Harper's Dark Opportunity

Posted on Saturday, April 23 at 18:01 by Diogenes
Mr. Harper is not a man who readily changes his views and it has long been his conviction that he has a duty to reshape Canada regardless of what its citizens want. When he joined the Reform Party in the late 1980s he demonstrated his scorn for the so-called "grass roots" of the party, telling a reporter that policies coming from the "bottom-up" were "simple and low quality." And the main source of his admiration for Preston Manning was the leader's uncanny ability to get Reform members to abandon some of their passionately-held beliefs: "It's amazing what you can persuade them (party members) to do once you convince them it's the leader who is telling them." Proud of shredded programs Virtually all of the policies of the Reform Party were written by Preston Manning and Stephen Harper. They included the elimination of the Canada Health Act, draconian immigration policies, massive decentralization to eliminate universality in social programs, and huge cuts to federal funding for such programs. While they were never the government, the party provided both pressure and support for Paul Martin's radical restructuring of the country's finances and social legislation. Harper was well aware of the party's role in taking the country backwards. In a speech to the National Citizens Coalition while still MP for Calgary West, Harper assessed Reform's influence, boasting "the Liberal government in Ottawa has announced... no new major social spending programs. Universality has been severely reduced: It is virtually dead as a concept in most areas of public policy. The family allowance program has been eliminated and unemployment insurance has been seriously cut back." Harper left the Reform Party in 1997 over strategic differences with Manning. It is very revealing of the man's politics that he took the position of president of the National Citizens' Coalition (NCC) - the most ferociously right-wing lobby group in the country. Founded originally to fight public medicare, the NCC was Reform's soul-mate. Harper praised the organization because it "criticizes, attacks and gives alternatives to such things as official multiculturalism, enforced national bilingualism, a pro-criminal justice system, anti-family social policies, open door immigration..." Opposed election finance reforms It is ironic, given Harper's outrage over a political scandal involving corporate money, that he spent much of his time at the NCC in a successful court challenge of federal election finance reform. The reform (now in place) would have prevented corporations from contributing to political parties. While no law can guarantee corruption will end, the law Harper fought so hard against - he dismissed it as a "gag law" - would arguably have reduced the opportunities and changed the political culture. But it was an article in the National Post a few days after the 2000 election that exposed the real Stephen Harper. In the article, Harper revealed his admiration for free-enterprise Alberta and his contempt for the rest of Canada: "Canada appears content to become a second-tier socialistic country, boasting ever more loudly about its ...social services to mask its second-rate status." There is nothing on the public record to suggest Stephen Harper has changed his radical views. He just has been much more careful about expressing them. The Conservative leader is a man totally enamored with the US - who supported the Iraq war and ballistic missile defence (despite his coyness), admires George Bush, detests social programs and the equality principle which drives them, and is a proud believer in America's culture of possessive individualism. As such he is more at odds with Canadians' values than any national party leader in sixty years. Handing over the reigns of government to a man who has contempt for his own country would be a catastrophic mistake. Scandal or no scandal, Canadians need to keep their eye on the prize: the future of their country. Murray Dobbin's 'State of the Nation' column appears twice monthly on The Tyee. http://www.thetyee.ca/Views/2005/04/21/HarpersDarkOpportunity/

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by N Say
    Sun Apr 24, 2005 2:07 am
    right on the money! I've been telling people all along that if I has only 2 choices I'd pick the corrupt lazy Liberals over the power-hungry Conservatives any day.

    ---
    "George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va

  2. Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:48 am
    what load of bullshit.

  3. Sun Apr 24, 2005 6:00 am
    So Harper is against people dying in line-ups waiting for health care, what's wrong with that?

    Harper has a vision to change federal policy toward economic 'have-not' regions so they aren't perpetually dependent, what's wrong with that? welfare is a soul-sucking way of controlling people, very sad for the psyche actually.

    Harper also wants to toss corrupt politicians who have stolen our money out of office(and hopefully into prison), what's wrong with that? The Liberals are very clearly criminal and the message to the rest of the country from the Liberal party is "steal what you can" - great message.

    Canada has a big wasteful government that is no longer responsible or responsive to the Canadian people - it is astounding that Canadians care so little about this country that some people would be willing to vote for these criminals again.

  4. Sun Apr 24, 2005 6:48 am
    I love this comment: 'Harper also wants to toss corrupt politicians who have stolen our money out of office(and hopefully into prison), what's wrong with that? The Liberals are very clearly criminal and the message to the rest of the country from the Liberal party is "steal what you can" - great message.'

