Simply Taxing

Posted on Tuesday, April 05 at 11:08 by 4Canada
The Bahamian government is financed almost entirely by formidable import duties, in the range of 35% to 50%. Added to heavy shipping costs, these duties result in a price of US$9 for an eight-foot two-by-four, at least four times what that same piece of wood costs in Arichat. But Bahamians pay no other taxes — no income tax, no property tax, no sales tax. When you buy a $5 item in the Bahamas, you just hand the clerk a $5 bill. No calculations, nothing extra, no groping for change. It makes a person think. Taxes are the price of public services. They enable citizens to do useful things collectively — like providing schools, hospitals, roads, policing and defense. A civilized society also makes systematic provisions for the basic well-being of its members. It supplies them with health care and education, and if necessary, food and shelter. It doesn’t leave basic needs to chance or charity. It all takes money. But the necessity of taxes doesn’t justify the appalling complexity and incoherence of the Canadian tax system. We have a thousand taxes, federal and provincial and municipal, each with inclusions, exemptions, credits, penalties and loopholes. We pay sales tax on hamburgers, but not on hamburger meat. In some places, seniors get rebates on their property taxes. Sometimes income is income; other times it’s dividends or capital gains. And all these taxes interact with one another in unexpected ways. The result is a dense cobweb of complexity, full of unintended consequences. Battalions of civil servants administer this Red Green apparatus, and phalanxes of lawyers and accountants try to outwit them. The immense creative effort of all of these bright people adds up to sheer waste. It produces nothing valuable and solves no human problems. It simply siphons value out of the economy. The world would be better off — and we would be wealthier — if we paid all those people to plant trees. What’s the fairest, most efficient, and least expensive way to raise money through taxes? Canada relies heavily on the income tax — but income taxes tend to penalize initiative, discourage savings and investment, and drive wealth out of the country. The obvious alternative is consumption taxes — taxes on spending, like sales taxes and import duties. The Bahamian system essentially taxes consumption. Consumption taxes are relatively cheap and simple to administer, and difficult to evade. They favour thrift over waste. They discourage you from spending, and reward you for saving and investing. But eventually you’re going to spend what you’ve earned — and that’s when the government takes its cut. Canada has both types of taxation — and others, too. Property tax, for instance, is really a tax on wealth. You pay the tax even when there’s no transaction, simply because you own your house. Imagine being rid of all this clutter. “In the Bahamas,” says a transplanted Canadian businessman, “your monthly bank statement is your accounting system. Money in the bank at the end of the month? Good. No money? Better get cracking. You really don’t need an accountant. Just look at the bank statement.” The Commonwealth of the Bahamas is a small island nation, and its policies can’t easily be transplanted to the frozen industrial north. It doesn’t provide a Canadian level of services to its people — it doesn’t have medicare, for example — and it doesn’t regulate some things which really should be regulated, like the discharge of raw sewage into its harbours. On the other hand, the Bahamas doesn’t have a huge bureaucracy, and the government presence in a Bahamian community is minimal. Canada, by contrast, creates weighty bureaucracies with tentacles reaching deep into our lives, even though their activities are often counter-productive. Case in point: the Bahamas has a small fisheries department, and plenty of fish. We have plenty of fisheries bureaucrats, in every corner of the nation — and no fish. As the elephantine Canadian tax system ramps up into feeding mode this month, I find myself wishing we could demolish the whole creaking apparatus and start afresh. We probably can’t achieve a tax regime of Bahamian simplicity, but surely we can devise a tax system that will generate the same amount of money fairly and efficiently — and a lot more simply.

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Apr 06, 2005 1:21 am
    Tax investment not income.....regulate business more strictly.

  2. Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:31 am
    Simplifying would be nice, but I think the main problem is tracking where it goes? Perhaps that is the idea behind keeping it so complicated,... we can never figure out where all our money is or isn't??

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  3. Wed Apr 06, 2005 8:23 am
    I think that IS a problem Flat Cath. I don't think we'd be able to have the same tax system as the Bahamas yet I do like the consumption tax idea. I've always felt our systems were far to complex and complicated and as loopy as any organized criminal could ask for. The more they are like that the easier it is to not know what the person at the next desk to you is inputting let alone the one in the next room or town. Honestly the more you hear about the sponsorship scandal the more your just know our MPs and the PM just do not have a clue.

