Three Blind Mice (Martin, Manly, McLellan); The Task Force On The Future Of [Nor

Posted on Monday, March 07 at 18:04 by Anonymous

If it weren't so sad it would be laughable.

The so-called 'Task Force' (accountable to no one, conducting "talks" secretly) calls for:

1. A North American "brand name" - to be reinforced through the education system! (Don't say 'Canada' or 'Canadian' any more. In the Gutless New World, it's "North American!")
2. Increased "consultation" on monetary policy, with the understanding that some form of North American currency union could become feasible in the future. (Goodbye social programs and financial sovereignty)
3. Military integration into the American forces (why even bother arguing about missile defence?).
4. A "resource pact" pertaining to (OUR) oil, gas and fresh water! (For use in America, not here)
5. A "North American" security perimeter and passport (Canada = America)
6. A "harmonized"(?) border system (no independent health, safety standards, etc.)

The report goes on. I don't want to list the rest of it, because I'm getting sick to my stomach while writing this. It's disgusting to see the leaders of our country on their knees. (Why the word "North"? Take it out and it makes more sense...)

We have the three blind mice leading us. Or maybe the Three Stooges. One would have to hear, see, and speak no evil not to understand where this is heading. SHAME ON OUR MOUSE-LIKE LEADERS!

As citizens, we need a voice. As activists, we can educate and agitiate--but we CANNOT legislate! Look to your smaller parties!!! The NDP, The Canadian Action Party . . . Nothing could be worse than this!
Let's find some better leaders with backbone and a lack of experience, rather than experienced "yes-men" cowards.

John Riddell

[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on March 10, 2005]

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue Mar 08, 2005 2:52 am
    Realistically Mr. Riddell, what are your plans to deal with it? CAP is not a good option, they're too small. What about the NDP? Why don't you pressure Jack Layton to at least come out in public against this?

    ---
    The midget, Bush, and that Rumsfield deserve only to be beaten with shoes by freedom loving people everywhere.

    - Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, The Iraqi Informat

  2. Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:29 am
    It would be nice to see a set up on vive, where people can send letters to all three Liberal stooges. Let's flood their email.

    Kevin

  3. Tue Mar 08, 2005 3:54 am
    I'm in if you set it up Kev.

  4. Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:42 am
    I'm in as well. These three stooges are truly obnoxious
    -- if they want to join the US why don't they just move to
    Washington, D.C. and be done with it. It would be no
    loss to Canadian politics -- in fact it would be a great
    gain. If Canada has to "join" a club, I say get the
    application going to join the EU. Why this blind desire to
    jump on a sinking ship captained by an insane and
    dangerous fool?

  5. Tue Mar 08, 2005 8:59 am
    Thanks to some influential Canadians (and a good New York advertising agency) we are now all careening down a hill with the Canadian public starting to shout "stop" while others are pumping the gas pedal. Our relationship with the U.S. has changed dramatically in the last few years and so has U.S. foreign policy.

    The United States Foreign Office's new policy towards Canada can best be described as Taiwan-Lite. Taiwan is a free and democratic state at the whim of U.S. national interest- It looks like a country but it is lacking an essential ingredient called self-determination- the political separation of a nation from alien national bodies, the ability to freely act on the will of its own people. The U.S. provides military protection, aide, and sovereign recognition to Taiwan and core American values would dictate that self-determination would be granted to any other state, yet U.S. national interest overrides these values and any attempt by Taiwan to permanently separate from China has brought down the obtuse wrath of the U.S.

    Canada, on the other hand, instead of being denied self-determination is freely giving it up for commercial gain at a break-neck speed. We have become so economically dependant upon the U.S. that political decisions, which should be weighed in the interests of and by the will of its people. are now agonized over long periods of time because of the perceived wrath of a foreign country which wields unnatural economic power over our nation. We've come so far down this road that a foreign ambassador is instructed by his superiors to shout directions to our leaders and publicly admonish them without a care for civilized protocol. Welcome to Taiwan-Lite.

