Open Letter To Canadian Patriots

Posted on Wednesday, February 15 at 12:24 by whelan costen
If you have had enough, then now is the time to act. We need to demand ‘transparent accountability’ to the Canadian people. We need to do it through letters, telephone calls, faxes and if necessary public meetings. Although the media has given this issue some coverage, very soon they will turn to another sensational story and forget this one entirely, unless we demand otherwise. There is nothing this government would like more than for the public to tire of the fight and go back to allowing them to rule as the ruling class elite is wont to do. You deserve answers. You deserve change and only you can affect that and make it happen. CAP has expended its energy and resources to the limit of what is humanly possible during the election campaign to try to bring these issues to the public. We have broadcast the facts on our website (www.canadianactionparty.ca) in the hopes that the public would at least be curious enough to find out what has been going on. All of our candidates attempted to bring the issues forward during candidate debates, but were virtually ignored by media. We will continue to fight on behalf of all Canadians, but we need the people who want these changes to help us to make it happen. We are willing to help, we will use all our resources as we have done since our beginnings. Ultimately, the ball is in your court. What are you going to do? Join us in this very critical battle or wring your hands helplessly? Yours sincerely Catherine Whelan Costen Canadian Action Party President & Communications Director February 14, 2006 Dear Members of Parliament I think it is abundantly clear that the Conservatives campaigned on accountability and standing up for Canada, but that on day one they dropped the ball. It should also be very clear by now that Canadians have had enough of the spin, the rhetoric and the arrogance of politicians. We don’t want the pretense of democracy - we want democracy! Canadians are watching and are not at all impressed with Mr. Harper's appointing a member to the Senate who wouldn't even take the time to run in the election and another who clearly was elected to bring Liberal policy to parliament. He claimed on election night he would be a strong part of the opposition, he would be in the Conservatives' face, and that is what the people in Vancouver-Kingsway riding apparently wanted. What they got is something entirely different! This is not accountability to Canadians. What are you going to do to stop this? Canadians want a by-election in Vancouver-Kingsway. Canadians do not accept the Tory appointment of an unelected member to the Senate(when they campaigned on an elected senate), surely there must be someone elected by the people who can fill these positions. This is the way the news is reporting and for the most part this is the way Canadians see it, only worse; 'Since then, Emerson's work on the softwood lumber file has been questioned, he's contemplated quitting politics and his cabinet reward has formally been referred to Parliament's ethics commissioner by the NDP. -Michael Fortier, the unelected Conservative campaign co-chairman who was elevated to cabinet and given a Senate appointment, told reporters he hadn't run for office because he didn't feel like it. -Gordon O'Connor, the new defence minister, is being challenged because of his past work as a military procurement lobbyist. His new job will put him in charge of massive spending on military procurement. -Ted Menzies, the affable Alberta MP, was made parliamentary secretary for the francophonie and official languages, although he speaks no French. -Ontario MP Garth Turner, a former cabinet minister in the Brian Mulroney government, spoke openly about his disdain for Emerson's floor-crossing and was called on the carpet by Harper - only to write about the dressing down on his web site. Turner now plans to introduce a private member's bill calling for floor-crossers to face voters in byelections."http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/Politics/2006/02/10/pf-1436121.html I would like you to tell me clearly if you support this process that Mr. Harper has taken. Mr. Turner's legislation may work for the future, and we certainly want recall legislation included in any such bill, but that will not address the current unaccountable actions. Are you standing with Mr. Harper, Mr. Emerson and Mr. Fortier? Is Mr. O'Connor's appointment acceptable to you? What floor did Mr. Emerson cross? There was no floor at the time of his appointment. Many Canadians recognize,(although he wouldn't discuss it during the election) that Mr. Emerson's involvement in the Security and Prosperity Agreement (the plan for Fortress America by 2010) is critical to its success and that is perhaps why he was so easily embraced by Harper's government. Many Canadians do suspect that the plan for fortress America is underway and that both Liberals and Conservatives are pushing it through without a mandate from the people. This is not democracy! If cabinet ministers can simply be appointed, then why waste our time and money on the pretense of an election? If members can run on a party platform simply to ensure their election, but not represent the people once they are elected, then Canadians are not being served in a democratic process. True, Canadians are angry about the Liberals mismanagement of our public purse, but we are equally angry about the total arrogance of government that seeks to reward their friends and uses our money to do it. We are angry at the years of unaccountability to the people, by both Liberal and Conservative governments, the lack of democracy in the electoral process and the lack of transparency in all areas of government. We are angry that both the Liberals and Conservatives have been pursuing a 'war agenda' that we the people are against! It is not now nor has it ever been the children of the elite that are sacrificed in wars; rather it is the middle-class and poor youth who are sent to do battle for the elite. Many Canadians refused to vote in this last election and many have stated the reason is because the system is flawed beyond anything that resembles a democracy. If you expect Canadians to respect your position as an elected member of our government, then you must earn that respect through your actions and those actions must pay the greatest respect to the people of Canada. If you continue to support a system which rewards backroom deals, follows mandates of your parties rather than the people of Canada, arrogance towards those who elect you and a total disregard for reforming the electoral, Parliamentary, and senate system to make these processes truly democratic, then you will continue to reap the contempt of the Canadian people. I look forward to your position and comments on this issue, but most of all I look forward to real action to remedy the democratic deficit in our country. Every Canadian who aspires for a truly democratic country needs to stand up now! Every party spoke about accountability during the election campaign, now it is time for you to work together and give Canadians the government we deserve not the one, we keep getting! Yours truly Catherine Whelan Costen Canadian Action Party President & Communications Director cc: Members of Parliament; Media, Leaders of Canadian Political Parties [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on February 16, 2006]