    Does that apply to Liberals only or does he feel the same way about any corrupt politician? Read 'On The Take' by Stevie Cameron

    Also that getting rid of welfare idea, is super, would he raise the minimum wage, and create jobs that people can actually work at one instead of two or three to pay the bills? Will he end corporate welfare which is the most critical kind of welfare in this country? Perhaps if we were not providing so much corporate welfare, the people of this country could actually make a decent living and support themselves? Perhaps if the money hungry banks were not charging outrageous interest on mortgages and credit cards the people could afford to support their families. If students could afford their secondary education, maybe they wouldn't be using credit cards to buy basic needs and their parents wouldn't have give up their retirement savings to help them? I think it is very difficult for those who are affluent and think that money grows at dinner parties, and can be gained quickly by making a side deal, or jobs are gained by who you know, or can afford a $400.00 meal to listen to their leader speak, to really understand the meaning of 'making a living' and I don't believe that SHarper has the compassion, leadership skills or desire to lead Canada and her people to anything but a colony of the U.S. empire!

    Waiting lines in hospitals were never a problem, until somebody saw a buck to be made by privatizing them; now we have waiting lines in order to create a mess that can only be fixed with private money. We had a great healthcare system in this country since Tommy Douglas started universal healthcare, so great that the corporate greed couldn't stand it! You think they want to serve Canadians, to aid us in better healthcare...ha ha ha ha Those who have the money like the Harpers of the world, will have healthcare and they will look at us and say, 'what is your problem?'

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  5. by N Say
    Sun Apr 24, 2005 2:52 pm
    why? sure the Liberals are corrupt scum, but at least they're lazy. Even if the Conservatives weren't corrupt scum either, I would never under any circumstances support a party that would actively (try to) dismantle all our national institutions, including the national government itself. It's simply a matter of public record that the Conservatives would do the following:
    - get rid of the CWB
    - get rid of the CRTC
    - privatise the CBC (hey they should sell it to FOX!)
    - get us a private for-profit health system
    - get us into a common market or customs union with the US (true the Liberals want that also but as I said, they're too lazy to really do it)
    so yeah if I jad a choice I would want a party that wouldn't do that stuff rather than one that would. even if both parties weren't equally corrupt i'd still want that situation.

    ---
    "George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va

  6. Sun Apr 24, 2005 11:21 pm
    Harper has silicone breast implants that make him just another nanny for the corporate suckers to feast off our taxes. So many sucking off so little!

    ---
    "And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music." Friedrich Nietzsche

  7. by michou
    Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:22 am
    <p>ROTFLMAO !!! <p>---<br>« Il y a une belle, une terrible rationalité dans la décision d'être libre. » - Gérard Bergeron <br />

  8. Tue Apr 26, 2005 2:33 pm
    Let's recall some of the sentiments that have leaked out of the Western right about the maritimes. "Eastern bumbs", and "a hand up not a handout" the latter which is spin for you get nothing, take a hike, but yes you can scrub my toilet for a meagerly tightfisted minimum wage, cause I'm esentially better than you, and therefore more entitled. I have yet to hear a representative of the right that this crap hasn't leaked out of sooner or later. Just because Harper has shined up his fresh scrubbed son a revival tent minister's face doesn't mean everyone is signing up for a chance at the toilet. What will Harper do with offshore oil deals signed for Maritime provinces if he becomes prime minister? All that talk of wanting the have nots to be independent won't last a week.

  9. Sun May 01, 2005 4:08 pm
    Flanagan ... Tom Flanagan ... "The Man Behind Stephen Harper" ...
    check him out before you do a thing.

    It absolutely knocked me flat, to realize that any Canadian leader
    would incorporate the Karl Rove/Donald Rumsfeld/George W.
    Bush philosophy right into his life ... and possibly into our lives.
    Flanagan does that. Flanagan is #1 guy on the Harper team.

    Tom Flanagan is Harper's campaign manager ... already hard at
    work trying to win Canadian hearts and minds.

    Oh. You hadn't heard of him? Believe me, that's exactly the way
    they planned it.

    ---
    Mary

  10. Tue May 03, 2005 6:26 am
    I wish the thoughtful opposition to open-door immigration wasn't ruined by extremism and rudeness on other issues.

  11. Thu Jun 02, 2005 10:40 pm
    I would go so far as to say that the Conservative agenda in its present incarnation is tantamount to treason, and anybody who votes Conservative, and therefore allies themselves with the neo-conservatives, essentially would be a traitor themselves.

    We all (especially Tom Flanagan) know what was done with traitors over a century ago (i.e. just think of Louis Reil.) The "Calgary School" is essentially undermining Canadian sovereignty by continually exaggerating the worst, and decrying that Canada is a second rate country. Perhaps when we all realize the treasonous acts that are being committed today - we can send all these assholes down to Texas where they can be dealt with appropriately.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news