The BSE Crisis And The Moral Authority To Govern

Posted on Monday, May 16 at 11:39 by sthompson
Rural Champions... not A careless Liberal government handed over hundreds of millions to huge feedlots and major packers giving the median farmer a whopping $1,100, on the advice and with the collusion of Mr. Klein’s Conservatives. Hardly compensation for a cumulative average loss of $40,200. A rurally unconscious Liberal government continues to feed cash to the likes of GM and Bombardier at more than $60,000 per job "created." This same Liberal government offers nothing more than lip service to producer efforts to wrest control of the beef industry from trans-nationals and our own monopolistic few. Spinning themselves as defenders of public health care, Liberal governments allowed fee-based, private diagnostic and other clinics to creep in and serve the moneyed few jumping the queue. Liberal governments have demonstrated only weakness in dealing with the embarrassing antics of the elf from Edmonton. Liberal governments have handed more and more of the decision-making power of the federal government to the civil service with the result that much of the funding for new programs goes to administration. Rather than concentrate on program effectiveness, the Liberals have given bureaucrats their head and focus on program replacement. After all, politicians like making announcements; and bureaucrats like designing forms and building paper obstacles. The Liberals have had more than enough time to study, understand and encourage rural Canada. That they have not is more choice than oversight. Prioritize The farming community holds the last grasp on common sense in this country. Use it. Don't let politicians define the issues. When the farm is bankrupt it doesn't matter whether or not the "couple" that ran it fit a traditional definition of marriage. Family farms are losing ground rapidly and literally and now rural Canada is asked to make a moral choice between cow crap and pig poop. Insanity is often defined as repeating past actions expecting a different outcome. It’s time we took a different road. Don Thompson Co-options Consulting http://www.iamdon.com [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on May 16, 2005]

Note: http://www.producer.com http://www.iamdon.com/m... http://www.iamdon.com

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Mon May 16, 2005 8:07 pm
    Well said!



    ---
    "If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill

  2. Mon May 16, 2005 10:35 pm
    Now if we could only get the family farmer to realize there are issues more vital to their livelihood than gun control. For God's sake, what have either the Conservatives or the Liberals done for the farmer?---Harper in particular. Behind those sleepy eyes there lies nothing but "deep integration". Nuff said.

  3. Tue May 17, 2005 4:15 am
    <p>First, consensus would be needed on what <i>should</i> be done for farmers, and what level(s) of government should be involved to which extent(s).</p>

  4. by hoopoe
    Tue May 17, 2005 5:06 am
    It's about time that we heard from rural voter who realizes that neither the cons nor the libs represent the common person. Hopefully, this will spread like wildfire.

  5. by N Say
    Tue May 17, 2005 8:09 am
    yes if the "Conservatives" were elected that would be the end of the Canadian Wheat Board & our supply-management systems, so Tyson would take over our poultry farms, Cargill would take over our wheat, etc etc. so they really don't believe in CONSERVing anything. Tyson produces more chicken than Canada so how would the family farms survive. Gilles Duceppe has also said that the BQ would never agree to dismantling supply management because it would be the end of dairy production in Quebec.

    ---
    "George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va

  6. Tue May 17, 2005 12:16 pm
    I don't think dismantling the wheat board necessarily means dismantling 'supply side' management. I do think the conservatives would do away with it, or at least try to, as it has become an almost bureaucratic symbol of Ottawa's 'tyranny' over the west. While canadians would like to argue differently, the fact is that third world and developing countries have been after Canada to drop its dairy and poultry marketing boards for years and are still in court over it. It IS hypocrisy that we will trade certain products on the open market, yet protect others. Of course I think that the opposite tact should be done and more markets-particularly in developing countries-should be protected, not the opposite route of dismantling all protections. Yet by dismantling the wheat board I don't think it necessarily follows that it MUST do so to other industries, since it hasn't meant that so far. Logic doesn't often apply to government activities.

  7. by hoopoe
    Tue May 17, 2005 4:16 pm
    The third world has not been the ones pushing for Canada to drop its marketing board; rather the ones who have been leading this attack at the WTO has been Europe and the US (especially the US). Even a little bit of thought would demonstrate why this is so, as the US and Europe have industrialized food production systems and produce far too much for their own needs (subsidized at that and the US actually produces far too much of their hormone laden milk but still allows growth hormones to be used). The third world is using its food production to feed their own people for the most part (if they have no extra eggs for export why would they care if Canada has marketing boards?). The one problem I have with marketing boards is that some products (butter for example) are ridiculously expensive but this can best be dealt with domestically through proper regulation.

    If farmers truly believe the CWB represents tyranny over the west, then why don't they use their power at the CWB to dismantle it themselves. Obviously, most of them know the advantages that they are getting from keeping the CWB.

  8. Tue May 17, 2005 8:23 pm
    "Tyranny over the West" = conservative talking point, nothing more. The wealthiest provinces with the largest in-migration are crying over being short-changed? I can think of a similar southern country that wants their cake and eat it too.

  9. Tue May 17, 2005 10:01 pm
    The cons will end ALL supply management marketing boards. That`s what American 'harmonization' is all about. Total corporate control, as farmers are more and more transformed into serfs.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  10. Thu May 19, 2005 5:04 pm
    As a small organic rancher I had many discussions with others over the BSE and generally the family farm problems. Right now, it is costing us $4000/year from our old age pensions to keep our cattle fed. As far we and many other family farmers and ranchers are concerned, the BSE crisis is a long term, artificial, corporate plan to destroy family farms and take them over for pennies. Some of the large so called "agribiz" corporations are buying up Canadian cattle for next to nothing, process them in their US controlled meat plants here in Canada and make fortunes by selling them across the border. The longer the crisis lasts the bigger their stolen profits. In our opinion, Canada should get off the reliance on the US market, outlaw the artificial growth hormone and steroid implants, plus the feeding of cattle with animal residues, go back to strictly natural feeds, build up a system of Canadian owned, small meatplants to serve local communities, close down the huge feedlots, especially those controlled from abroad, where most of the damage occurs and feed the world with healthy beef. Right now many countries, like the EU, reject Canadian beef because of the implants, so our governments are trying to force this criminal practice on them instead of outlawing it. Yes, it could be done, if there was a political will and we had governments free of corporate donations and ownership. Right now all they can do is sell out Canada and call it "Competitive growth of the GDP" while millions go broke and hungrier by the day. Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.

  11. Thu May 19, 2005 6:20 pm
    Yes Ed and the consumers in Canada, would also appreciate that kind of beef.

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  12. Thu May 19, 2005 6:29 pm
    The funny thing is that we can't find market for it and have to sell most of our animals at the sales, where they're bought up most of the time by the feedlots and pumped full of chemicals as they're loaded on the transports, then repeated each time they change hands, ending up with 5-6 times the recommended dosages, which in themselves are crime aginst humanity. And it isn't the price people won't pay, we don't have to charge a penny more than the usual prices and are selling our professionally prepared frozen meat for $3./lb. People will pay double of this for junk meat, as long as they can get it in the supermarkets. Figure it out. We keep on doing it as a matter of principle. Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC>



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news