Thank God For Canadian Aid

Posted on Monday, January 10 at 11:21 by harrisp
Coordinating what? What exactly did Canada do to provide the immediate help needed? I’m willing to be educated on this because I’m damned if I can see that we did anything short of mouth a few platitudes. Canadians, on the other hand, have been extremely generous. Even our corporations have opened their wallets; some of them have shown themselves to be very good corporate citizens. I don’t mean to belittle the efforts of corporations; that is not my intent — but their efforts will mostly be funded by taxpayers. Their charitable donations become tax deductible business expenses and the taxes they are able to avoid by these donations, perfectly legally, have to be made up somewhere — and that means you and me. Don’t misunderstand, I am not being critical of this — regardless of whether corporate largesse costs you and me money when it all comes out in the wash, these corporations have acted quickly and have loaned their very capable organizational skills to help coordinate the raising of funds and awareness. Despite my general loathing for the corporate world, I am grateful that they have willingly rushed into the breech to help. But, again, I am really annoyed with my government. Canada has for years bragged that we are always there to help when catastrophe strikes and that other nations know they can rely on us. I think, in that regard, that this may be our lowest hour. I’m sure the South Asians are grateful for all the assistance they are receiving, including ours. But I expect they’ll have a hard time describing later just what it is we did for them. An article in the January 10 edition of the Globe & Mail reports on complaints that our diplomats in South Asia have proven to be close to useless at this time of crisis. The officials defend themselves by saying they showed empathy to every Canadian, a point apparently disputed by some Canadians in the area. But they have done precious little for the South Asians. And the excuses of the government for our lackluster showing are getting to be predictable, and thoroughly annoying. We couldn’t deploy the DART quickly because, well, it’s a big effort. The fact that it was allegedly designed for rapid response does not appear to have entered the government’s consciousness. We can’t change or suspend the rules that govern financial aid so that victims in South Asia can get assistance now rather than several months from now. We can’t even manage to put any serious effort into trying to locate our own dead; we’ve left that to local governments. There have been only a few times in my life where I have questioned my allegiance to Canada. But this is one of those times when I find my nationality to be an embarrassment.

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon Jan 10, 2005 9:57 pm
    While like everyone else I feel for the victims of this tragedy and worry about problems that could still be to come like disease, and I also think that the outpouring of support from the people of the world which has in turn pressured their governments is a huge story here, I think coverage and discussion around the disaster have also become problematical in some ways. First, I want to point out the difference in the world's response to this tragedy versus ongoing tragedies like the war in the congo--where is the massive outpouring of support in the long-term tragedies still continuing around the world? Why this one tragedy and not others as well? Second, it seems to me that coverage of aid has often degenerated into kind of a horse race over who's giving what, which while probably helpful in raising aid, also seems to me to be a bit crass and degenerating into the more competetive and self-congratulatory impulses. Just something to keep in mind.

    ---
    Now call it extreme if you like, but I propose we hit it hard, and we hit it fast, with a major, and I mean major, leaflet campaign.--Rimmer, Red Dwarf

  2. Tue Jan 11, 2005 2:46 am
    I think we can leave everything to the UN. They're probably shipping in their luxury SUVs and booking all the rooms in the five-star hotels as we speak so their "assessors" and "coordinators" and other bureaucratic elites don't have to rough it.

  3. by gorian
    Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:42 am
    Hey Troll,

    Nice to see your tasteful attempt to politicize human suffering. Very dignified!

    There are no 5 star hotels left. And there are no roads on which to drive.

    Thank God for the UN -- they were the first ones handing out relief, after the local militaries. The Americans were late, and the Canadians were caught napping.

    I have to disagree with the article above though. Canada is not equipped to lead this mission. It was simply too big. Considering the resources and manpower we have at our disposal, it was much more appropriate to allow the UN to co-ordinate the effort and tell us where to go. I'm proud of Canadians for rising to the occasion, and I'm proud of Canadians for pushing our government out of its stupor. In many respects, the people and the government should always be so in synch.

    Now if only the government would put $425 million into DART, we'd have something we could work with.

    One major difference between this tragedy and others is that it was caused by nature -- therefore everyone involved was innocent. By contrast, many other tragedies are caused by political corruption, American empire building, or other human factors. With someone responsible -- and oftentimes still an active nuissance or threat -- it's easier to throw stones than build bridges to the needy. There's no justifying it, but I can understand why people rallied to this one, and not other tragedies -- even if it really isn't "fair".

