Canadian Famine Relief: F-18s And Arms

Posted on Wednesday, November 01 at 12:42 by bracewell
CURRENT STATUS OF AFGHAN FAMINE:
AFGHANISTAN: Drought-stricken farmers appeal for urgent assistance ....Oct 30/06
Total cereals production = 4.8 million tonnes (estimate)
Domestic demand = 6 million mt.

......NW Prov of Faryab (1 million people): Farmers have lost over 80 % of their rain-fed wheat crops - 90% of the land is watered by rainfall. Water in shallow wells and traditional reservoirs have all but dried up in many parts. Nearly 40 percent of all domestic animals in the province have been sold and the sell-off continues.
......Last week, the government and UNAMA appealed for some US $43 million to cope with the urgent needs of 1.9 million drought-stricken people and around 20,000 families who have been displaced by the recent conflict in southern Afghanistan. An estimated 6.5 million people are already seasonally or chronically food insecure, officials say.
......Ameerah Haq, deputy of the Special Representative of the United Nations Secretary-General to Afghanistan said "this request is extremely time sensitive and I would like to appeal to all the donors to respond quickly and generously."
......The Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation and Development (MRRD), along with the World Food Programme (WFP), have been working to assist the most needy. But many farmers in Faryab contacted by IRIN complained that they had not received any assistance yet and said they would be forced to resort to opium cultivation to feed their families.

AFGHANISTAN: Millions face hunger as drought worsens, warns ChristianAid ....Oct 18/06
......2.5 million drought-stricken Afghans across much of the country have lost their crops and are facing acute food shortages, international aid group Christian Aid warned
......An assessment carried out mainly in the northwest, found that many people have lost 70 to 80 percent of their rain-fed crops
following too little rain last winter and spring. The drought is also acute in other parts of Afghanistan, like the southern province of Zabul. Local authorities in Helmand province had earlier appealed for urgent assistance for some 5,000 families who have been displaced by drought and recent fighting in the area.
......Another 6.5 million people are likely to suffer chronic food insecurity due to the lack of rainfall this year, Christian Aid said.

Afghan Government, UN seek $43 million more for drought and conflict victims ....Oct 22/06
Millions of Drought-Stricken Afghans Need 'Vital' Attention as winter nears ....Oct 21/06
Afghanistan Drought: Women Married Off for Income ....Oct 10/06

THE CANADIAN RESPONSE:
Canada's Afghan aid ....Oct 21/06
While Ottawa's pledge of $1 billion in aid from 2001 to 2011 is generous, it pales in comparison to our military outlay.

Canada commits six jets to NATO ....Oct 31/06
Feds seeking bids on shopping list for Afghan police ....Oct 30/06
Candian Hercs air-drop supplies to US troops ....Oct 30/06

Long-term food aid continued for poorest in Kabul ....Oct 23/06
......Canada will continue to provide emergency food aid ($2.5 million) for widows in the capital of Kabul past a planned cut-off date of March 31, after widows planned an extraordinary protest against the phase-out of food in favour of job training.
NB: Only for Kabul widows

Canadian cabinet minister makes surprise visit to Afghanistan ....Oct 23/06
......International Co-operation Minister Josée Verner announced $5 million for a program to help integrate women into local garden markets. She also announced $14.5 million for a girls' education project
NB: But no hunger relief. Canada did spend $4,000,000 for the Tim Hortons

CIDA silent on Afghan projects ....Oct 6/06
......Amir Attaran - is Canada Research Chair of Law, Population Health and Global Development Policy at the University of Ottawa.
......As a professor who studies international development, I wanted to know if our aid money — tax money — is being well spent to help Afghans.
......The information CIDA offers the Canadian public about its Afghan activities is incomplete and inaccurate. A comparison of CIDA's journalists-only project list and its public website shows that nearly every project has an inconsistency in its budget, timeline, or both. The public cannot know what CIDA plans to do with the $1 billion it plans to spend for Afghanistan this decade.
......In July, I used the Access to Information Act to ask CIDA for the "monitoring, evaluation, and/or audit reports for each CIDA-funded project ... carried out in Afghanistan."
......CIDA asked for 240 days — eight months — to divulge the monitoring, evaluation and audit reports for Canadian-funded aid projects in Afghanistan. Nothing in the Access to Information Act obliges CIDA to consult so widely or to withhold project results; the agency's officials do so by choice.
......CIDA explained that in nearly all projects, Canadian aid money is channelled through international middlemen, such as the World Bank or the UN Development Program. The middlemen commingle CIDA's money with that of other countries, and when they do, CIDA refuses to divulge any monitoring, evaluation or audit reports without the agreement of those other countries.
......CIDA has only three staffers in Kandahar, meaning it must turn to the middlemen, the same UN agencies Harper accused of being unaccountable.
......The situation is galling for the Afghans, too. When Canada channels aid through the UNDP or World Bank, it is making a choice to prefer it over Afghanistan's government. Afghans are understandably annoyed by our politicians, who talk of "strengthening Afghanistan's governance," but who deny their government's priority to govern.
......The Conservative government tells Canadians that we are at war in Afghanistan, not for reasons of belligerence, but for reasons of bringing development.

