Rose reiterated his call for action against Blair on BBC radio’s “Today” programme and in the Guardian newspaper.
Asked on “Today” whether his demand for Blair’s impeachment was merely a rhetorical flourish or whether he genuinely believed the prime minister should be “hauled” before the House of Lords on charges of “high crimes and misdemeanours,” Rose insisted that Blair should be held accountable.
“Certainly from a soldier’s perspective there can’t be any more serious decision taken by a prime minister than declaring war. And then to go to war on what turns out to be false grounds is something that no one should be allowed to walk away from.”
Rose was questioned as to whether he believed Blair’s actions in the run-up to the war were a case of getting the politics “wrong” or acting illegally. Whilst responding somewhat vaguely that they were “somewhere between the two,” the retired general’s answer emphasized the issue of illegality.
http://www.wsws.org.articles/2006/jan2006/rose-j11.shtml
Note: http://www.wsws.org.art...

What's this retired generals politics? Inquirering minds want to know.
---
"If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill
---
"If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill
---
"If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill
TRANSLATION: alright, no problem. the mother fuker is crazy in the head, man.
yo is singular; y'all is plural.
and to get back to the issue at hand, that general being a lawyer with expertise in that particular facet of english law is about as likely as the archbishop of montreal being sexually attracted to girls rather than boys. very unlikely in otherwords.
question of getting the facts straight when a Prime Minister sends
his troops into live action. Gen. Rose's credentials are given in the
article above. Me, I don't blame him for being mad as hell.
It's a bit of a shock to see people actually quibbling about this.
Sheesh. Is a general a top soldier? Yes he is. So his words mean
more than Anonymous' words. Or mine. I mean, just imagine
getting blasted and vapourized for no logical reason, and then
having Tony & George merely shrug and say "Oops!" If that.