Experts Call For Release Of 9/11 Evidence

Posted on Friday, March 03 at 11:07 by 4Canada
"It is outrageous that the government is withholding this vital information", said James H. Fetzer, founder and co-chair of the society. "This concerns one of the monstrous events of our time and deserves to be in the public domain." The group, whose members include such prominent figures as David Ray Griffin, Morgan Reynolds, John McMurtry, Wayne Madsen, Robert Bowman, Webster Tarpley, and Andreas von Buelow, has been speaking out against what its own research suggests has been complicity by elements of the administration in the crime. http://news.yahoo.com/s/prweb/20060301/bs_prweb/prweb352979_1

Note: http://news.yahoo.com/s...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:05 am
    If this war on terror were to be found fictional as I think it is. All of our great western coalitions would be a sham. The powers that be will simply not let that happen. This would make the wars in afganistan and Iraq illegal (even by american guidelines). Then the nearly bankrupt americans would be called to pay war reparations as would we in Canada and others. No, it simply would not happen. The shroud of supposed freedom and liberty would be raised to reveal the truth. And like Jack Nicholson said (You can't handle the truth).

  2. Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:23 am
    "No, it simply would not happen!"

    I agree. If at any time the "real truth" was discovered, it would never be revealed. If such a conspiracy did in fact happen, there would be to much to loose even by the innocent. Today, not is all revealed in respect to Vietnam nor the 2nd world war for that matter. Returning solders have little voices and would be publicly ostracised if they didn't. Governments would go bankrupt as you indicated but even worse, no law would remain valid. Chaos in the streets. People would no longer recognise a government.

    We can guess for the rest of our lives and honestly believe one way or the other BUT we will never be sure. Even today some believe the Murder of Kennedy was not what is reported.



    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  3. Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:35 am
    It just may happen, the Scholars for 9/11 truth are raising quite a stink.<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.st911.org">www.st911.org</a><br />
    <br />
    Time will tell, but I'm cautiously optimistic. Anyone seen this video yet?<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.911blogger.com/2006/02/911-revisited.html">http://www.911blogger.com/2006/02/911-revisited.html</a>

  4. by avatar Milton
    Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:50 pm
    So,boflaade and MallIus, you are saying that a sham democracy (dictatorship in disguise) is preferable to ripping off the dead skin of the cacoon and emerging into the light anew. Afraid to be born, are we? Guess what your choices are? You are either going to get busy being born or get busy dying!


    ---

    "Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."
    (Albert Einstein)

  5. Sat Mar 04, 2006 9:43 pm
    you are saying that a sham democracy (dictatorship in disguise) is preferable to ripping off the dead skin of the cacoon .....<

    Perhaps if you read my post, you would discover that you, yourself verify what I am saying. Already you presume I support the coverup and retaliated. The fact is, there will always be a coverup and there is nothing you can/will do about it. If there were facts revealed, you yourself would already assume the position of attack. Perhaps if one would step back and approach with reason, there would be more likelyhood the facts could be examined. In other words, jumping off the handle won't solve the mystery. Don't presume what I think!

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  6. by avatar Milton
    Sun Mar 05, 2006 3:36 pm
    I thought you said that if the truth was known that it would not be told because yada yada yada. Perhaps if you looked for the truth you would find it. Truth hurts therefore we can't have the truth? Excuse me but how do you know that? You justify cover ups as being for our own good?

    All I want is the truth.

    ---

    "Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."
    (Albert Einstein)

  7. Mon Mar 06, 2006 10:56 pm
    >>You justify cover ups as being for our own good? <<

    I gave you "facts" as to why it would be presumed not to reveal the truth. We will not be told the truth because those who know it,will give those excuses. You don't like it nor would anyone else. None the less, we won't and thats fact. You won't get the truth. That's fact. Don't shoot the messenger. You are already assuming you know the facts and presume the facts aren't good. You are more then willing to except the negative. Being bias don't make it true.



    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  8. by avatar Milton
    Tue Mar 07, 2006 4:26 pm
    Who is it that you think has the truth and why do you think that nobody other than them can know the truth? "They" are not the only ones who can conduct an investigation. Being biased is declaring that the truth will not be told and that there is nothing to be done about it.

    ---

    "Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."
    (Albert Einstein)

  9. Tue Mar 07, 2006 11:24 pm
    Who is it that you think has the truth and why do you think that nobody other than them can know the truth? <<

    Those who may or may not have caused the conspiracy.

    You assume there is a conspiracy simply because someone says there is. Those investigating the 911 events and not under control of the government, may or may not be as bias as you. I had at no point, said the supposed conspirators are the only one's to know, but they certainly know more then those who are trying to get evidence on them. They certainly know more then you, yet you are unwilling to consider that maybe those who are making the accusations have a person gain as well.

    I repeat my self: There will never be a conclusive argument as to the "real" facts. Evidence created and lost will make it impossible. This the "Aluminatus Triology" in real life. And as you know, it had no conclusion either.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  10. by avatar Milton
    Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:10 pm
    It is the evidence that should be considered. No need to argue. Gravity exists or it does not. So when the evidence is considered one can dispense with the official explanations because they are not buttressed with facts. Once the official explanation is shown to be propaganda there is no reason to pursue the officials for the truth. The investigation shifts away from officialdom and towards examining the evidence ourselves. Why ask a liar to explain their lies. Their is a wealth of evidence which shows that a coup d'etat (of sorts) is taking place. The question is what we should now do.

    What took place on Sept 11, 2001 is not the only conspiracy event taking place but it is a key turning point. If we do not recognize how we have been and are being snookered we have liitle chance of survival. We do not require that our officials give us the truth. They are liars and liars are not to be trusted. We can find out the truth for ourselves.

    ---

    "Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."
    (Albert Einstein)



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news