Canada delivers emergency aid and reconstruction to Kandahar ....Oct 22/06
......Canadian International Development Agency (CIDA), will provide nearly $5 million (4,400 tonnes of food) for emergency food aid for 12,000 vulnerable families from Panjwai and Zherai Districts, who were displaced by NATO from their homes during Operation Medusa.
To date [ since 2002? ] , Canadian construction and rehabilitation include:
......1,290 kilometres of roads,
......6 bridges,
......2 Km of retaining wall,
......28 small irrigation projects,
......39 schools,
......3 health clinics,
......43 drinking water facilities and
......204 dug water wells with hand pumps.
NB: CIDA has an established record of failing to deliver aid.

Harper defends slow pace of reconstruction work ....Oct 17/06

Canadian NGOs Refuse Southern Afghanistan ....Oct 21/06
......CARE and World-Vision say they have not and will not, pursue contracts with CIDA for work in Kandahar until the Canadian military focuses its efforts exclusively on security and policing efforts. This is because it is impossible to keep their people safe when Canada's military is also involved in humanitarian projects.

Note: AFGHANISTAN: Drought-s... AFGHANISTAN: Millions ... Afghan Government, UN ... Millions of Drought-St... Afghanistan Drought: ... Canada's Afghan aid Canada commits six jet... Feds seeking bids on s... Candian Hercs air-drop... Long-term food aid con... Canadian cabinet minis... $4,000,000 for the... CIDA silent on Afghan ... Canada delivers emerge... Harper defends slow pa... Canadian NGOs Refuse S...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Nov 01, 2006 9:20 pm
    As I said here:<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20061011184323106">http://www.vivelecanada.ca/article.php/20061011184323106</a><br />
    <br />
    You cannot distribute aid (unless the Taliban allows it) without securing the area first.<p>---<br>"I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden<br />

  2. Wed Nov 01, 2006 10:00 pm
    And you can't secure an area by killing most of the inhabitants.

    ---
    If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.

  3. Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:19 pm
    Actually, by definition, if most of them are dead the area is most definitely secure.

    But before proffering such inflamatory statements, perhaps you can show one instance where we killed the majority of the inhabitants?

    No? Thought so.

  4. by
    Wed Nov 01, 2006 11:46 pm
    Precision Air-Drop Capability: Candian Hercs air-drop supplies to US troops (link above)

  5. Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:00 am
    From the link:

    "We're not dropping bullets to guys running out of bullets,"

    "In Afghanistan, where Canada has no helicopters, its Hercs and the crews willing to fly them into tough spots to air-drop supplies in remote and dangerous locations have won it a reputation."

    So, we resupply our allies, they provide close air support for our troops. What's your point?

    ---
    "I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden

  6. Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:01 am
    Oh, yea, forgot one quote:

    "On board are 10 tonnes of food, water and humanitarian aid supplies."

    Aid supplies. Hmmmmmm.

    ---
    "I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden

  7. Thu Nov 02, 2006 1:53 am
    On board are 10 tonnes of food, water and humanitarian aid supplies."

    Where's it been dropped off at?

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  8. Thu Nov 02, 2006 4:25 pm
    A distribution point, I assume. That may be an American or Brit foreward base. Close to the people that need it.

    ---
    "I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden

  9. Thu Nov 02, 2006 10:32 pm
    A distribution point, I assume.,,

    I think the question still is "Where is the Famine Relief?" I recall news reports when this all started, that the US had bombed warehouses where the supplies were kept. Apparantly not intentionally but in error. So where is it now and why is it not being distributed?

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  10. Thu Nov 02, 2006 11:18 pm
    Who said it wasn't distributed? I would assume it has been, just there was more needed. Much more.

    But until roads are build, and Semi's can deliver it without hitting IED's, the UN won't distribute it in large quantities.

    ---
    "I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden

  11. Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:49 am
    BRACEWELL:
    Afghanistan is in drought, causing severe food shortages – with no meaningful response/aid from either the ISAF or Canada. Instead of exporting food-for-democracy, Canada is increasing it’s export of lethality.

    "I would assume it has been just there was more needed. Much more."

    I believe this was the subject of debate. A country being devastated by war rather then the same money and effort being put forward as aid. It don't matter if the plane carries 5 tonnes of food if it drops the equivalent in bombs first. I too, don't believe further destruction is to enable construction. I've been in countries where people live in the debris to start "a new life". They too were told the destruction had to be, inorder for them to have a better life. They didn't believe it either.

