Math Didn't Add Up For The Tories

Posted on Wednesday, July 07 at 14:01 by N Say

Since 1997, the mantra has been that if only the Reform/Alliance and Progressive Conservatives would "get together" then "vote splitting on the right" would end. On the altar of this logic, the Progressive Conservative Party of Canada was sacrificed. It was regrettable to bring to an end Canada's oldest political party, but necessary. One party rule would end, democracy would be restored.

Those who raised their voices in defence of the only party that has ever defeated the Liberals, were treated to a chorus of boos. Could we not do the math? Once the Alliance and PCs were merged, the new party would receive the total of the two parties' votes. In fact, we were assured, one plus one would equal more than two. The new party would exceed the combined total of the two parties. When Joe Clark stood against the Reform drive in the late 1990s to take over the PC party, he was admonished by Preston Manning to "think big."

In 2003, from the helm of the Alliance, Stephen Harper told Progressive Conservatives they must choose between "a coalition with David Orchard or with real Conservatives."

To help them choose, the PC constitution was mangled and 20,000 Alliance members were allowed to join the PC party and then vote twice, i.e. in both parties, in a sham ratification process quickly trumpeted to the nation as a 90 per cent endorsement of the merger.

Peter MacKay's signed pledge not to merge with the Alliance and to honour the PC constitution, given in exchange for the leadership, was tossed to the wind. Never mind the constitutional and ethical niceties, politics is a blood sport, and besides the end was worth it. Liberal rule would be over.

From a position of great moral superiority, Harper and MacKay attacked the Liberals for their lack of ethics. Brian Mulroney warmly embraced Stephen Harper and told us the merger was a good thing. He gave Canadians his opinion that this election had the hallmarks of his 1984 sweep.

Stephen Harper announced that his new party was headed for a majority. The Liberals, he said on the eve of the election, were about to receive "the most humiliating defeat" in their history.

As the votes were being counted, Elmer MacKay proudly told the nation, "This long, trying election night wouldn't have happened without Peter MacKay," his son's work was about to "bear fruit for the Canadian political system."

Perhaps, in the cold light of dawn, it is worth examining this fruit.

Here's the rest, check it out.

Note: Here

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Thu Jul 08, 2004 2:57 pm
    Regardless of the naysayers, the new Conservative Party did well considering it was created mere weeks before an election was called. Paul Martin knew that he could make the new party look bad, brand them with a bad impression, if he hit them hard and fast, before they could hold a policy convention or establish a solid order within the party. Martin's shrewd maneouvre ultimately worked out well for him, the Conservatives didn't stand a chance a couple of months ago, then started polling really well, but were cut back by a slick Liberal media machine. It would be shocking if this strategy had not worked out well for the Liberals, they plow our tax dollars into media by any means necessary - including theft - and their friends simply payed them back in their gratitude. Our money talks.

  2. Thu Jul 08, 2004 4:09 pm
    Ugh, those Liberal ads were the least slick campaign ads I can remember, certainly the worst of this election IMO. Not that the Cons' ads were much better, but they at least had colour and something resembling a human face even if it had all the warmth of Ellesmere. <p>I think the Cons' slip had more to do with cuddling up to Mr NAFTA GST Roll-the-Dice. When is this group going to realise snogging Brian Mulroney is not a winning strategem? I mean he was only so offensive that the party lost official status in his wake...

  3. Thu Jul 08, 2004 5:46 pm
    Thats BS. The conservatives were poised to win the election, right up until election night. Paul Martins attack ads were proving quite ineffective. They had been running for weeks without seeing much effect. It was only when Randy White said he would redefine the Charter Of Rights using the notwithsatnding clause. It was only then that all the fears people had about this party were confirmed. Not to mention Harpers comments about bilingualism (Ummm, hello... you're trying to win seats in QUEBEC dumbass). Stephen Harper blew it, big time. He lost the election,it wasn't the "slick liberal media machine"

    Oh, and one other thing, this Party was NOT created mere weeks before the election. It was created over a decade ago, by Preston Manning. This is now, and always will be, the Reform party. No matter how many times they change their name.

  4. Fri Jul 09, 2004 8:26 am
    I never did understand why the Cons wanted to create a new party within the year an election would be called anyway? Did they think that if they gave the public short notice on their, what proved to be undeveloped coverup campaign we'd all vote for them? The short notice thing also had nothing to do with your being losers. Face it already! When are you going to realize we're not a group of Con sympathizers?

  5. by hoopoe
    Sun Jul 11, 2004 4:13 am
    The only BS that was going on was Harper's fantasy that he was going to form any government, never mind a majority government. With all the polls that were published during this election, what wasn't given much attention was that there was a huge percentage of voters at any time that were undecided or not firmly decided; in other words, many people waiting to see if they should use their vote strategically to ensure the cons didn't get anywhere near the reigns of power.

    I agree that this is the the new conservative party is really the reform/alliance and most Canadians recognize this. They also recognize that Harper was not being open and forthright about what his real agenda was, which was to Americanize this country. I mean, talk about attack ads, the cons talked nothing about what their policies were during the whole campaign but focused completely on the liberal party.

    I certainly haven't been able to figure out why any party would embrace Brian Mulroney with the idea that he is some kind of asset to them. This has to be the most hated man in this country. He handed this country even more to the rich and left it in a shambles when he left office, leaving poor Kim Campbell to take the fall losing all but 2 seats from a previous majority government, as I remember.

  6. Sun Jul 11, 2004 7:54 am
    Comment above: 'I certainly haven't been able to figure out why any party would embrace Brian Mulroney with the idea that he is some kind of asset to them'

    Could it be because he is the man and ideology behind the party? He lost his party, he nearly lost us the country but he did not succeed in his plan, therefore here we go again. I believe there is a definite plan to overthrow the people of this country in favor of corporate rule and we are just beginning to see the signs that have been working for many years.

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  7. Sun Jul 11, 2004 4:06 pm
    Yeah, it seems to me that the traitor Mulroney is running the conservatives by proxy.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  8. Thu Mar 17, 2005 1:28 pm
    I think Harper knew that by promising to send troops to iraq
    , and cozy up even moore to the U.S he was scaring peolpe into voting for martin who the continentals knew they had by the balls. If they had gotten the blanque check who knows where we would be? Is John Manley the next decoy?



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news