What Harper Stands For

Posted on Sunday, April 25 at 11:37 by N Say
Newly minted Reform MP Harper thanked the NCC for "a great victory for freedom in Canada" in Parliament, while then NCC president David Somerville boasted that Reform "cribbed probably two-thirds of our policy book."

To know what policies prime minister Harper would promote, Canadians need to examine the roots and beliefs of this organization.

The NCC was founded in 1967 by an insurance salesman who hated medicare. In a 1984 newsletter to its members, the NCC claimed Canadians would "die" as a result of the new Canada Health Act.

In the intervening years, the NCC ? its advisory board is a who's who of the corporate world ? has been a highly funded opponent of unions, official bilingualism and multiculturalism, social programs, public schools, the post office, equity programs for women and minorities, the wheat board and government grants to the arts.

An article in the May, 1995, NCC newsletter claimed that democracy is an Anglo-Saxon institution. Somerville wrote in the March, 1996, NCC newsletter that Canada should abandon attempts to keep Quebec in Confederation.

"If you want red meat for breakfast then you want to get involved in something like the National Citizens Coalition," he once said. Harper's current "red meat" views are alarming.

While slamming Atlantic Canada as a "can't do" culture, and calling Canada a "second-tier socialistic country" in a newspaper column, he signed the famous "Firewall Manifesto" after the 2000 election, calling on Alberta to withdraw from the Canada Pension Plan and medicare, collect its own income tax, and kick out the RCMP.

He supports private health-care delivery (a "natural development" he said in the House of Commons on Oct. 28, 2000) and the provincial governments that want to opt out of medicare.

His cavalier attitude toward a united Canada was laid out in a 1994 NNC speech: "Whether Canada ends up with one national government or two governments or 10 governments, the Canadian people will require less government no matter what the constitutional status or arrangement of any future country may be."

On foreign policy, Harper is stridently pro-American, a hawk on defence and security and dismissive of the U.N.

He supports U.S. President George Bush's war in Iraq, calling the Canadian position "abrasively neutral."

He critiques Canada's historic foreign policy position of multilateralism as a "weak nation strategy" and says that Canada should join the Bush administration's missile defence program.

He calls for "continental economic and security integration" with the U.S. as well as a "continental energy strategy" that should be broadened "to a range of other natural resources."

Is he referring to Canada's water?

And he openly supports U.S. military might over the "soft power" of diplomacy.

In a May, 2003, speech to the Institute for Research on Public Policy, Harper said: "The time has come to recognize that the U.S. will continue to exercise unprecedented power in a world where international rules are still unreliable and where security and advancing of the free democratic order still depend significantly on the possession and use of military might."

more here.

WOW is the new American Party more like the "Bloc Alberta" Party or what!!

Note: here

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sun Apr 25, 2004 10:37 pm
    Now if only the globe and mail readers can read articles like this. It would help these readers brake away from the mental block of Harper the next prime minister. The globe needs more articles with Maude Barlow, Mel Hurtig, James Laxer, Paul Hellyer and David Orchard.

    Kevin

  2. Sun Apr 25, 2004 11:13 pm
    Well of course, the international corporate/neo-conservative movement (as a corollary to the international socialist movement) doesn't care about nation-building or the well-being of the impoverished majority. No no. profits and greed unite these elites. This elite international coaltion (to which Harper obviously proudly belongs) are seeking to, and are largely succeeding in, undoing years of progress and reforms that liberals and progressive minded governments have intiated. If Harper is elected by a largely ignorant and indifferent Canadian public (let's not beat around the bush anymore, shall we? How many Canadians besides the few who shares the views expressed on vivelecanada.ca really give a damn or interest about the corportatisation of Canada) then the dismantling (of what is left) of the Canadian social welfare state will take on its most aggresive phase. We can also look forward to the conclusion of the visionary bilingual and multicultural policies of Trudeau. Ugh, the whole situation just makes me sick.

  3. by avatar arc628
    Mon Apr 26, 2004 2:05 am
    What Harper stands for is sickening. He hates our country and is chomping at the bit to sell it out to the highest bidder. I'm not too worried though, once the whole country finds out exactly what he stands for they will promptly reject him.

    ---
    Canadian pride may not rest on our sleeves, but it resides deeply in our hearts.

