Mike Harris And The Rage On Toronto Streets

Posted on Tuesday, January 03 at 12:27 by BC Mary
But the most costly of the former premier's legacies might be that for which no inquiry will hold him accountable. As the old year ended and the new one began, what many see as the further bloody fallout of his Common Sense Revolution continued to play out on the streets of Toronto. And no one can say we weren't warned. As the Star's Jim Rankin reported recently, Toronto's brewing social problems were expressed with customary lucidity by Stephen Lewis in a 1992 report on racism in Ontario. ``It is black youth that is unemployed in excessive numbers, it is black students who are being inappropriately streamed in schools, it is black kids who are disproportionately dropping out, it is housing communities with large concentrations of black residents where the sense of vulnerability and disadvantage is most acute.'' Mike Harris was not buying. In his opposition days, blacks were just one of the minorities he derided. ``We're getting too many, not just black, I mean we're getting too many from other countries, too, that are coming here for a free ride,'' he said. In 1995, Harris campaigned as if middle-class property owners were his only concern. He saw little value in the work of the public sector, few votes in the notion of the public good. He came to power unleashing what no less a commentator than longtime Progressive Conservative insider Hugh Segal has called ``the tyranny of the simple idea.'' In fact, his government's first acts were to undo supports, and make circumstances more difficult, for the very communities that Lewis and others had identified as being most vulnerable. He repealed employment-equity legislation. He cut social assistance by 21 per cent. He abandoned social housing, eliminated social programs. http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1136242214642&call_pageid=968256289824&col=968342212737 [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 3, 2006]

Note: http://www.thestar.com/...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue Jan 03, 2006 9:25 pm
    This guy was a waste of skin, nice to see him get raked over the coals. Now if only people can see that his cohorts are now the CPC Ontario Thoroughbred candidates.

  2. Tue Jan 03, 2006 10:13 pm
    Harris, Klein, Eves, and Campbell are no different from the failed policies of Mulroney, Ronnie Raygun, Thatcher, Bush I and II and our own Stephen Harper. Each puts markets before people, money before community, and greed before all. While they can claim some small successes in their hack and slash orgies to benefit the already rich, most people saw their paycheques shrink, their take home pay decrease, user fees increase, taxes increase, quality of life plummet and poverty increase all around them.

    These are the failed tribulations of trickle down economics. We now have the largest gap between rich and poor we have ever had in Canada. The rich have benefited, but the vast majority have not. Almost two million Canadians live in poverty as a direct result of policies that fail to address the root cause.

    Crime has a direct link to poverty, and all the cheerleaders of the failed trickle down theory cannot refute that, but they certainly refuse to acknowledge it as they push for more.

    ---
    If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.

  3. Wed Jan 04, 2006 12:17 am
    Good grief, provinces are BROKE because of the FEDS people. You want to see markets before people just look at the LIBERAL party.

  4. Wed Jan 04, 2006 3:43 am
    Certainly the federal government adopted neo-liberal/conservative economic theory which promotes trickledown economics. Some provincial premiers and Harris is one of them, adopted the same theory. The theory is that as the rich become richer everyone else benefits. When the other 80 per cent do not benefit they blame individuals rather than policies.

    The policies the Conservatives are advocating are designed to enrich the wealthy even more and create even larger inequalities. That is because they have rejected progressive ideas, which are designed to assist access to the opportunities that the top 20 per cent want to limit to their own class. They believe that by dismantling much of the federal government this top 20 per cent will gain far more control over society.

    The theory is basically anti-democratic because it postulates that power should be determined by control over the marketplace not by politics. We can gripe and complain about government but at least we can theoretically fire politicians at the next election. We cannot fire the corporate magnates that control our lives.

  5. Wed Jan 04, 2006 8:27 am
    How about political inequality brought to you by the Liberal Party of Canada? According to them you are only a proud Canadian if you vote Liberal. Remember Paul Martin's values are Canadian and everyone else is an outsider. This is on top of the near dictatorial government they run. If you want to talk anti-democratic, are you kidding me with the Liberals?

    Only Liberals scare others into voting for them. As if they were any better! If for some reason you're afraid of the Conservatives, that's fine. Vote NDP for God's sake!!!