Note: www.canadianactionparty.ca http://cnews.canoe.ca/C...

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Feb 15, 2006 8:54 pm
    Hey!! NO FAIR!!
    this is canada and I demand those with political acumen do it for me!
    he said tongue in cheek

    Jack Kennedy had this much right
    "Ask not what your country can do FOR you..."

    ---
    Nothing in this World makes People so Afraid as the Influence of an Independant Minded Individual.
    Attrib. Al EINSTEIN

  2. Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:05 pm
    Good point, and I believe that is something Canadians need to embrace, we've been discouraged from being active, we've been continually told 'we' know what is best for you, you stay out of it. It is time for us to dig into the entire mess and demand to be heard.

    One question I don't hear is; where is that Moral authority to govern - that the Conservatives claimed the Liberals didn't have? Does Emerson a Liberal of that government Harper condemned, have that Moral authority?

    ---
    If I stand for my country today...will my country be here to stand for me tomorrow?

  3. by Innes
    Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:13 pm
    The Progressive Canadians are getting the same kind of response from people: What can we do?

    However, whenever those of us who are political activists try to do something we are ignored because we are not important enough. The cult of the star leader is too ingrained in our culture to make it possible at the moment for ordinary citizens to create any kind of movement towards getting something accomplished.

  4. Wed Feb 15, 2006 9:22 pm
    I just see your post as another part of the political game. I'm sure every party has repeated your words in one form or another. Apppeal to the masses. Appeal to justice and openness. Bla bla bla.

    As a Canadian, I'm grateful for the chance I had to spank the "powers that be" last month. And I'm very happy that we have a government on a very short leash, regardless of who is actually supposed to run the show.

    I think you're just like the other politicians. I'm generally happy where Canadian politics stands right now... nobody has absolute authority. And I'm sure the CAP would end up being just as corrupt and double-speaking as any other party that gains power, so I don't see what differentiates you from the group.

    There you have it.

  5. by avatar Milton
    Wed Feb 15, 2006 10:43 pm
    Don't do anything because no change would make any difference, eh Stoutlimb? The fact that CAP would bring in proportional representation means nothing to you because everybody is corrupt. Or is it that finding ways to insulate our political system from corruption,(like submitting the budget to the country for passage by referendum), would spell the end for you and the others who feed at the public trough? Abrogating NAFTA and the FTA and the FTAA and the WTO not to your liking? Taking away private banks ability to manufacture Canadian money out of thin air to lend to foriegn corporations to buy Canadian resources for nothing seems like a good idea to you?

  6. Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:00 pm
    weak troll!
    wrong bait!!
    no seegar!

    ---
    Nothing in this World makes People so Afraid as the Influence of an Independant Minded Individual.
    Attrib. Al EINSTEIN

  7. by Innes
    Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:00 pm
    You haven't "spanked" anyone except a few politicians. The "powers that be" are still firmly in place perhaps even more so. Look at who applauded Emerson for crossing the floor and Harper for selecting him for a postion of power. Look who applauds the elevation of Fortier to the Cabinet without having to go through the bother of getting elected. Watch who appauds a high level patronage appointment. That tells you who is in charge.