    WE MUST GET OUT OF NAFTA

  6. by johnr
    Tue Mar 08, 2005 4:13 pm
    I'm in too. Let's do it!

  7. Tue Mar 08, 2005 6:28 pm
    I guess I'll use the word that none of you seem prepared to consider. That word is boycott.
    If you really believe the things you blog about you would not buy American goods or products. Not their vegetables in winter, not their music, not their movies. You would not sell them anything. Not your beef, not your hardwood, not your garbage, and not your water. If you aren't willing to do that then you just want to negotiate more. You just want what everybody else wants, a better deal.
    The left has a pet project which arranges the world according to the very Free Trade agreements that it hates. It is called the Kyoto Accords and strips our rights in one big gulp. Canadians are free to complain, not decide. This law is possibly the worst attack on workers that we've witnessed. The damage remains to be seen.
    I can't afford many bright ideas like that so I think I'll just wait this boycott out. Remember too many bright ideas is what bankruptcy court is all about.

  8. by johnr
    Wed Mar 09, 2005 12:09 am
    Got under your skin, did it?

  9. Wed Mar 09, 2005 5:58 pm
    <p>""" Remember too many bright ideas is what bankruptcy court is all about. """ <p>Speaking of bankruptcy. And I understand that this is not relevant to this topic. But since you mentioned bankruptcy. What would bankruptcy be like in Canada, if we adopted U.S policy. <p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/09/business/09bankruptcy.html?hp&ex=1110430800&en=0fe9010b66c74656&ei=5094&partner=homepage"><b>Banks, Credit Card Companies Celebrate Impending Victory on Bankruptcy Bill</a></b> New rules will squeeze blood from turnips. <a href="http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/opd/opdpenny.htm"><b>World's largest debtor unaffected.</b></a> <p>Kevin

  10. Wed Mar 09, 2005 6:09 pm
    Everyone e-mail the site admin. I think Jesse still takes care of the construction of the site. See what he can set up.

    With the Liberal's shooting for mojority, which I think they will get it. It would be a good thing maybe to have all Liberal MP's masse email option on here.

    Kevin

  11. Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:34 pm
    We can all write a letter to Martin, and blast him for
    this.
    My letter, as follows.

    Dear Prime Minister:

    the following notice came to me via a friend. (= Riddell's
    press release. el. )To say I was shocked is a huge
    understatement!

    Let me be plain: an agenda, such as the following, set
    by an unaccountable treasonous committee plotting to
    sell me down the river, or better put, south of the line, is
    absolutely outrageous. Have you people no brains, or
    are you traitors, to allow this? I quote:

    "1. A North American "brand name" – to be reinforced
    through the education system! (Don't say 'Canada' or
    'Canadian' any more. In the Gutless New World – it’s
    North American!)"

    How outrageous! My family came to Canada to escape
    communism. We could have gone to the USA but
    wisely, my parents chose not to, feeling Canada had
    more European values.
    These are the values your committee is conspiring to
    trade for a future as part of a burgeoning
    corporate/military dictatorship!


    "2. Increased 'consultation' on monetary policy, with the
    understanding that some form of North American
    currency union could become feasible in the future.
    "(Goodbye social programs and financial sovereignty)

    Well, yes, we all know what happened to Argentina
    when they adopted US currency. They went broke. You
    cannot plan Canada's economy to fit Washington's
    monetary policy.

    For God's sake who would be dumb enough to call for
    monetary union with the biggest debtor country in the
    world. Are those committee members brain dead? I
    never did think Mr. Manley the smartest man alive, but
    that he should be this dumb? I am flabbergasted. Mr.
    D'Aqino has been in the service of American Corporate
    interests for years. Why doesn't he just move down
    there, and leave Canada alone!

    "3. Military integration into the American forces "(why
    even bother arguing about Missile Defence?).

