The Pentagon outlined the new standards to the military in a 7 July memo.
The directive says all military detainees are entitled to humane treatment and to certain basic legal standards when they come to trial, as required by Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions.
"It is not really a reversal of policy - humane treatment has always been the standard"
Tony Snow, White House spokesman
Send us your comments
The Bush administration has come under intense and sustained international criticism for its treatment of prisoners held at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/5169600.stm
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on July 11, 2006]
Note: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2...

"President Bush has long fought the idea that US detainees were prisoners of war entitled to Geneva Convention rights"
and also state:
"When the detention centre (= Guantanamo Bay) was established in 2002, President Bush ordered that detainees be treated "humanely, and to the extent appropriate and consistent with military necessity, in a manner consistent with the principles of Geneva"."
Or am I missing something inhumanely wrong?
There is humane treatment (which is debatable that they were recieving) in accord with the Conventions, and the *full* protections of the G.C. that include that they will not face criminal procecution and be released after the 'War'. Criminal procecutions and indefinite interrment is excatally what they were facing, before the Supreme court ruled.
---
"I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden
1) living up to treaty agreements
2) inner city education
3) the environment
4) fair business practices
5) civil liberties
6) nuclear disarmament
7) the well being of workers displaced by offshoring their jobs
I could add to the list but I trust I have made my point
---
"and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"
"The Weapon" - Rush