    ---
    "And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche

  4. by avatar Spud
    Wed Apr 06, 2005 2:16 pm
    A complex system employs a lot of lawyers and accountants,and makes it easier to cover up what you just did.:)
    Yes the system can be simplified,but do you think the rich,the lawyers and the accountants would stand for that?Noooooooo......

  5. Wed Apr 06, 2005 4:34 pm
    As long as any money leaving the country for whatever reason is defined as consumption, I'm all for it. A dollar staying in our economy employs people, a dollar leaving our economy is a drain on our resources.

    Ken

  6. Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:03 pm
    "A lot of Canadians have been in the Bahamas this winter, sailing
    among the cays and thinking of Canada."

    While no doubt taking advantage of a people's depressed economy, paying a mere fraction of the worth of the same goods or services here in Canada, gloating over our moral superiority, while taking a much needed break from the hard work of criticizing competing fat cat, imperialist, corporate elite types who whilst away their free time in similar style. While average Joe Canadians are at home dreaming of what it might be like to vacation sailing the cays of the Bahamas. Interesting. "For Canada", still, I see.

  7. Thu Apr 07, 2005 4:30 pm
    Tax the rich and the corporations more!! Tax our oil exports more too!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  8. Fri Apr 08, 2005 12:14 am
    <p>On this side of the border, changing from production-based taxation (e.g. income taxes) to consumption-based taxation (e.g. sales taxes) is often considered to be less advantageous to people with low incomes, since the percentages of their incomes that are spent on food, shelter, &c. are greater than the corresponding percentages of wealthier people’s incomes.</p> <p>There are ways of mitigating such effects, but that could lead to the resurrection of complicated tax law…</p>

  9. Fri Apr 08, 2005 2:29 am
    The same is true north of the border however, that doesn't stop the occasional suggestions re: 'fairer' consumption taxes and 'fairer, less complex' flat taxes replacing the current income tax system.<br><br> I agree with your comment re: consumption taxes.<br><br> In terms of a less complex tax system, people forget that the complexity in current systems largely arises from government attempts to address efforts made to avoid the payment of tax. Needless to say, these efforts do not generally arise from the tax deducted at source wage earner category.<br><br> People also tend to forget that percentages tend to favour those at the top of the scale, e.g., the company is in trouble so all wage increases from top to bottom of limited to 2% because this is the fair way of doing things, forgeting that 2% for the $20 K worker is a bit different than 2% for the $200 K executive. Similarly, a 10% 'flat tax' on the $20 K earner has a somewhat different effect than the same tax on the 200 K earner<br><br> In terms of:<br> <blockquote>but income taxes tend to penalize initiative, discourage savings and investment, and drive wealth out of the country.</blockquote> There is no proof that either of the old chestnuts about income taxes penalizing initiative or discourage savings are true. For the latter part of the statement, wealth created in a nation is not driven out of the nation, it's generally snuck out the nation by those who believe their contribution consists solely of their being alive. <p>---<br>"When we are in the middle of the paradigm, it is hard to imagine any other paradigm" (Adam Smith).<br />

  10. Fri Apr 08, 2005 3:09 am
    Raising the necessary tax revenue by way of a consumption tax is an idea that appeals to me in principle as being more fair than the rip-off we have now.

    Just for the sake of argument, what would the rate have to be if sales tax were the only/main source of tax revenue, taking into account the savings from eliminating the huge income tax eating bureaucracy?

  11. Fri Apr 08, 2005 3:15 am
    The Government of Canada sites offer all the information you need to fugure this out for yourself.

    Why not do a bit of research, then share the results?

    ---
    "When we are in the middle of the paradigm, it is hard to imagine any other paradigm" (Adam Smith).

  12. Fri Apr 08, 2005 11:08 pm
    "Tax the rich and the corporations more!! Tax our oil exports more too!"

    Why not just take all their money while you're at it. What a moron. Did you get your diploma out of a Granola box or something?

    Thank God there are people like you amoung us, otherwise we'd have to go to a museum to see folks like you.

    People like you really make my life easier, you simply confirm my point of view every time you open your mouth.

    Thanks,.......tootles !

  13. Sat Apr 09, 2005 6:15 am
    You`re the real relic here, thinking that it`s OK for the rich and the corporations to hoard everything in their race to the bottom! Did daddy buy your degree?

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  14. Sun Apr 10, 2005 6:18 am
    See, you did it again, thanks.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news