  4. Mon Apr 26, 2004 2:29 am
    What I see in this discussion is a lot of self-righteous, unthinking rhetoric. Have any of you actually taken any time to think for yourselves rather than parrot this extremist language? If you really want to create a better Canadian life, complete with unique and thoughtful solutions, I think you could do better than spout what amounts to unconcealed hatred and character asassination. I know of no one, with the possible exception of the most brutish dictators abroad, who would fit the malevolent descriptions you ascribe to Mr. Harper, a man who has put himself into what is probably the most thankless jobs we have in this country, that of political leadership.

    The extremist positioning and language used in this discussion and elsewhere does not help the cause.

    Grow up.

  5. Mon Apr 26, 2004 2:34 am
    Should we apologize that Anon took our freedom of speech personal. I no I won't apologize. I didn't do any name calling. I can think of a few for Mr. Harper though ;)

    Kevin

  6. Mon Apr 26, 2004 2:38 am
    Well said!

  7. by avatar arc628
    Mon Apr 26, 2004 2:42 am
    It is *Because* we think for ourselves that we use this so called 'extremist' language. Take some time to think about what it means to be Canadian, what we value as a nation. Then take a look at where Mr. Harper stands on those issues and name just one that matches up.

    Healthcare? Nope
    Military? Nope
    Privitization? Nope

    Do I need to continue? Stephen Harper is a danger to everything I love about my country.

    Of course I'm probably worried about nothing. He'll never get elected, the man has all the charisma and leadership of an empty can of pop.

    ---
    Canadian pride may not rest on our sleeves, but it resides deeply in our hearts.

  8. Mon Apr 26, 2004 2:42 am
    I agree. Well said Anon. However I'm not sure that I agree totally with YOUR personal perception of what people are saying here. When people are frustrated, what else can you expect.

    I say to people here SPEAK OUT and speak as much as you want, in any way you want. Even you anon.

    Kevin

  9. Mon Apr 26, 2004 2:44 am
    Well said arc.

  10. Mon Apr 26, 2004 2:55 am
    Bah, you totally misunderstand about what we are complaining. No one is suggesting Harper will turn Canada into a North American Belarus. What we are concerned about is the extent to which Harper and other far right wing ideologues/social conservertives want to re-invent Canada. Harper shares many of the policy stances of US republicans. This isn't based on heresay, nor does it originate from our fanciful imaginations: his alarming statements are on the public record (his loathing of official bilingualism, his distaste of public health care, his support of further economic and political integration into the US). You haven't offered any refutation of the oringal comments made in the posted article. All you did was resort to an ad hominem attack. Typically right wing and regrettably for you, reveals your ignorance and lack of understanding of the issues.

  11. Mon Apr 26, 2004 2:56 am
    One of the most narrow-minded bigmouths in the country is Maude Barlow, it's hardly surprising that she will try and skewer Stephen Harper. Anyone not in tune with Maude's stringent ideology will be viciously attacked and especially anyone who actually has demonstrated that he is comitted to some basic principles of decency, such as Stephen Harper. Maude Barlow's radicalism would bankrupt Canada both financially and morally if she had half a chance.

  12. Mon Apr 26, 2004 3:00 am
    I didn't realize Maude Barlow was running to be Prime Minister :-p

    Kevin

  13. Mon Apr 26, 2004 3:05 am
    Stringent ideology? And I suppose you think Harper is a moderate? Harper and the rest of his croonies from Alberta are quite possibly the most ideologically driven politicians in the history of Canada. What they propose to do to Canada is nothing short of revolutonary. Barlow and like minded others are trying to SAVE the vision of Canada that great leaders like MacDonald, Laurier, King, Pearson and Trudeau have spent over 130 years building. All that progress is now in danger of being erased by US Republican party lackies of the Conservative Party 'of Canada'.

  14. Mon Apr 26, 2004 3:14 am
    Maude Barlow is actually working in one of those thankless jobs, as for Stephen Harper he aspires for one of the most pretigious jobs in Canada; and that position historically has not only said 'thank you' in a big way, via paycheque, pension, connections to other corporate interests; etc.etc. So to say that he is such a great person because he is willing to publicly pursue such a 'thankless' job couldn't be further from the truth! It is the people en masse who risk far more to speak out, to stand for Canada and risk being criticized for it, the people who speak out against injustices, poverty, and for our healthcare system, for our country's sovereignty etc. that are really doing the thankless job for very little if any compesation, and in fact for many it costs them.

    Sorry I just don't see Mr. Harper as a victim here, if he or anyone else wants to be in politics it better be to serve, thankless or not; the people of THIS country, defend THIS Nation and all of our rights, our natural resources, our environment, our social programs! If not don't bother us with the rhetoric, form a corporation and take your risks, but don't use us or our money to promote a personal agenda.

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news