Canadian Bullets, Dead Iraqis

Posted on Friday, September 10 at 08:37 by michou
    Canadian Bullets, Dead Iraqis

With up to 13,802 Iraqi civilian deaths to date, Canadians will now be providing one of the most basic necessities for the US occupation forces in Iraq: bullets. The Canadian company SNC Technologies Inc. (SNC TEC) is now part of a multinational consortium of small-caliber ammunition producers whose purpose is to supply between 300 million -500 million more bullets to occupation forces per year, and potentially for at least five years.

Beyond Canada, General Dynamics, the US defence contractor, also awarded contracts to several small bullet suppliers - including Winchester, a unit of Olin Corporation and Israel Military Industries. Their also in discussion with several other international producers, including General Dynamics Santa Barbara Sistemas, Madrid, Spain in an effort to try to meet the ammunitions demand. Michael S. Wilson, president of General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems, said,“Our goal is to ensure maximum supply support for the U.S. armed forces in their war against terror.”

The high demand in bullets is in response to a recent U.S. Army market survey for a “Small-Caliber Ammunition Systems Integrator”. The Financial Times reports that the US occupation forces “will need 300m to 500m more bullets a year for at least five years, or more than 1.5m a year for combat and training. And because the single army-owned, small-calibre ammunition factory in Lake City, Missouri, can produce only 1.2m bullets annually, the army is suddenly scrambling to get private defence contractors to help fill the gap.”

“We’re using so much ammunition in Iraq there isn’t enough capacity around,” said Eric Hugel, a defence industry analyst at Sephens Inc. “They have to go internationally.”

The Financial Times also reports that the “bullet problem has its roots in a Pentagon effort to restock its depleted war material reserve. But it has been exacerbated by the ongoing operations in Afghanistan and Iraq, where rearguard and supply units have been thinly-stretched throughout the countryside, occasionally without active duty combat soldiers to protect them.”

Recently rejuvenated after the historic demonstrations in New York, where half a million people were unified in saying “No to the Bush agenda”, a campaign focusing on these contracts could have a direct effect on saving the lives of Iraqis, and give traction to an again waking anti-war movement. For the international anti-war movement, which is struggling to live up to it’s reputation as “the other super power”, such contracts could provide important anti-war campaigns in our own nations, raising the social costs for the US, and other complicit countries, in waging war on Iraq. For Canada, long in denial about it’s active participation in the US war on terror, the SNC Technologies contract should highlight the fact that Canada has not only provided previous military and diplomatic support for the war on terror, but is now literally, without doubt, providing the ammunition to kill Iraqis.

As for the general structure of the contracts, General Dynamics reports that they will serve as the systems integrator responsible for supply chain management, with Winchester serving as a principal supplier of all calibers of ammunition, including 5.56mm, 7.62mm and Cal. 50 ammunitions. Israel Military Industries Ltd. currently produces ammunition to U.S. military specifications for each of the calibers being sought and will be relied upon to be a significant production partner on the team. SNC will also be a critical provider of select ammunition across all calibers being sought.

[Editor's note: Do you have a link to this story?

I assume it's this one. We need it for fair use purposes . . .Thanks, Dr. C]



Note: this

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Fri Sep 10, 2004 7:23 pm
    You can take "Canadian" out from in front of calling SNC TEC a "Canadian company." Most people realize now a company owes alligence to no one but itself. It doesn't matter what country its in, especially with Globalization running wild now as it has been for quite some time. If the intention of this article was to lay some sort of guilt trip on the Canadian people as to what a "Canadian" company is doing in their name... I can't agree with that. We have zero say in what goes on. It's just another addition to the list of corportate capitalist endevors that invests zero consideration in morals, ethics, or a belief system at all really, other than a head first dive into making money at any cost without any or very little democratic control. Anyone who tacks a country in front of a company's name is doing that country a dis-service. If you're a free market country... this is what happens. Don't associate regular folk with it. It's the system (capitalism) policy makers chose to put in place years ago, and this is the consequence. Unescapable unless we change the system (to what I have no idea).

    Anyone who looks at something like this and says.. "look at what that damn Canadian company is doing. This is outrageous. I can't believe the gall of the Canadian people," is dangerously misleading themselves. It's this kind of thinking and attitude that must be dispelled in the general public ASAP... which of course the mainstream middle has little interest in doing it seems.

    ---
    Revolution.

  2. Fri Sep 10, 2004 8:06 pm
    I wholly agree. It's like blaming Candians for people killed by US tanks, when the control systems for those tanks may be made here. I'll bet the fuel in those tanks comes from Saudi Arabia too - I don't see any finger shaking at the Saudis for Iraqi Deaths.<p> Guns don't kill people . . . bullets don't kill people . . .<p> <p>---<br>"If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill <br />

  3. Fri Sep 10, 2004 8:56 pm
    I quite disagree with your responses to Michou's submitted story. To me whoever caters to the "value chain" of the hate market needs to take responsability: from the Chief-Commander, to the grunt infantry troop, to the jet-fighter pilot, to the manufacturers of weapons, to the weapon brokers, and ultimately to the People voting their leaders in. Canada could certainly take regulatory measure in controlling arm related exports. If that amounts to killing this industry, I would argue that this is a much lesser evil. Bowling for Columbine made that case quite well.

