Is Globalization On Its Way Out?

Posted on Sunday, January 21 at 09:21 by Spud
In the early 1990s, when the present era of globalization began, it was asserted that its course was irreversible. The New Economy, given birth by revolutionary changes in the sphere of information technology was immune to business cycles. There was no challenge to capitalism because the Soviet Union had collapsed and China had begun adapting itself to the new era. All the national economies were sooner or later going to be integrated into one global entity, and the world was sure to become borderless as nation-state was on its way out. This process could neither be held back nor reversed. The people opposed to this march of history were dubbed as lunatics or modern day Luddites. What is the situation after one and a half decades? No integrated global economy is visible even on the distant horizon. Bello says, “…despite runaway shops and outsourcing, what passes for an international economy remains a collection of national economies. These economies are interdependent, no doubt, but domestic factors still largely determine their dynamics. Globalization, in fact, has reached its high-water mark and is receding.” When the present era of globalization was on ascendancy, it was declared by propagandists like Thomas L. Friedman from housetops that state policies had become irrelevant and MNCs were going to be (the) domineering and driving force. Yet, the European Union, the US government and the Chinese state are stronger today than what they were a decade and a half ago. The nation-states in Latin America have become more assertive now. The MNCs have to obey their dictates even if they do not like to do so. Bello underlines: “Moreover, state policies that interfere with the market to build up industrial structures or protect employment still make a difference. Indeed, over the past 10 years, interventionist government policies have spelled the difference between development and underdevelopment, prosperity and poverty. Malaysia’s imposition of capital controls during the Asian financial crisis in 1997-98 prevented it from unraveling like Thailand or Indonesia. Strict controls also insulated China from the economic collapse engulfing its neighbours.” http://mostlywater.org/is_globalization_on_its_way_out [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 22, 2007]

Note: http://www.zmag.org/con... http://mostlywater.org/...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sun Jan 21, 2007 6:31 pm
    The European Union, the NAU (NAFTA) and Chavez with the Common Market of the Southern Cone, MERCOSUR. All designed years ago to better the trade amongst the Capitalists. Chavez and the Capitalists relized there is the "people" factor that had been ignored. Unemployment had been ignored. Reducing one's annual income while the dollar becomes inflated has sent a curveball to the biggest plans. The USA has remained protectionist and complains that China is as well. Both applied rules in relevance. Both have to. Globalization is like putting all the eggs in one basket and even the greedy are realizing that they can lose.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  2. Sun Jan 21, 2007 6:44 pm
    What nobody dares to mention is that that this so called "free movement of goods" is in reality the "free movement of capital" and for the most part restricted to insider trading systems between a few multinationals, and what's even worse, between the hundreds of names some of these multinationals operate under.

    The vast majority of so called "Canadian exports" are sales by a few to another few and to their own branches.

    The phoney GDP figures may be up, but the public gets no benefits and nobody knows what the real payments are, because much of it goes into tax havens, where the inspectors have no way of finding out.

    Apart from this, even the NAFTA countries have no reciprocity agreements for taxation purposes, so nobody knows what is really going on under the covers.

    If globalization is not dead yet, it should be shot tomorrow, as it is nothing more than a crime wave to steal, rob and kill.

    Ed Deak.

  3. Sun Jan 21, 2007 8:58 pm
    Even Martin used Canadian loopholes with his shipping company and enabled Americans and other investors to do the same. I believe the term we always use is "Leader of the Country". "Leaders of Industry" are those capable of criminal acts but using or modifying laws to enable it. Laws to pen the sheep and allow the pigs to run free. The leaders of the country are the sheep herders with little more benefits then the sheep.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news