    G

  4. by gina
    Tue Jan 11, 2005 6:42 am
    CBC radio had an interview yesterday with a Doctor (can't remember his name) from "Doctors Without Borders" and he made the point that this tragedy and the outpouring of generousity from Citizens and Governments around the world has just removed the excuse "There is no Money" It will be difficult to say that now and it shows that where there is political will anything can be done. We are the ones who can force political will. Start writing those letters folks and don't stop till you see some results. Mabe now we have an opportunity to change the world.

    ---
    gina

  5. Tue Jan 11, 2005 3:19 pm
    How anyone could get things so wrong except out of a malign wish to twist the facts escapes me. The UN has nothing except buildings and well paid staff. Everything it "coordinates" belongs to member countries. The ships, aircraft, helicopters, manpower and all the rest first on the scene were American, the only people who had them in the quantity and proximity to help. A week passed before the first UN bureaucrats were on the scene, flying first class from NY and Europe. Why the left insists itself to make even tragedy the occasion for political critique demonstrates again its cold inhumanity. We learned enough from your blood-letting in Russia and China, fellas. No need to keep proving it.

  6. Tue Jan 11, 2005 3:56 pm
    Good article, Paul. We aren't just under-equipped to fulfill our role in giving aid, our government is reluctant to do so. If it wasn't for the bidding war that broke out among (mostly western) wealthy nations, and the outcry from people all over the world, I wonder how much help would have been given? Not much, I'll bet.

    Hopefully this disaster will encourage change.

  7. Tue Jan 11, 2005 8:53 pm
    Thanks, Blair. I know that Canada is far too small to handle this catastrophe itself and I wouldn't expect we should have to. But I do expect that given our pride in our ability to help that we should be a little better prepared to do so.

    I also agree with Susan's comments that it is at least a little unfortunate to see the outpouring of aid in this instance when so many other tragedies don't seem to excite the world's interests. Her case in point -- Congo -- is, as you know, dear to my heart.

    But I think Anon is, as he/she/it often is, out to lunch about the UN. Of course the UN is equipped to handle these sorts of things ... it's about the only thing they do handle well.

    Regards, Blair.

    Paul

  8. Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:11 am
    But the UN doesn't do anything well. That's the point. And it's not equipped to do anything but talk.

  9. Wed Jan 12, 2005 8:00 pm
    I think we can skip the anon responses. Of course we know america has no bureaucrats, they all drive ford escorts, talk honestly and put their life on the line wherever they go. God bless them.
    Again though, I think people should look a little closer at the native situation in canada, perhaps if this outpouring of good will were extended here at home we wouldn't be chastised by the UN and amnesty int., etc for how we treat them. I honestly dont' think that if the facts were known the average canadian supports the oppression of these people, while I'll admit that the government's propaganda machine makes people think it's 'far too complicated' to deal with (better left to the bureaucrats). If the numbers of grassroots organizations, churches, and letters to the editor were actually focused on things our own country did, then I think the landscape here would be far different.

  10. Wed Jan 12, 2005 11:16 pm
    The people who are starry-eyed about the UN haven't taken a good look at its record over the past two decades or so. From winking at the genocide in Rwanda and the one underway in Dalfar to the rotten oil-for-food scandal still emerging in all its nastiness, even the last five years has been enough to turn the strongest stomach. But as the UN represents at least the theoretical possibility of bigger government, it will always have purchase on the hearts of Canadians.

  11. Thu Jan 13, 2005 5:40 am
    I think that Canada, USA, AND UK did act late but are contributing quite alot to the Tsunami Relief effort in a financial way. Thank you Canada. Thank you UK. Thank you USA. Thank you Japan. Thank you Spain. So on and so forth for your generousity and working together. We just need more wealthy countries to pitch in money. Has Saudi Arabia or Kuwait, two of the richest countries in the world, donate money yet?

    ---
    Alliance Atlantis films proudly presents...
    Anakin Skywalker will fall and the Empire will rise May 2005.

  12. by avatar Jesse
    Thu Jan 13, 2005 5:55 am
    what exactly is up with your signature? it looks suspiciously like an ad...

    ---
    Canadians are asking, why do americans hate us? They hate our freedoms: our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to disagree with each other.

  13. Thu Jan 13, 2005 5:57 am
    I'm just looking foward to Star Wars: Episode III. It will change as the movie draws closer.

    ---
    Alliance Atlantis films proudly presents...
    Anakin Skywalker will fall and the Empire will rise May 2005.

  14. by gorian
    Fri Jan 21, 2005 11:38 pm
    The easy way to tell that the Americans aren't in charge is by counting the number of bombs falling out of the sky. No bombs? No Americans.

    G



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news