Martin - Layton Deal A Go

Posted on Wednesday, April 27 at 11:58 by sthompson
"This agreement is fiscally responsible. It is progressive. We agreed to it because we want Parliament to work," Martin told reporters Tuesday. Martin said the deal – which could enable his government to survive – will be paid for through projected budget surpluses of $9 billion. Full article: http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2005/04/26/martin-layton050426.html Also, here's Layton's statement: http://ndp.ca/cache/ndp.ca/newsdetail/nid-2511 6/04/2005 Jack Layton's Statement on Likely Agreement in Principle for Budget 2005-06 Good afternoon: When Canadians vote NDP, they expect us to work to get something done for people and the environment. They don’t send us here to play games. They send us here to work for their families and get as much done as we can for their families, their communities and our environment – within balanced budgets. For almost a year, the NDP has worked to get things done. We’ve some victories like on missile defense. But we were unsatisfied. Because we know that minority parliaments can work for people – the NDP created medicare and pensions in them. And we were serious about wanting to get something done for people and the environment. As I said on Thursday, I think there’s a crisis of faith in politics today. Too many people think parties work for themselves, not people. Because for too long, people have voted to make life better for their families … and then waited. Waited for 12 long years for action. As I also said on Thursday, the NDP’s in no rush to judge on the scandal but we are in a rush to get something done for people and the environment. There should be an election about Liberal corruption and broken promises and there will be. I believe we have an obligation to get as much done as we can in the short time ahead – which means job one is getting a better, balanced budget passed. Because it’s long past time politics was about people. It appears likely that we will have an agreement in principle reached with the government. Families will pay less for their kids’ education. Workers will get better training. We’ll reduce pollution. Build affordable housing. Protect pensions – and have a place in the world that makes us proud. This likely agreement in principle also gives real hope that the child care money and first installment of the gas tax can start to flow back to communities. It also lets the investment in the Kyoto plan move ahead. The Liberal plan doesn’t keep our Kyoto promise. It has major flaws. But it is vital we move ahead and ensure even the most basic first steps are protected …from year one to year five. I promised to listen to Canadians and I have. What they’ve told me is they’ve waited so long for a government to act that they don’t believe politics can be about them. I believe it should be about them. Which is why the NDP’s going to try and get something done – now. I promised Canadians I’d work for a better balanced budget that invests in people and the environment. Because our economy needs an educated and trained workforce. Our economy needs to be greener. Our economy relies on economic engines in cities – and the social services families depend on. This budget isn’t perfect. But it’s better. And it’s balanced, and it includes tax reductions for small business. But it also invests in people and our environment. We came to work and we did. Thank you. [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on April 27, 2005]

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Apr 27, 2005 9:09 pm
    Finally, a man in politics who puts the needs of the people before the benefit of his own party! There are still a lot of things in the budget I don't like, but at least some of the money will go to the right places now...that is if the government lasts, a big if.

    ---
    "But I want to remind you: that you can lock up a mouse or a man but you can't lock up an idea." - Tommy Douglas

  2. Wed Apr 27, 2005 9:28 pm
    We`ll see. I`m not totally sold on Layton. He has to show me more. But if these small things in this deal can get done without the government folding in a few months, then it`s certainly better than the last 21 years.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  3. Wed Apr 27, 2005 9:40 pm
    Martin says corporate tax cuts will go ahead - if Tories support them<br />
    <br />
    Martin says corporate tax cuts will go ahead - if Tories support them<br />
    <br />
    Wed Apr 27,10:38 AM ET <br />
    <br />
    OTTAWA (CP) - Prime Minister Paul Martin says he will push ahead with tax cuts for big corporations despite his budget deal with the NDP - provided the Conservatives support the move. <br />
    <br />
    "We have pulled the large corporate tax cuts out of this budget to be pursued in a separate piece of legislation," Martin told The Canadian Press in an interview Wednesday. <br />
    <br />
    "And that separate piece of legislation we'll introduce as soon as the Conservatives or somebody say they will support it. <br />
    <br />
    "The corporate tax cuts remain intact. It's going to be up to the Conservatives to tell us whether or not they will support them." <br />
    <br />
    The promise appears to fly in the face of a deal Martin agreed to on Tuesday with NDP Leader Jack Layton. <br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1845&ncid=737&e=1&u=/cpress/20050427/ca_pr_on_na/martin_tax_cuts">http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1845&ncid=737&e=1&u=/cpress/20050427/ca_pr_on_na/martin_tax_cuts</a><br />
    <br />
    <br />
    I was against an Election right now because I didn't want Harper to get in. But I think it's time we get rid of Martin. What a SOB!! I am so angry about all I have been learning here and on my own. The NDP will get my vote this time. <br />
    <p>---<br>These days, if you are not confused, you are not thinking clearly. Mrs. Irene Peters