    Do we really want our youth fighting for the US
    corporate elites, such as Big Oil? Breathing in DU dust,
    and other illegal, toxic weapons they deploy? I do not
    want my grandchildren exposed to this sort of hazard!

    "4. A 'resource pact' pertaining to (OUR) oil, gas – and
    fresh water! "(for use in America, not here)

    When the Russians occupied the Czech Republic, they
    took out all the uranium (one of the largest deposits),
    and moved them to Russia. This will happen to our oil
    and water, it will not help Canada to thrive, but those
    folks south of the line.
    And I bet they will still be putting up tariffs against our
    wood and beef. Let's get real, Prime Minister! These
    committee members should be tried for treason!

    "5. A 'North American' security perimeter and Passport
    (Canada = America)"

    But I bet it will be of two levels. We'll have the North
    American passport, and the Americans will have a
    higher grade US one. Not that I want to carry a US
    passport. In more and more countries it's a passport to
    getting kidnapped and killed. My friends tell me that
    more and more Americans carry a pack with a
    Canadian flag sown on it, when they travel.

    Canada's passport has for years been highly
    respected. This is the passport we want to give up?
    Let's get real!

    "6. A 'harmonized'(?) border system (no independent
    health, safety standards, etc.)" This means US
    controlled, of course!

    Let me put it plainly: I do not want to be harmonized with
    the USA. This newspeak that still means they will own
    us is not acceptable to me. It is not in the best interests
    of my family, and the country I love, Canada.

    Finally, if Mr. d'Aqino, and Mr. Manley think that
    propaganda will sell us this bag of US subversion, they
    are fools. Millions of us in Canada, those millions of
    new Canadians, immigrants and refugees from
    various "isms", are not gullible. We've heard lies before,
    and have a fine sense for detecting them. I've heard the
    Nazi version and the Communist version. I am not
    buying the US corporatocracy's version.

    You and the Liberal Minority Government are still
    presumably a Canadian Government, and are
    supposed to protect Canada, and her citizens'
    interests.

    I demand that you put an immediate stop to this
    committee's outrageous antics and dissolve it. If you do
    not have that power, what is their business planning
    something for the Canadian government, and the
    people of Canada?

    I demand this committee be dissolved, and their
    subversive plans repudiated.

    Eva Lyman
    Celista, BC

  12. Wed Mar 09, 2005 8:57 pm
    The Vive board has already said in our meetings that we want to go forward with actions around the task force, and an email campaign would probably be a great place to start. It might be very worthwhile to email politicians and ask them to highlight/raise more outcry over this issue; it might also be worthwhile to email the three Ms with reasons why deep integration is NOT a good idea and why we oppose it. So I have emailed our governing and advisory boards and asked them to check out this conversation so we can make a final decision on setting up an email campaign and get that going. Meanwhile please keep the suggestions coming. How can we best apply pressure here? And what else could we do? (posters? bumper stickers? protests? etc etc?)

    ---
    Now call it extreme if you like, but I propose we hit it hard, and we hit it fast, with a major, and I mean major, leaflet campaign.--Rimmer, Red Dwarf

  13. Wed Mar 09, 2005 11:35 pm
    This is a good thing, Susan. We need more pressure on them. I`ve e-mailed countless politicians countless times about many different issues! And if they still don`t listen.... GENERAL STRIKE! Look at the farmers blocking traffic on the 401! We`ve all got to get in on it!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  14. Thu Mar 10, 2005 3:28 am
    Although it is a good idea to e-mail government ministers, one can also heighten awareness by crafting a news release to be sent to major newspapers. Your small local free advertiser type newspapers also accept 'opinion' pieces or letters to the editor. Further, specific columnists such as Foreign affairs writers and Canadian International writers such as G. Dyer etc may be sparked to comment on aspects of this. And of course, there is the Counsel of Canadians. Another way to get the word out is to have an easy Logo link to Vive Le Canada which can be dropped onto ones blog site. This may move the site higher up the google search if enough are out there. Just some ideas.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news