Customs Officers Resume Walkouts Over Right To Carry Guns

Posted on Sunday, January 15 at 09:43 by Anonymous
The walkout coincided with the release of a study conducted on behalf of the officers' Customs Excise Union, which found that front-line customs workers -- like police officers -- need to carry weapons because of increasing dangerous situations and the risk of encountering armed terrorists at the border. He's not Packin': Canada Customs officers want more than just contraband detectors. The study, conducted by private Ottawa-based security company Northgate Group, continues by stating that the Canada-U.S. border is porous and suggests armed mobile patrols to secure it. "From assaults, to intimidation to being take hostage, these officers are faced with a daily risk to their lives … exacerbated by the unpredictability of human behaviour," the study states. The union says it's frustrated with the government's response on the issue, especially since the feds' own reports -- including a Canadian Senate report released last summer -- also recommended border agents carry weapons. In November, customs officers created traffic chaos at several border crossings in Southern Ontario when they staged a series of similar strikes over the gun issue. http://www.todaystrucking.com/news.cfm?intDocID=15625 [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 15, 2006]

Note: http://www.todaystrucki...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sun Jan 15, 2006 7:29 pm
    I can remember when the fisheries officers in BC were finaly allowed to be armed. Their justification was that they faced armed, disgruntled fishermen. Being armed did not mean packing their 357s in a side holster, but to be kept out of sight in their vehicles. Perhaps the desk drawer can be used in this case.

  2. Sun Jan 15, 2006 8:08 pm
    Tax collection, not protection, is the job of Customs Officers. The Liberals only want to ensure Canadians can't escape paying tax, the Liberals have little interest in the security of Canadians - the Party worries that actually providing security to Canadians might offend some of the activists they give our tax money to.

  3. Sun Jan 15, 2006 8:55 pm
    the front line men and woman responsible for canada's border security actually demand to be armed with weapons adequate for the 21st century?!

  4. Sun Jan 15, 2006 9:01 pm
    I agree! Arm them!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  5. Mon Jan 16, 2006 2:08 am
    Arming our customs officers means much training, and liscensing in the proper use of such weapons in all situations they may face. It's not a simple as just handing them firearms. It also means they must all have background checks, and checks of their overall mental state. Then to supply them with state of the art firearms. Major $$$$$$$$$$

  6. Mon Jan 16, 2006 5:39 pm
    And you think that this is money that is not well spent? They would have had the background checks to become customs officers in the first place, so only the actual firearms training would be necessary. That's only a couple of weeks and most of that wouldn't be range shooting or safety, it would be policy review (when you can draw your gun, which form you need to fill out if you do draw your gun, what reports need to be filed, etc...). This isn't a lot of money. Less than 10 million anyway... unless the Liberals run it, which then means 10 billion.

  7. Tue Jan 31, 2006 12:52 am
    Arming Canadian customs officers will not be cheap - there's no question about that. But for my tax money I expect Customs to keep the bad guys out at the borders. I can't believe we allow our government to maintain a policy of "if the person is dangerous, officers should withdraw". Anybody ever heard of Jonathan Yeo? My heart aches for the families of his victims - especially since this person could have and should have been detained at the border. Let's give our men and women at the border the right equipment and training to prevent as many of these situations from happening againg as we can. It would certainly be money better spent than what we wasted on the gun registry, the ad scam, the Gomery commision and countless other money ptis that sucked up millions of our tax dollars.

  8. by DSR
    Wed Feb 01, 2006 9:07 pm
    <<This isn't a lot of money. Less than 10 million anyway... unless the Liberals run it, which then means 10 billion.>>

    High-larrious. Does that include admin costs:)

    Prov gov't have experience in issuing firearms to conservation officers. Apparently it has proved surprisingly quick and cheap, despite much pants-shitting from naysayers. Time for our border guards to stop being the shopping police, picking thru Abrecrombie and Fitch T-shirts to see if Jennie has exceeded her 3-day limit. They should raise the duty-free to $5,000k and put the focus on security. That episode in BC was an embarassment. Our customs officials should not be exposed to any further risks or humiliation.

  9. Thu Feb 02, 2006 4:51 am
    Bravo DSR, well said. And if you and others wish to hear more of how our officers have been abused, threatened, beaten, held hostage at knife and gun point, etc. you should check out the Northgate report which was an independant study conducted by experts in the field of law, security, and enforcement. The study was commisioned by the Customs union and should be available at their website - search word CEUDA.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news