I'm thinking now that art trumps sedition, as we shall see below.
My kids, in their mid-teens, think I'm stuck in the '50s. That's because I like to watch old movies and things such as "Rawhide," "The Rifleman" and "The Range Rider." They know that I spent my formative years in the '50s, they know I'm a cowboy who can't hardly believe how great the Hollywood stunt riders were, even if they were pretty tough on horses. And I forbid the watching of R-rated movies. So, maybe I am, in a way. In another way, I'm cutting edge.
Have you seen the film DEATH OF A PRESIDENT?
(This major motion picture is largely suppressed in the U.S. See:
http://tinyurl.com/36kse7
Talk about cutting edge. They kill George Walker Bush on film. A Black American veteran whose son was killed in G.W. Bush's invasion of Iraq shoots him with a rifle from a high building. The feds know who killed him but they frame a Moslem for the crime, in the best Zionist tradition. Can't be giving other veterans ideas. They even have Cheney giving Bush's eulogy, using his actual eulogy for Reagan. Extremely clever and well done. And breathtaking in its audacity and concept.
I wrote another one in the early '80s, called CONSPIRACY. In it, an oilfield troubleshooter is hired by an independent oil company to try to stop apparent acts of sabotage, committed to prevent the discovery of a major oil deposit in New Mexico. The owner's daughter persuades him to help her assassinate members of the private group that actually makes the government's energy policy. I got offered a tremendous amount of money for that one by an independent movie company. They'd already, in Detroit, started filming their first project, starring Lee Marvin, Angie Dickenson and Jonathan Winters. Mine would start filming in Houston next. Then they showed the script to the movie department at Bank of America. He read it and he freaked. He shut down the Detroit project and told them they'd never make movies with BofA money. I pretty much lost interest after that, but I kept writing just because I like to write screenplays. Hollywood is a Jewish racket and they know what they're doing.
So, I'm going to sketch out my next screenplay, which I might call, BRING ME THE HEAD OF GEORGE WALKER BUSH.
Now that I know you can actually assassinate Bush in a movie and get away with it, I'm going to do it, too. That is, I'm going to have my characters do it.
First, I should explore the reasons why my characters might want to assassinate George Walker Bush. The easiest and most logical reason to kill Bush would be revenge, say that of a father for his dead soldier child. But that was just done last year in the aforementioned DEATH OF A PRESIDENT. There really must be thousands of fathers now whose sons (or daughters!) were killed or maimed or lobotomized by Bush's invasion of the Moslem lands. Untold thousands of foolish American victims, both military and their survivors. If my son or daughter had been tricked by 9-11 or some lying recruiter and got killed or destroyed in Bush's unprovoked aggression against Islam, I'd likely go after Bush. Or, If they even got some mystery illness from the eleven mystery vaccines they are forced to take by the Army, I'd also go after him. And Cheney. And everyone else I could kill that day or that week or that month. I don't get why the fathers of the victims aren't holding Bush and Cheney and the entire high command of the "Defense" Department accountable for wasting their kids' lives and the lives of too many others to count.
Or maybe I do get it. Maybe that's why my militia idea didn't work out. Maybe because this is a Christian country. Which is why I hate Christianity worse than I hate Judaism. If it weren't for Christianity there wouldn't be any Judaism because all the Jews would be dead. Judaism is protected and exalted by Christianity. Bush, if he isn't actually a Jew, is a half-assed Christian drunk who lives to transfer American wealth to Israel, the way Harry Hopkins lived to transfer American wealth to Stalin.
http://www.rense.com/general78/bring.htm
Note: http://tinyurl.com/36kse7
http://www.rense.com/ge...

There is a theory that the mind can only accommodate nine plus or minus two uniys of attention at any one time. Could that be an answer to our forgetfulness of all thr propagandas fed us? Are we over-amped on information and day to day activities that we simply haven’t the mental capacity to remember the flood of data and events we must contend with in out lives?
More importantly, does our moral compass become reset with the continuing heaps of lies fed us?
Why are we, as citizens, not citizens of conscience? Is all this state sanctioned lying OK with us?
---
"When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do."
William Blake
If this were anyone else I were responding to, I'd ask just what the paranoid anti-Jewish sour grapes ramblings of a Hollywood screenwriter have to do with Canadian nationalism or politics. But knowing your mindset as well as I've come to, I can see how you think it relevant.
There was a point where I was wishing TPTB on this site would kick your snide, bigoted ass off of it, since a more appropriate home for you is the Usenet political groups, along with the other net-kooks. But I'm hoping now that they keep you for as long as you're willing to pump out disjointed, poorly-spelled rants.