  4. Wed Apr 27, 2005 10:22 pm
    Sold out by the NDP :( ...

  5. Wed Apr 27, 2005 10:56 pm
    It seems to be that it was the social spending that really made Harper angry. After all the Conservative principles are that social programs are bad and corporation tax cuts are good. You must be principled after all.

  6. Thu Apr 28, 2005 1:24 am
    Sounds like Martin is feeling out the electorate while he's putting the conservatives in a corner--now the onus is on them to either sell out their base (those who want the big corporate tax cut) or stink up their populist image.

  7. Thu Apr 28, 2005 2:42 am
    Team Layton has just played a weak hand quite skillfully. It's no lose for the NDP.
    The party with the least amount of seats trying the hardest to make parliament work, this can only mean good things for the NDP. You can hear the next election campaign already:
    "Paul Martin had to be forced to the brink just to bring the type of budget Canadians are asking for, the kind of thing HE HIMSELF CAMPAIGNED ON IN THE LAST ELECTION!"

    This move, regardless of whether it passes or not, will help prevent those vulnerable voters going to the Liberals instead the NDP out of the fear that they'll be electing Harper.

    Go Jack go!


    ---
    "The very fact that the concept "anti-American" can exist exhibits a totalitarian streak that's pretty dramatic." Noam Chomsky

  8. by avatar Dino
    Thu Apr 28, 2005 3:32 am
    I hope the NDP runs a campaign on keeping Canada independent from the united states. Sadly though it will be about gomery and "national unity." I believe Jack will aslo gain from this in a big way. It will show Liberal voters (most of them are on the left wing) that Paul Martin had to be in a crisis to actually begin to work for the people.

  9. Thu Apr 28, 2005 4:44 am
    I am so sick of these games, if the corporation didn't fund those parties, we wouldn't be in the sponsorship crisis, and nobody would owe these guys squat. We the people would come first and that is just not happening. I am seriously looking at CAP again, I liked them in the past and I just checked out their website and it is updated, and I like what I see. I especially like the free votes, I am quite frankly tired of people being elected by the people, and then answering to the party line!



    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  10. Thu Apr 28, 2005 5:01 am
    Jack Layton made me proud today. He was true to the high
    principles of the old CCF/NDP and won for Canadians
    affordable housing, tuition reduction, better training through E.I.,
    environmental protection, foreign aid, and workers pension fund
    protection.

    Perhaps Paul Martin was honouring his father's legacy, too, in
    agreeing to this bargain. Well done, both Martin & Layton.

    But ... but Stephen Harper ... who last month meekly accepted the
    Budget and saw no flaw in it ... Harper is now setting his hair on
    fire ... preparing to tear down the government ... and possibly the
    country ... because why? Because (he says) the Budget is not
    perfect?

    And I thought Stockwell Day was an idiot.

    ---
    Mary

  11. by avatar Spud
    Thu Apr 28, 2005 8:34 pm
    What corporate tax cuts?They don`t pay tax!For chrissake,0-0=0.
    Now they say it will cost jobs.Huh?NAFTA is about JOBS,JOBS,JOBS!
    Layton has a lot of work to do,I personally don`t feel he is smart enough or capable enough to do the job.
    Yeah,ol Martin is trying to see if Harper has what it takes.

  12. Thu Apr 28, 2005 9:20 pm
    I`m still wondering whatever happened to the Romanow Report and scrapping NAFTA?

    ---
    Dave Ruston



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news