CAP Condemns The Deep Integration Plan

Posted on Friday, May 20 at 12:17 by whelan costen
Fogal, a lawyer, insisted, "The implementation of any of the recommendations would be a fundamental violation of our constitutional rights as Canadians and tantamount to treason."

"The Leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the U.S met earlier this year to sanction this process. Canadians are entitled to full knowledge of and debate about the plan that will destroy us as a nation and enslave us as a people," demanded Fogal

The recommendations call for: -permanent North American tribunal power that exceeds power of national governments

-permanent rights of corporations that supercede rights of citizens
-elimination of monetary sovereignty -a common security perimeter by 2010.
-a North American Border Pass with biometric identifiers.
-a unified border action plan and expanded border customs facilities.
-a common external tariff.
- seamless movement of goods within North America.
- full labor mobility between Canada and the U.S.
- a regional alternative to Kyoto.
- Expand NAFTA's power
-a North American regulatory plan that would include "open skies and open roads" on food, health, and the environment. -a North American control over immigration.

Contact Connie Fogal at conniefogal@telus.net
www.CanadianActionParty.ca

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Fri May 20, 2005 7:32 pm
    Finally a leader of a political party, has the guts to tell it like it is! Bravo, Connie Fogal!

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  2. Fri May 20, 2005 7:37 pm
    But . . .But . . .'Deep Integration' doesn't exist! An Anon told me so! ;)

    Good article! People do need to know. Some of those 'progressive' steps would be good for Canada (open skies comes to mind) but most would be very very bad.


    ---
    "If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill

  3. Fri May 20, 2005 8:00 pm
    Open skies, what so we have no control over what flies overhead? Open roads? No restrictions on transporting whatever from wherever? Maybe its just me, but I can't like any of this stuff.

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  4. Fri May 20, 2005 8:28 pm
    It's not just you, Whelan.
    One of the first things that any sane government would look at, in my opinion, would be the re-regulation of air travel at a minimum, and perhaps even the re-nationalization of Air Canada.
    Not only in Canada, but in the US as well, the airlines have shown themselves to be completely incapable of staying afloat without huge subsidies and bailouts.
    Why not just buy them instead of giving them money to exist?
    No thanks to deep integration of transportation.

    ---
    "The very fact that the concept "anti-American" can exist exhibits a totalitarian streak that's pretty dramatic." Noam Chomsky

  5. Sat May 21, 2005 12:58 am
    For once, I agree.

    Shut down the borders.

    Close the airspace.

    Make 'em ship their goods to another country, and refuse to take any of theirs.

    In fact, shut down their factories, so our jobs come back home!

    No trade with the bastards North of the border!

  6. Sat May 21, 2005 1:52 am
    We Bastards north of the border have a saying: "be careful of what you wish, as it could be fullfiled".

    Stop the trade in oil and natural gas, and within days mayhem is everywhere in the mighty usa.

    Not entirely a bad idea, but remember it was yours!

    djammer

  7. by avatar Dino
    Sat May 21, 2005 1:53 am
    How long do you think America will last without out oil and natural gas? I agree let's close the border because Canadians can do things on our own and don't need the United States.

  8. Sat May 21, 2005 2:33 am
    Right. YOU own those factories. YOU own those pipelines. YOU own the refineries that will process the output. YOU will ship YOUR produce someplace else.

    One question: who else will buy surplus Canadian hydro-generated electricity? (Australia? Japan? France? Think a little bit.)

    Now think: who owns the factories in which laborers amuse themselves in which country?

    Now think: which country needs the other most?


    Eh?

  9. Sat May 21, 2005 3:14 am
    The best thing about Connie...she didn't wreck the Canadian military, unlike the previous leader of CAP.

  10. Sat May 21, 2005 3:46 am
    America needs Canada more.

    American SUVs without gas.

    American air conditioners in Atlanta and Phoenix and LA without power in summer.

    American power grid closed down - no NY Stock Exchange and no subways nor traffic lights.

    Every northern American state sees massive layoffs because factories without power. Riots start.

    America can't train troops to attack Canada because no electricity or natural gas to run training bases. Jets sit on tarmac unable to bomb Canada because of lack of fuel. M1A1 Abrahms are just paperweights without fuel.

    WalMart shoppers in arms because they can't get those low low prices in the dark.

    Yep we REALLY need you guys to keep on manufacturing, to keep on moving around, to keep our economy moving - after all - your factories will be shut down- you will need everything imported - and we have all the gas. We have you by the balls but your just too dim to see it.

  11. Sat May 21, 2005 4:04 am
    So true. America needs our resources. We can easily diversify trade in value added manufactured goods. But America can`t say no to our oil and gas, not to mention water!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  12. Sat May 21, 2005 5:37 am
    One question: who else will buy surplus Canadian hydro-generated electricity? (Australia? Japan? France? Think a little bit.)

    If memory serves y'all don't buy the surplus, Califoria steals it. Great "neighbour"

    ---
    "There are two ways to slide easily through life: to believe everything or to doubt everything. Both ways save us from thinking."
    Alfred Korzybski

  13. Sat May 21, 2005 7:52 am
    <p>Gotta give John Doe his due for derailing the discussion on the pros and cons of open skies… :*(</p>

  14. Sat May 21, 2005 9:59 am
    Were you in the Canadian Military? Most people who have some experience say that Hellyer was responsible for many great things, improvements in pay and equipment, he made a mistake on the unified uniforms, but that was a minor compared to the good he did! The fact that the military has been underfunded for many years since Hellyer was in charge, is not his fault. That lays flat on the Libs and Cons of late.

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news