Coordinating what? What exactly did Canada do to provide the immediate help needed? I’m willing to be educated on this because I’m damned if I can see that we did anything short of mouth a few platitudes.
Canadians, on the other hand, have been extremely generous. Even our corporations have opened their wallets; some of them have shown themselves to be very good corporate citizens. I don’t mean to belittle the efforts of corporations; that is not my intent — but their efforts will mostly be funded by taxpayers. Their charitable donations become tax deductible business expenses and the taxes they are able to avoid by these donations, perfectly legally, have to be made up somewhere — and that means you and me. Don’t misunderstand, I am not being critical of this — regardless of whether corporate largesse costs you and me money when it all comes out in the wash, these corporations have acted quickly and have loaned their very capable organizational skills to help coordinate the raising of funds and awareness. Despite my general loathing for the corporate world, I am grateful that they have willingly rushed into the breech to help.
But, again, I am really annoyed with my government. Canada has for years bragged that we are always there to help when catastrophe strikes and that other nations know they can rely on us. I think, in that regard, that this may be our lowest hour.
I’m sure the South Asians are grateful for all the assistance they are receiving, including ours. But I expect they’ll have a hard time describing later just what it is we did for them. An article in the January 10 edition of the Globe & Mail reports on complaints that our diplomats in South Asia have proven to be close to useless at this time of crisis. The officials defend themselves by saying they showed empathy to every Canadian, a point apparently disputed by some Canadians in the area.
But they have done precious little for the South Asians. And the excuses of the government for our lackluster showing are getting to be predictable, and thoroughly annoying. We couldn’t deploy the DART quickly because, well, it’s a big effort. The fact that it was allegedly designed for rapid response does not appear to have entered the government’s consciousness. We can’t change or suspend the rules that govern financial aid so that victims in South Asia can get assistance now rather than several months from now. We can’t even manage to put any serious effort into trying to locate our own dead; we’ve left that to local governments.
There have been only a few times in my life where I have questioned my allegiance to Canada. But this is one of those times when I find my nationality to be an embarrassment.
Comments
view comments in forum
You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.
---
Now call it extreme if you like, but I propose we hit it hard, and we hit it fast, with a major, and I mean major, leaflet campaign.--Rimmer, Red Dwarf
Nice to see your tasteful attempt to politicize human suffering. Very dignified!
There are no 5 star hotels left. And there are no roads on which to drive.
Thank God for the UN -- they were the first ones handing out relief, after the local militaries. The Americans were late, and the Canadians were caught napping.
I have to disagree with the article above though. Canada is not equipped to lead this mission. It was simply too big. Considering the resources and manpower we have at our disposal, it was much more appropriate to allow the UN to co-ordinate the effort and tell us where to go. I'm proud of Canadians for rising to the occasion, and I'm proud of Canadians for pushing our government out of its stupor. In many respects, the people and the government should always be so in synch.
Now if only the government would put $425 million into DART, we'd have something we could work with.
One major difference between this tragedy and others is that it was caused by nature -- therefore everyone involved was innocent. By contrast, many other tragedies are caused by political corruption, American empire building, or other human factors. With someone responsible -- and oftentimes still an active nuissance or threat -- it's easier to throw stones than build bridges to the needy. There's no justifying it, but I can understand why people rallied to this one, and not other tragedies -- even if it really isn't "fair".
G
---
gina
Hopefully this disaster will encourage change.
I also agree with Susan's comments that it is at least a little unfortunate to see the outpouring of aid in this instance when so many other tragedies don't seem to excite the world's interests. Her case in point -- Congo -- is, as you know, dear to my heart.
But I think Anon is, as he/she/it often is, out to lunch about the UN. Of course the UN is equipped to handle these sorts of things ... it's about the only thing they do handle well.
Regards, Blair.
Paul
Again though, I think people should look a little closer at the native situation in canada, perhaps if this outpouring of good will were extended here at home we wouldn't be chastised by the UN and amnesty int., etc for how we treat them. I honestly dont' think that if the facts were known the average canadian supports the oppression of these people, while I'll admit that the government's propaganda machine makes people think it's 'far too complicated' to deal with (better left to the bureaucrats). If the numbers of grassroots organizations, churches, and letters to the editor were actually focused on things our own country did, then I think the landscape here would be far different.
---
Alliance Atlantis films proudly presents...
Anakin Skywalker will fall and the Empire will rise May 2005.
---
Canadians are asking, why do americans hate us? They hate our freedoms: our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to disagree with each other.
---
Alliance Atlantis films proudly presents...
Anakin Skywalker will fall and the Empire will rise May 2005.
G