I want people to come to Vive and have your posts be the first thing they see. I want you to represent Canadian nationalism in the minds of those who poke their noses in here out of curiosity. I want them to see the Jew-haters, Marxists, crackpot wannabe economists, conspiracy nuts, bitter anti-American academics, fringe politicians and snotty paternalistic elitists and have that form their image of Canadian nationalists.
In other words, keep up the good work.
Questioning, or condemning the policies of certain governments is not "anti" of the people of those nations.
Which means that if we question the actions of the US and Israeli governments, we're not "anti American" , or "anti Jewish, or Semite" any more than the opposition in our Parliaments and Legislatures doesn't make us "anti Canadian", in spite of special interest propaganda.
I've seen a small bit of the Holocaust and have lost a number of friends in it, including one of my best and have never played chess again, in his memory.
But this doesn't mean that I shouldn't be permitted to condemn the criminal actions of the Israeli government and
others who support them.
Ed Deak.
You can only imagine in your wildest and most vivid dreams how I’ve longed for your endorsements, they give me reason to go on. To receive such praise form one such as yourself can only be enlikened to being nominated for a Nobel Prize.
It is few indeed who have the clear headed thinking to appreciate the truth of the world as it is and not as others who would deceive us would have it.
---
"When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do."
William Blake
Well then, if you're not any of these kooks, then what in the hell are you doing reading and posting in here?
Like it or not, you're a tin-foil hatter otherwise you would not take the kooks so seriously.
<br />
"We don't need a second Liberal party. Westerners, but especially Albertans, founded the Reform/Alliance to get "in" to Canada. The rest of the country has responded by telling us in no uncertain terms that we do not share their 'Canadian values.' Fine. Let us build a society on Alberta values." <a href="http://www.harperindex.ca/ViewArticle.cfm?Ref=0027">http://www.harperindex.ca/ViewArticle.cfm?Ref=0027</a><br />
<br />
Hell, I live in Alberta, and he doesn't even come near representing my views.<br />
<br />
I was rather fond of Dalton Camp. I think it's interesting that at one point, all of the major parties had the public interest at heart, which seems to indicate that for the most part Canadians prefer social investment rather than "real conservativism"<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Bring me the heads of Individualist’s detractors!<br />
<br />
<br />
Opening scene:<br />
Spoken by a Gary Cooper-ish John Galt type character<br />
<br />
“What manner of men are these to speak out against the exalted member from the “Chosen People”?<br />
The speaker continues, voice trembling with righteous indignation,<br />
“Have you not recognized the one known as “Individualist” alone has been gifted with insights no other mortal has, or will ever be again in possession of?<br />
The insights of this man can see what no others may! He “knows” the hearts of the blasphemer even before thoughts of the vicious goy leave their minds on way to their twisted mouths!! <br />
While we of the Talmud have only love in our hearts<br />
<a href="http://www.radioislam.org/islam/english/toread/jewras.htm">http://www.radioislam.org/islam/english/toread/jewras.htm</a><br />
Jewish Racism towards Non-Jews as expressed in the Talmud<br />
________________________________________<br />
"The modern Jew is the product of the Talmud..."<br />
"Babylonian Talmud", published by the Boston Talmud Society, p. XII<br />
The Jews refer to the remainder of Earths inhabitants, the non-Jewish peoples, as "Gentiles", "Goyim". Let's see what the Jewish Talmud teaches the Jews concerning the non-Jewish majority, i.e. those who are not part of Jahve's "Chosen People":<br />
"The Jews are called human beings, but the non-Jews are not humans. They are beasts." <br />
Talmud: Baba mezia, 114b<br />
"The Akum (non-Jew) is like a dog. Yes, the scripture teaches to honor the the dog more than the non-Jew."<br />
Ereget Raschi Erod. 22 30<br />
"Even though God created the non-Jew they are still animals in human form. It is not becoming for a Jew to be served by an animal. Therfore he will be served by animals in human form." <br />
Midrasch Talpioth, p. 255, Warsaw 1855<br />
"A pregnant non-Jew is no better than a pregnant animal." <br />
Coschen hamischpat 405<br />
"The souls of non-Jews come from impure sprits and are called pigs." <br />
Jalkut Rubeni gadol 12b<br />
"Although the non-Jew has the same body structure as the Jew, they compare with the Jew like a monkey to a human." <br />
Schene luchoth haberith, p. 250 b<br />
"If you eat with a Gentile, it is the same as eating with a dog." <br />
Tosapoth, Jebamoth 94b<br />
"If a Jew has a non-Jewish servant or maid who dies, one should not express sympathy to the Jew. You should tell the Jew: "God will replace 'your loss', just as if one of his oxen or asses had died"."<br />
Jore dea 377, 1<br />
"Sexual intercourse between Gentiles is like intercourse between animals." <br />
Talmud Sanhedrin 74b<br />
"It is permitted to take the body and the life of a Gentile." <br />
Sepher ikkarim III c 25<br />
"It is the law to kill anyone who denies the Torah. The Christians belong to the denying ones of the Torah." <br />
Coschen hamischpat 425 Hagah 425. 5<br />
"A heretic Gentile you may kill outright with your own hands." <br />
Talmud, Abodah Zara, 4b<br />
"Every Jew, who spills the blood of the godless (non-Jews), is doing the same as making a sacrifice to God." <br />
Talmud: Bammidber raba c 21 & Jalkut 772 <br />
________________________________________<br />
<br />
<p>---<br>"When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do."<br />
<br />
William Blake<br />
<br />
Not much to do with sovereignty, or is it, given the debate in Ontario on funding religious schools from the public purse, and the influence of some religious beliefs upon some political partys both within Canada and around the world.
