I know what you’re saying, you’re saying that government is more powerful than media. Tell that to Trent Lott, formerly one of the most powerful Senators in the United States government, that is until he made an egregious faux pas during Strom Thurmond’s 100th birthday party by suggesting that the United States might be a better place to live in today if Thurmond had won the Presidential election back in 1948 and become America’s President. The problem of course was that Thurmond ran on a segregationist ticket - thus by saying what he said, Thurmond allegedly also supported segregation.
The Zionist media tore into Lott, forcing him to resign his position as the Senate Majority Leader - quite a coup if you think about it. I’m not defending Lott, I don’t like him, not for the reason that the media wants me to dislike him, but because he cowardly apologized for making a statement that could hardly be considered to be fallacious, look around you, is the United States truly a great country any longer? Before you answer that, consider that we have 20 million illegal aliens in this country, that we’ve outsourced millions of jobs, that we stripped down and sold off our entire manufacturing base in the 1980s, that we are so overwhelmed with debt that we’ll never get out of it, that we have a higher murder rate than most Third World nations, that we don’t trust each other, in fact, we really don’t like each other. Consider that most typically we don’t know our neighbors, we don’t allow our own children to play outside any longer for fear they’ll be kidnapped and subjected to horrors too terrible to even consider. Look at the quality of our television programming, our social issues, gay marriage, abortion, affirmative action, crime, etc.. etc… Sorry to burst your bubble, be this is no longer a great country period. There was a time however when our children could play outside, anytime they liked, anywhere they chose, and they could do so without being molested. There was a time when degenerate concepts like gay marriage weren’t considered important enough to spend more than a second considering. There was a time when America was more of a meritocracy, and minorities weren’t given jobs because they could claim some kind of minority status. There was a time when the networks feared the American people enough that they wouldn’t have even considered forcing us and our children to watch the crap they televise today. That time is gone, so who is to say that the United States wouldn’t today be a better place to live if Thurmond had been elected in 1948, I think it’s safe to say that it could hardly be worse.
The fact is, most Americans really didn’t care about Trent Lott’s claim, but the media did, and that’s why the issue remained before the American people for as long as it was.
Ernst Zundel is a man that is currently about to be sentenced to five years in prison for questioning certain aspects of the holocaust story, it really doesn’t matter what questions he has asked, what matters is that he’s about to be imprisoned for asking them. Zundel was living in Tennessee [That’s in America just in case you didn‘t know, where the First Amendment provides us with the right to question history any way we choose], in 2003, but our Department of Injustice had him illegally arrested [without a warrant], illegally deported to Canada [without due process] where he was then thrown into solitary confinement for two years without being charged with a crime [I‘m absolutely serious - he was NEVER charged with a crime]. He was eventually deported to Germany at tremendous expense to the Canadian taxpayer [The Canadian government arranged for this “dangerous criminal” to be flown to Germany on a privately chartered plane. I checked into this, the cost of this flight was most probably in excess of 100K]. Can you imagine? The Canadian government actually paid 100K to have someone that questions history flown out of the country in the middle of the night to another country that intends to lock him up and throw away the key for the same? Seems a bit excessive don’t you think? I mean, all he did was question some of the details associated with a historical event. Can you think of any other historical event that could result in the same type of persecution? Why the holocaust?
Do you believe the “official version” of what happened on 9-11? Believe it or not, most people don’t. A CNN Poll gathered on Wednesday, November 10, 2004 revealed that 89% of those polled believe there has been a “cover up”, of the events surrounding 9-11. Believe it or not, if you doubt the “official version” of what happened, you are NOT in the minority as the media itself would like you to believe. The CNN poll results didn’t remain on CNN’s website for long - they mysteriously disappeared not long after they were posted. This is because they didn’t jibe well with the world that CNN and other media outlets seek to create for us - they contradicted the illusory. Needless to say, CNN has never again presented a similar poll to the American people, they already know the results, they just don’t want you to know them.
The long and short of it is that people question the holocaust for exactly the same reason they question what really happened on 9-11, there are many legitimate questions, and NO forthcoming answers. In the case of the holocaust, they’ll throw you in prison for even asking questions. Does this seem like something modern democracies like Germany, Austria, France and Spain should be doing? The reality is that they do it all the time, there are thousands of people in prison in Europe today for refusing to accept a history they aren’t even allowed to question. Imagine that. But you won’t hear much about these cases in the media, primarily because these governments are embarrassed about what they do, they don’t want the truth to get out. How come?
http://pcapostate.blogspot.com/2007/01/grand-illusion.html
Posted at:
http://tinyurl.com/yss44f
Note: http://pcapostate.blogs...
http://tinyurl.com/yss44f
<a href="http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2007/02/03/2003347468">http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2007/02/03/2003347468</a><br />
<br />
"February 2, 2007, may be rem-embered as the day the question mark was removed from whether are to blame for climate change," Achim Steiner, the head of the UN Environment Program, told a news conference.<br />
<br />
Well'p were diddled!<br />
<br />
But then the announcement is somewhat anti-climatic,if ya know what I mean, Jelly-Bean?<br />
<br />
<br />
Well! that'll lar'n ya!<br />
<br />
<p>---<br> [juris ignorantia est cum jus nostrum ignoramus]<br />
<br />
it is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights" <br />
<br />
lex ferenda
<a href="http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2007/02/03/2003347468">http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2007/02/03/2003347468</a><br />
<br />
"February 2, 2007, may be rem-embered as the day the question mark was removed from whether are to blame for climate change," Achim Steiner, the head of the UN Environment Program, told a news conference.<br />
<br />
Well'p were diddled!<br />
<br />
But then the announcement is somewhat anti-climatic,if ya know what I mean, Jelly-Bean?<br />
<br />
<br />
Well! that'll lar'n ya!<br />
<br />
<p>---<br> [juris ignorantia est cum jus nostrum ignoramus]<br />
<br />
it is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights" <br />
<br />
lex ferenda
---
My freedom is more important than your great idea.
– Anonymous
Disregard cap lock
How so is there no true free speech
Is there free thought?
---
[juris ignorantia est cum jus nostrum ignoramus]
it is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights"
lex ferenda
Not realy! "Thought" is the making by a culture and upbringing.
---
Expect little from life and get more from it.
Well! we won't be having any of that shit, will we?
Imaging the future!
Imagine the boot of Tyranny on your neck, FOREVER
---
[juris ignorantia est cum jus nostrum ignoramus]
it is ignorance of the law when we do not know our own rights"
lex ferenda
I think the 60s & 70s stopped about then. From "free spirt" to "making the rules", again.
---
Expect little from life and get more from it.
Ed Deak.
My own take on "free thought" is that everyone has the ability to examine the universe and come to their own conclusions concerning various sacred cows, conventions, laws, and commonly held beliefs. Atheistic and Theistic beliefs must be equally open to scrutiny. To spare either is to defeat the purpose of the exercise.
As for "free speech", it never existed to begin with. It has always been a case of say the wrong thing about the wrong people and the boot of the state will be knocking down your door.
"Free will" does exist. It is limited by the physical universe, and by the borders of the free will of others. The only absolute free will that can exist would require the holder of that will to be powerful enough to alter the fabric of the universe. Depending on your theological POV, such a being may of may not exist. My world view says such a being exists, yours may not.
The one thing we can be sure of, however, is the desire of those people who believe they are the next "new gods" to inflict conformity to their world view on us all.
It's why they almost ALWAYS kill off the intellectuals in their bids for power.
After all, we can't have the emperor's new clothes being criticized, now can we?
---
"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"
"The Weapon" - Rush