  6. by michou
    Wed Jan 04, 2006 1:02 pm
    In the ‘90’s, while Mike Harris was cutting back on social programs in Ontario, Québec was doing just the opposite by funding a universal child care system and adding to its education system for the specifics of better integrating its immigrant population. Today, Montreal’s crime rate is declining while Toronto’s is increasing. Tougher gun laws, waging war on crime will not resolve the core problem. Immigrants are not the problem, it is how Canadians succeed at integrating them into their new society which is at cause here. The Canadian multiculturalism policy is in need of some human guidance. As one famous Québécois composer once sang decades ago:<p> <i>« From my grand solitary home, I will shout never be quiet, to all men of the earth, my home is our home. Within my four walls of ice, I have taken the time and space, tending the fire and the place, for humans on the horizon, and all humans are of my race. »</i><p> It seems his words have found an echo in the population of Québec and they have made a difference on how immigrants are treated, welcoming them to integrate and fully participate within their new society. Nothing is perfect but Canadians could learn something from Québécers on this one. <p>---<br>« Il y a une belle, une terrible rationalité dans la décision d'être libre. » - Gérard Bergeron <br />

  7. Wed Jan 04, 2006 4:54 pm
    Spoken like a true Quebecois there, mich. There is no more xenophobic society than Quebec. It's the minorities fault, because they don't know how to eat their poutine properly or slice the tourtiere. Gimme a break. Allowing people to feel included by sharing their culture and being who they are normally, rather than feeling alienated or left out, or FORCED to conform to another society eliminates hostility, it doesn't create it. I find it ironic that quebec hasn't learned from the wrongs done unto them.

  8. Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:00 pm
    Provinces are not broke because of the liberal party - nice CPC talking point there, care to share any independent thoughts not written by Stephen Harper or Tom Flanagan?
    You should check your history books, this "Fiscal Imbalance" and "more provincial power" blah blah blah has existed since confederation - go ahead, check it out, we've been dancing around these issues for over 100 years through both Liberal AND CONSERVATIVE governments.
    The topic of this thread has nothing do do with the financial status of Ontario, it has to do with Mike Harris, his racist attitudes, and indifference to poverty or even issues that don't involve his buddies in the gated communities. If the water was bad in the clubhouse on his golf course, or if someone was trying to build a warehouse next to his 4-Level estate home I'm sure he would have been much more motivated to care. Fact remains, the guy couldn't give a shit about anyone else but himself and his rich buddies. But then, that's how consevatives work - give them easy talking points to continue to spit out like a mantra and soon they will believe it, even though the policies are most likely to their detriment. You know what they say, ignorance is bliss.

  9. Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:11 pm
    michou, I really felt comfortable with what you told us. Good for
    you. Good for Quebec!

    You're right, there's a lot to be learned from the way La Belle
    Provence has done things, starting with Day Care facilities.

  10. Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:17 pm
    <blockquote> Crime has a direct link to poverty </blockquote> Yes. Why can't poor people quit fidgeting so....? There's always been poor people. You'd think they be used to it by now. But no! They want to rise above their station; put on airs; have aspirations, hopes, desires. Tsk! BTW: I've heard it mentioned that Toronto's rash of shootings is because the shooters are black, not because they're poor or disenfranchised...........

  11. by RPW
    Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:19 pm
    Not "anonymous"...........

    ---
    RickW

  12. Wed Jan 04, 2006 5:31 pm
    Is that you again, Miss USA? What? Only the rich people can "rise above their station; put on airs; have aspirations, hopes, desires"? In USA maybe but not here. We must all be given equal chances to aspire.

  13. by michou
    Wed Jan 04, 2006 6:29 pm
    <i>"There is no more xenophobic society than Quebec"</i><p>This comment explains why Québec holds one of the highest number of interracial marriages in North America. We Québécers are so xenophobic and racist that we'd rather marry and have babies outside our 'ethnic' race than let those newcomers live in peace without having them mingle with our francophone lot. It also explains why more than 30 % of 2nd generation born immigrants now support Québec sovereignty and feel like they are part of Québec first, before having any such feelings towards Canada. <p> Anon, you either don't get around much or you are too blind to take off your biased sunglasses where Québec is concerned. <p> If Canadians don't want to see a repeat of the same that occurred in Paris suburbs not very long ago, it is time to rethink how new immigrants are integrated into Canadian society. <p>---<br>« Il y a une belle, une terrible rationalité dans la décision d'être libre. » - Gérard Bergeron <br />

  14. Wed Jan 04, 2006 7:02 pm
    Well then, why are separatists so terrified of english Canada? I mean, yeah, much of what you say, Michou, is true. I see what you say because I`ve been to Quebec. Montreal actually reminded me of what Toronto used to be! And I think what we`re saying here, is, yeah, Bravo, Quebec! But remember, english Canada happens to be Quebec`s best friend, whether you admit it or not. And I also agree with those above who say that we cannot forget the Chretien-Martin-Gordon Campbell- Jean Charest liberals when it comes to putting profits before people! But I can`t resist to say again, what would Quebec`s status be without help from the rest of Canada? Think ice storm and Saguenay floods, just to name some examples.

    ---
    Dave Ruston



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news