Just for clarity:
Atheist – “One who has formed an active belief that there are no gods. This term differs from agnosticism which asserts no knowledge of gods and therefore concludes there are no reasons to believe in them or not to believe in them. Atheism is just as active a religious system as is Islam, Christianity or Hinduism. The difference is that the atheist belief system falls on the opposite pole of the spectrum from those religions in that it is a negative rather than a positive belief.”
Humanism is a non-theistic, non-religious ethical philosophy of life based on the principle that human beings are responsible for giving meaning and purpose to their lives relying upon their human capacities of reason and responsibility and natural and social resources.
---
When you are up to your ass in alligators it is difficult to remember that the initial objective was to drain the swamp
What got lost, so to speak, is my initial reply
“Mr Campbell raises a valid point and one I’ve often wondered about myself. We were told immediately after 9-11 there were Moslem sleeper cells waiting to spring into action at a moments notice anywhere in the United States and yet with all the havoc rained down on Moslem countries by the U.S. and all the support given Israel by the U.S, there still hasn’t been the wholesale bloodshed that we were warned of why do you suppose that is? Is it because that perhaps we have been lied to?”
Indie’s reply seems to have set the tone for this thread, something he is particularly adept at, but what the hey! If it gives him pleasure to believe he has the tone of Canadians, this site, me, Ed, anybody or anything else well… he does get to have his satisfactions filled with the replies he garners
While indie does spread his particular brand of bile with a broad brush, if that is how bile is spread, he somehow fails to see that in his doing he has become somewhat hypocritical, and yes, worse, than those he attacks.
It is a game, indies game, and some of us play along to humour him.
We all take from what we read that which we are predisposed to take.
Indie has his hinks I mine and you yours, the trick of course is to be able to not only see our, (dare I say, “individual”?) peccadillo’s but to hopefully grow by doing so.
Sort it out or set it by, the choice is ours
Not being certain can be a good thing
---
"When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do."
William Blake
Wait a minute! You have forgotten "leftist nutjobs, anarchists, terrorist sympathizers", and probably a few others too! Hell, why not "witches and heretics" while you're at it?
Seriously, you've managed to use in one single sentence most of the insulting labels used throughout our history to defend ignorance and profiteering in the name of pseudo-patriotism, while avoiding actual debate!
I guess we here can only thank you for your well-phrased and oh so credible arguments!
The Sharp Wolf
<br />
Before individualist starts his next rant using his own particular brand of logic he is advised to open his eyes to realities greater than the limited one he uses here<br />
<br />
Whenever anyone speaks of “THE Jews” as though they all are of one mind, which they are not as a visit to the above site will verify, they had better beyond even a shadow of a doubt explain what they are driving at by using all inclusive language as “THE Jews”<br />
There is no, nor will there ever be, a solid case be made for the sloppy grouping together of any nationality as if it were of one mind. <br />
indie’s modus operendi is and most likely will remain to be to set himself apart while incongruently lumping everyone else together. One of his obsessions is to have everything neatly categorised and all in place, at least in place as far as he is concerned, and yet this “individualist” as he likes to call himself is more than quick to join in harping on what are pet peeves for those with obsessive thinking. <br />
<br />
Whether he recognises it or not he has be come the very thing he argues against: stinking thinking!<br />
With all the distain he claims to have for my strawman he remains unable to not miss what he sees as an opportunity to belittle me, the person he sees himself better than. <br />
How’s that for an irony?<br />
<br />
indie is one of those who must paint others black so he will appear as white. What a strange fellow he is, and sad too<br />
<p>---<br>"When I tell the truth, it is not for the sake of convincing those who do not know it, but for the sake of defending those that do."<br />
<br />
William Blake<br />
<br />