pm
    Any economy based on exports is an economy of fools and bound to collapse sooner or later. The export of resources, such as wanted by India or China, is another fools paradise, as it is not an income, but the sale of capital. Therefore, building up such contacts is a way to suicide.

    The only way to survival at any scale, from the individual to national and global, is the building and maintaining of the greatest possible degree of self sufficiency, regardless what our brainwashed economists are preaching.

    Globalization and export based economies are the recipe of societal suicide, destroying the lives of billions.

    Now the question comes up, whether governments are supposed to "subsidize" self sufficiency ? First of all, what's the definition of a subsidy? There's none. The presently used, distorted version is just another baloney by nutty economists, the most dangerous people on Earth. Apart from architects, filling our lives with hopelessness and ugliness.

    All government actions are forms of subsidies, because it is the duty of governments to divert energies to the sectors that need them. This doesn't mean the sudsidization of exports, or profits, but the needs of survival, well being and environmental protection. Subsidizing export economies is a criminal act to steal from others.

    At this time, our so called "free trade" and "globalization" hysterias are the biggest subsidies that have turned into the biggest crime waves in history, yet are being taught as "good neoclassical economics".

    The first thing to do is to transfer university economics departments to divinity and theology, because their teachings are nothing more, or less, than the pseudo religions of the new colonization and exploitation in the name of the Money God Who Liveth in computers.

    Then start breaking up major corporations and conglomerates under long existing laws and start rebuilding small, locally based energy and resource based enterprises and economies
    to reach the greatest degree of indivildual, family, community, regional and national self sufficiency as possible and use theory of local advantages for genuine trade between societies at all levels. 100 small businesses employing 10 people each are far more worth and sustainable for any economy than 1 business employing 1,000.

    By the way, we have done it most of our lives and now can live very well on very little, and wouldn't change any of it. So, it can be done and will be one day, when the elephant keels over and professors of economics will become street sweepers. When the economic apocalypse comes, we can thank our economists for it. Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.

  3. Fri Sep 23, 2005 5:35 pm
    When the Elephant falls, we shall move forward. The elephant has many more babies to look after than we in Canada do.
    What do you think willhappen when 350 million Americans wake up and learn that the only economic surviors are the people they gave power to? If you think Enron, World Com and alike put alot of people into bankruptsy, look when this elephant turn into elephant poop.

    ED Deeks: you are right on again my friend.

    ---
    Good government is not a party government

  4. Sat Sep 24, 2005 2:08 am
    That's right Ed! Remember theologian George Grant when he talked about how the United States dragged us and other nations into an unsustainable, liberal society built on technology, inevitable progress. I think that it would have happened everntually anyway, but they U.S. took the technological lead in many areas and wouldn't stop.....Britain did start industrialism though, and Grant was very sympathetic of British culture.

  5. by avatar Jesse
    Sat Sep 24, 2005 8:44 am
    Technology does not always imply progress. Many technologies are used for things like Mutually Assured Destruction, which the US also dragged us into. Followed by BMD and an unwinnable War on Terror using the latest Lockheed-Martin technologies!

    ---
    Every time you complain about the moderators, god kills a kitten.

  6. by Patm
    Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:03 pm
    Why do all these idiotic economists and business reporters always want to move goods across borders? Is there some sort of divine holiness attached to selling products out of the country?

    What good is building up a reserve of foriegn currency which is not legal tender in our own country? It just forces us into lending it back to the country from which it came (funding an unfair short-term advantage to that country) or to trade it off on the currency markets, further destabalizing that currency's value.

    Why does the government think that American military contractors are more suited to carrying out the next Canadian census than Canadians are? All they are doing is *paying* the US intelligence service to take Canadians personal information instead of letting them spend their own money in order to steal it - as is the tradition.

    Why does the BC government think American firms are better suited to keeping BC medical records than the people of BC are? Of course the real answer is to let the US HMOs get their hands on all the data to better tailor their assistance in the neo-con/Liberals sabotage of the public health system, but they cannot come out and say that publically.

    Stop pushing Canada further and further into the colonial economic model with its purpose of enslaving the colony to the colonial masters. Rebuild the economic powerhouse of the middle 20th century with its strong internal trade and excellent standard of living. Cut crime rates by allowing people to work instead of forcing people into unemployment, welfare, and homelessness though mandated, artificial, and morally repugnant unemployment rates just to create a labour surplus and thus, lower real wages to bolster corporate bottom lines.

    In short, lets get a government that wants to govern a democracy instead of corporations that want to rule a flock of mild but industrious animals.

  7. by RPW
    Sat Sep 24, 2005 3:41 pm
    By God, Ed! How old fashioned! How true! Those who have thier hands on our primary resources are the self-same people who shout "globalization" from the rooftops (penthouse that is). If they acquiese at all from trading with the American elephant, they merely switch exporting more of the same to India, China, et al. The whole notion of independent R&D with an eye to self-sufficiency died with the Arrow..............

    ---
    RickW

  8. Sat Sep 24, 2005 4:06 pm
    Excellent points and questions I've been asking myself for 20 years. Here we have to go back to the physical reality of energy control necessary both for survival and exploitation.
    Once again "Wealth can not be created, or earned, only taken". "Costs can not be cut, only transferred". Both of which can be only be done either with criminal, or legalized criminal actions.

    Having come into economics from history, the only answer I can come up with to all of these questions is the age old conspiracy for energy control, stealing wealth, by the 3 perennial ruling classes:

    The Merchants, now represented by the banks and multinationals who develop the demands for exploitation.

    The Priesthoods who develop the philosophies for the legalization of exploitation, calling it the "will of the gods", now represented by economists in service of the Money God.

    The Military who executes the dirty work, hoping for the absolution of their crimes by the Priests.

    In the present neocon and neolib theory and execution of globalization we can clearly see the workings of this conspiracy.

    The main purpose of free trade and globalization, developed and enforced by the above three sectors, is the creation of incompetence through specialization, enslaving humanity into their service and enrichment.

    Professional and talent sectors are always international. A dentist in China has more in common with a dentist in Canada than they have with a teacher, or carpenter in their own countries. The same goes for the above three ruling classes, who, in spite of their claims to the contrary, are international brothers under the skin. E.g. Professional soldiers have been the biggest traitors and turncoats in history, as long as they can have weapons in their hands and fancy uniforms, the flag they fight and kill under makes little difference to them.

    This was the reason for the establishment of the Bilderbergers, the Trilateral Commission, the World Economic Forum, the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund etc. etc. All designed to unite the international exploiter classes, cloak their crimes under the flags of respectability and legality with so called "free trade agreements", in reality international treaties for the dispossession and enslavement of their own peoples, and justify it with the criminal theories of neoclassical economics taught in our universities.

    Note that no economist is ever taking part in any of these blogs and forums, because they know they haven't the chance of a snowflake in hell to justify their idiocies. I took part in several Work Bank international forums, involving thousands from all over the world, and the silence of neoclassical economists was deafening. So, they go after politicians, who have long lost any touch with realities and are ripe for the absorption of any theory that can keep them in power.

    There's no need to buy and read long and expensive books, just go to google and type in "Bilderberger Conferences", "Trilateral Commission" etc. and you can read their history and actions from all angles and sides for and against.

    Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news