Class Action Accuses Banks Of Illegal Creation Of Money

Posted on Sunday, April 24 at 19:10 by Anonymous
The complaint was filed Friday April 15, 2005 in the Supreme Court of British Columbia at New Westminster. It alleges that all financial institutions who are in the business of lending money have engaged in a deliberate scheme to defraud the borrowers by lending non-existent money which are illegally created by the financial institutions out of "thin air." The legal action brings to the fore one of the major economic "drag factors" - the interest charged by banks for money that technically and legally is not theirs to lend, because even governments end up paying interest to banks lending money for public spending, and they in turn charge tax payers. A large part of every country's tax revenue goes first and foremost - before any "internal" spending - to payment of interest, largely because of the basic flaw in our way of creating money by the rich and for the rich. Here is some more detail about the class action filed in Canada. http://www.newmediaexplorer.org/sepp/2005/04/19/canada_class_action_accuses_banks_of_illegal_creation_of_money.htm

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon Apr 25, 2005 6:58 am
    Let the Revolution begin!

    ---
    "And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche

  2. by avatar Jesse
    Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:17 am
    That's a bold suit to take up. I'm not entirely sure how well it'll do, as the banks have deep pockets...

    (read the full article, and you'll get a much better idea of what this suit is about).

    ---
    Canadians are asking, why do americans hate us? They hate our freedoms: our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to disagree with each other.

  3. by avatar Jesse
    Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:50 am
    Apparently this guy is known for somewhat baseless lawsuits, and is known as a 'vexation litigant', aka a nuisance. He's not actually a lawyer and shouldn't be representing himself as one, either. I'd be surprised if this suit proceeded much beyond initial hearings.<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.abbotsfordtimes.com/issues04/112204/news/112204nn3.html">http://www.abbotsfordtimes.com/issues04/112204/news/112204nn3.html</a><p>---<br>Canadians are asking, why do americans hate us? They hate our freedoms: our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to disagree with each other.

  4. Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:53 am
    Damn that would be very sad, because then a legitate suit will be tainted if anyone had the will to try it!

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  5. Mon Apr 25, 2005 12:04 pm
    I'm probably not right about this but the thought that I had was that you'd have to prove that taxpayers were funding this, if our levels of government, none of which have deficits anymore, then how is that true. We have DEBT payments, but that isn't new money and the amount owed is based on interest rates, which are set by the Bank of Canada-not private banks.

    This is a real issue and Canada has always been known as a bank run country, so the more press this recieves the better. It may be baseless but what we need is for the next generation of canadians to steer away from banks and for more legislation on how banks act outside the country.

  6. by avatar Spud
    Mon Apr 25, 2005 1:10 pm
    Interesting!
    The courts will of course say no because they know who pays their bills.But it is interesting.And of course true.
    Yes.Let the revolution begin!

  7. by avatar Spud
    Mon Apr 25, 2005 1:14 pm
    Well,another way of looking at it.
    The guy may be an asshole,but maybe it requires an asshole to shake the system up.The system is run by power hungry assholes.

  8. by avatar Milton
    Tue Apr 26, 2005 11:20 am
    Doesn't the establishment always call those who oppose them names and do they not plant articles which describe them in base terms and impugn their motives?

  9. Wed Jun 01, 2005 10:10 pm
    Proving that taxpayers are funding these fraudulent banking schemes is easy to do. Canadian has a monetary system which was created a couple of months are the Fed Banking Act was created in the US.

    Canada has a know national debt of nearly 2 trillion, which was mostly created by the banks. These debts were created on the assumption of the future earnings of each borrower.

    You have to educate yourself about the facts that debts/loans created by the banks must match the tax industry.

  10. Wed Jun 01, 2005 10:16 pm
    Americans do not hate the Canadians. Americans have inter-woven with the same fraudulent fractional lending system that is known as the Federal Reserve System. A private corporate, which could be much better described as a cartel.

    Demsey is a financial specialist who knows exactly what he is talking about. People that do not want to understand nor accept the truth are usually the ones who work for the banks or get's rewards by association.

    The courts have been forced by government to go along with this fraudulent banking system for almost 100 years but people are now learning more and more of this fraud. This case will be most interesting in that the judical system will be forced to either continue to remain as abettment to this banking fraud, or they will be forced to openly acknowledge the fraud as it is.

  11. Wed Jun 01, 2005 10:22 pm
    I totally agree with you. These banksters have raped the economy of the US and Canada. Went people break laws and are involved in criminal activities, they go to jail. When banks break laws and commit criminal violates, they pay some agency of the government a fine.....So What? They pay these fines with money that has been stolen from you.

    MBNA just got their 1997 bankrupcty reform bill passed in the US, which excludes credit card debt from bankruptcy. Chase and Citibank were involved in the Enron schemes and scams, continue their fraud everyday, somewhere in this world.

  12. Wed Jun 01, 2005 10:28 pm
    Sure the banks always put a label on anyone who attempts to evidence the truth about their fraud. "Debt Eliminators" "Debt avoidance schemes", etc.. Just like the US IRS labels people who ask legitimate questions "tax protestors."

    That's what their crooked attorneys are paid to do, to conceal their fraud and try to controvert anything or anyone who attempts to spread the truth about their fraud.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.



Latest Editorials

more articles »

Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news