    Whether the bullet was a an American one, a Canadian, a Québécois, or a British-Columbian makes no difference whatsoever. People have to take some responsability somewhere. Assessing Canadian sovereinty means to me that certain things should not go out (or in) our geographical border. Michou brought up a good one IMHO. I am not sure however if a sovereign Quebec could do any better as they have their own hate market stakeholders and just as many people asleep over this. Common-ground?

  4. Fri Sep 10, 2004 9:47 pm
    Absolutely, Michou has brought up an intersting topic for discussion.<p> But, it's just a bullet. It does not hate. It does not choose to kill. It simply is.<p> NATO standard 7.62 and 5.56 rounds are very common (S&W .50 calibre are a different story alltogether). They are used not only in the military, but law enforcement as well. To me, it makes no difference who makes the bullet; whether it's used in combat, target practice, or to terminate a disturbed man holding an innocent hostage on the streets of Toronto.<p> It may one day be used in the defence of my country. It's just a bullet.<p> <p>---<br>"If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill <br />

  5. Fri Sep 10, 2004 11:27 pm
    And guns/weapons to use these bullets are manufactured by who?

  6. Sat Sep 11, 2004 1:06 am
    The AK-47 is manufacutred in approximately 34 different countries, it would take quite awhile to find out who all the stakeholders are. Canada is barely a bit player in the arms trade, if we stopped manufacturing tomorrow the world wouldn't notice and could care less anyway.

  7. by RPW
    Sat Sep 11, 2004 4:03 am

  8. by RPW
    Sat Sep 11, 2004 4:06 am
    Then perhaps we should.......? <p>But then, manufacturing bullets is "good business".</p> Growing pot is a heinous crime..........<p>---<br>RickW

  9. Sat Sep 11, 2004 4:34 am
    Ok sure.

    So one can and has argued that Capitalism, while propelling humanity to new technological heights, is leading us down the road to ruin right quick. So, what to do if you're an average nobody and believe this to be true? Do you stop working? Then you become homeless and eventually starve to death without handouts. Do you stop paying taxes? Your credit would be ruined and you wouldn't be able to buy anything expensive.. like a car or house, and eventually you'd be thrown in jail.

    Oh, but it's that person's own fault. Maybe if they had "voted" differently they wouldn't have to deal with these problems. Pffh. It's rediculous to assume this. Everything (capitalism, free markets, modern economic structure) has been set in place years ago, and has just been gaining momentum since (slight policy changes, revisions here and there, yadda yadda occur). Blaming some idiot labourer who's making bullets because it pays more than MacDonald's is ludacris. One person taking a stand means nothing. They'd be viewed by most as self-righteous, others maybe would admire them.. but wouldn't follow. EVERYONE would have to get up together and say "NO!" to mean anything, and that's not going to happen without big time policy or massive cultural change. So please, don't blame the sheep on the floor just because the wolves are out of sight up in the office upstairs.

    ---
    Revolution.

  10. by avatar Milton
    Sat Sep 11, 2004 4:35 pm
    A journey of a thousand miles begins with one small step. If you don't take that step you don't get there. Nothing <b>is</b> accomplished if nothing is done. The way it is is the way it will be if we don't change it. Stop working for bullet manufacturers and napalm manufacturers and , in general, illth manufacturers.

  11. by michou
    Sat Sep 11, 2004 7:38 pm
    I like your take (toke ?) RPW. If growing pot is illegal why should making bullets be allowed ? I know I know, we are talking big business here. Well so could pot growing. <p> How about more of that Canadian Ganja Gold ? I bet ya real big business $$ from this "growth" industry. Ganja is a renewable resource, ecological to boot, easy to grow and does not kill anyone.</p><p>"Hey America, I ain't got bullets but I got some real good weed for you. Stop the war and chill out !"

  12. Sat Sep 11, 2004 11:53 pm
    Whaddya goin' to do, giggle them to death ??



    ---
    "One crisis at a time is life's motto" - Carl Sagan
    Jim Callaghan
    Minden, Ontario
    705-286-1860
    www.misterc.ca

  13. by RPW
    Sun Sep 12, 2004 4:12 pm
    Are you talking about people actually giving some thought to what they do as it affects society and the world? Come, come now! That would mean no more sweatshops, no more agribusiness, no more malls, no more immaculate front lawns, no more automobiles, no more of practically ANYTHING that we have come to believe is "normal", as people begin to realise just what it means when 80% of the resources of the world are consumed by 20% of the people.

    ---
    RickW

  14. Sun Sep 12, 2004 9:11 pm
    The AK-47 takes 7.62mmX39mm cartridges. Not the same as a standard NATO 7.62 round. But there are conversion kits. Nice FUD.


    ---
    "If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news