    What the voters have done is try to make the best of a bad situation but nothing has really changed.

  8. Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:06 pm
    "Don't do anything because no change would make any difference, eh Stoutlimb?"

    Rather, I like the change that has happened better than the alternatives. So far.

    "The fact that CAP would bring in proportional representation means nothing to you because everybody is corrupt."

    No, I think prop rep is great. I think regional representation should balance it out. I think our system is doing just fine balancing these out.

    "Or is it that finding ways to insulate our political system from corruption,(like submitting the budget to the country for passage by referendum), would spell the end for you and the others who feed at the public trough?"

    I feed at the public trough? News to me. Try not to insult people you don't know. And I'm happy the previous administration was spanked by the public for corruption. I'm looking forward to see what changes the new admin will bring regarding this.

    "Abrogating NAFTA and the FTA and the FTAA and the WTO not to your liking?"

    I think we have to take a long, hard, sober look at these agreements and how they benefit Canada. Don't put words in my mouth.

    "Taking away private banks ability to manufacture Canadian money out of thin air to lend to foriegn corporations to buy Canadian resources for nothing seems like a good idea to you?"

    Monetary reform is important. I just don't think a new party is the answer to every problem.

    That's what it boils down to. I'm not impressed every time a new party shows up with new ideas. It still means that someone, somewhere, is trying to get power for themselves, so I will take all claims with a degree of cynicism.

    Remember, you are supporting a political party, run by self-serving politicians, not the next reincarnation of Christ.

  9. Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:08 pm
    I think long term stability, mixed with genuine freedom, is what makes our country great and unique. I have no doubt that Canadians will deal strongly with any real threat to our freedoms.

  10. by Deacon
    Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:10 pm
    This here's the new boss, same as the old boss.

    The political hydra's still in charge and it's Liberal head is wounded, therefore you will see the Conservative head until such time as it gets chopped. You will then see the Liberal head yet again.

  11. by Innes
    Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:53 pm
    I was listening to CTV Newsnet where three party "spin masters" were being interviewed. When the issue of Emerson came up Geoff Norquay the Conservatives spin-master responded that "the people who count" in the BC business community approve of the Emerson deal with Harper. Would that not mean voters, party members, etc. don't count.

    This illustrates the point I made above.

  12. Thu Feb 16, 2006 12:53 am
    I am beginning to enjoy this Stoutlimb individual, because he is such an easy target and only opens his mouth to change feet.<br />
    “Try not to insult people you don't know”<br />
    I see Kinda like you do eh?<br />
    Give it up Stout! You violate almost every thing you accuse others of.<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Alliance">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadian_Alliance</a> <br />
    Speaking of New parties Stout, the present party on office is the new party!<br />
    But then fact plays little role in your hallucination of the world and it was brought together by deceit, something you appear to subscribe to.<br />
    <p>---<br>Nothing in this World makes People so Afraid as the Influence of an Independant Minded Individual.<br />
    Attrib. Al EINSTEIN

  13. Thu Feb 16, 2006 2:24 am
    I'd be just as happy if the present party were NDP, CAP, or BQ. (Well maybe a bit less happy about the BQ, but whatever.) The point I was trying to make is I'm happy about the fact it's a minority government, because I hold most politicians in an equally cynical light. I believe that the safest thing for Canada is if they all kept each other on a short leash.

    Speaking of deceit and hypocrisy... You favour censorship of the Denmark cartoons. Who would you have make up Canadians minds for them? The media that you hate so much?

    I think we're all hypocrites to one degree or another. It's good to call each other on it, so we can refine our own world views. I consider Vive just as much a learning experience as a soap box.

    Damn I love blogs.

  14. by hoopoe
    Thu Feb 16, 2006 6:36 am
    "Monetary reform is important. I just don't think a new party is the answer to every problem."

    So you think the answer is to continue supporting the same old parties who have no intention of bringing in the policies of CAP that you have just listed here and apparently agree would be good for Canada. You comments here belie your assertion that everything is working fine the way it is now. Perhaps you should come to grips with the fact that what you believe in isn't being represented by the parties you seem to be voting into office.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news