    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  12. Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:51 pm
    And that was the crux of my argument too: "with no meaningful response/aid from either the ISAF or Canada."

    ISAF and the UN will not distribute aid until the area is safe from Taliban retailiation. People are reluctant to put our soldiers in harm's way, how much are they going to like civillian aid workers getting killed by IED's?

    And my point was to address Bracewell's non-sequitr: "Instead of exporting food-for-democracy, Canada is increasing it’s export of lethality."

    Canada's export of food and aid money hasn't changed because we sent F-18's to the area. The F-18's will not be lethal to those starving and will be used to support those trying to deliver aid.

    The link he provided supports exactally the opposite of what he proports it to say; that aid is being delivered as fast as we can do it.

    "I believe this was the subject of debate."

    It is, however the more important question should be 'Why are our *soldiers* delivering aid that the UN and Afghan forces should be.' Our soldiers should be providing security for those aid workers, not distributing the aid themselves.

    ---
    "I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden

  13. Sat Nov 04, 2006 5:20 am
    Our soldiers should be providing security for those aid workers, not distributing the aid themselves.<<

    They are providing the security, by attempting to eliminate the enemy of the Western Powers. Only until Afghanistan has excepted western values, will they receive western aid. That includes all Afghani. This country will never rid itself of the Western invaders and must accomodate them if they are to survive. Even if it is to turn on their own countrymen that are struggling to stop the west. The only aid they will ever get will be like a bone given to a beaten dog. Canada may never have to give any substancial aid. I can't see the western culture acceptance in Afghanistan regardless of how many Afghani are killed.


    ---
    Expect little from life and get more from it.

  14. Sat Nov 04, 2006 9:21 pm
    In my recent issue of The Peace and War News (<a href="http://users.sgci.com/~peacenews">http://users.sgci.com/~peacenews</a> ) I quoted the recommendations by the Senlis council and by Prof. John Warnock, on how Canada should respond to famine in Afghanistan:<br />
    <br />
    The Senlis Council:<br />
    <br />
    "Due to lack of funding from the international community, the Afghan Government and the United Nations World Food Programme are unable to address Afghanistan’s hunger crisis. Despite appeals for aid funds, the US-led international community has continued to direct the majority of aid funds towards military and security operations. <br />
    "The United Nations World Food Programme has been forced to cancel plans to provide more than 2.5 million Afghans with urgent food aid," said Reinert. "Unless these needs are met, this will have dire consequences for millions of Afghans."<br />
    <br />
    As a result, support for the Taliban is increasing. "The US has lost control in Afghanistan and has in many ways undercut the new democracy in Afghanistan. I think we can call that a failure. … The US policies in Afghanistan have re-created the safe haven for terrorism that the 2001 invasion aimed to destroy." <a href="http://www.senliscouncil.net/modules/publications/013_publication/documents/modules/media_centre/news_releases/68_news">http://www.senliscouncil.net/modules/publications/013_publication/documents/modules/media_centre/news_releases/68_news</a> <br />
    The Senlis Council makes three Recommendations:<br />
    <br />
    1. Send food and water to Afghanistan now – Afghanistan’s hunger crisis must be immediately resolved.<br />
    <br />
    2. Refocus the reconstruction agenda on the poor.<br />
    <br />
    3. "Nonsensical" poppy crop eradication operations must stop immediately.<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    John Warnock writes:<br />
    <br />
    The Provincial Reconstruction Teams have all been closely integrated with the military commands, both OEF and ISAF. The UN Assistance Mission to Afghanistan has also been closely linked to the two military commands.<br />
    <br />
    InterAction, a coalition of around 160 independent aid organizations, has protested that the links between their organizations and the military organizations have undermined their efforts and made them vulnerable to violent attacks. <br />
    <br />
    There is an alternate course of action for the Canadian government. <br />
    <br />
    It would mean a return to our traditional role of peacekeeping and humanitarian aid:<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    - Withdraw all military forces from Afghanistan and withdraw from all projects being sponsored by the US government and NATO.<br />
    <br />
    - Work within the UN General Assembly to develop a new project for Afghanistan which would emphasize emergency food aid, a significant program to help Afghan farmers to produce food for their own people, and health care. This would be completely separate from any US or NATO project. <br />
    The application of this revised UN program would exclude the participation of all countries involved in the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. <br />
    - Any security forces needed to protect this UN operation would be drawn, if possible, from Muslim countries and would be financially supported by peacekeeping countries like Canada. <br />
    – John Warnock, Canada, the United States, and Afghanistan <a href="http://actupinsask.org">http://actupinsask.org</a><br />
    <br />
    In other words we have to dissociate ourselves from the US-led military activity in Afg if we want to be seen as trustworthy by the people. And seek an international framework that separates aid from all military taint.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news