The Report, commissioned at the Bush, Martin, Fox
summit in April 2005 and delivered to all three, one
month later, specifying the initial steps required to
acjieve Mr. Bush's fatal vision of Fortress America,
recommends the following actions by the year 2010 :-
1. The integration of the armed forces of all three
countries under a single command structure.
2. The elimination of borders between all three
countries.
3. The development of a common continental economy
with a single currency.
4. The adoption of a common North American
passport.
The concept of Fortress America is terminal folly, in
this era of nuclear proliferation, thanks to the
reluctance of the U.S. to engage in any negotiations
for total elimination of nuclear weapons from all
national arsenals and it will precipitate an arms race
which can have only one ending: in the unimaginable
horror of WWIII. Einstein warned that any survivors
from that calamity would conduct future conflicts with
sticks and stones.
Without Canada's participation, Fortress America would
remain a Bush dream and yet the Canadian public, in
complete ignorance, is being led along the path of
integration by its politicians, thanks entirely to the
fact that journalists have abdicated their democratic
and moral responsibility to be the eyes and ears of
the people. The wrath of politicians and of the
corporate media owners is a miniscule price to pay to
defend democracy, compared to the perils faced by the
young men of my generation in WW2, tens of thousands
of whom gave their lives in that very cause, in order
to pass Canada's freedom and culture into your
keeping. If you continue to break faith with them by
maintaining editorial silence on this most fundamental
national crisis, thanks to an apparent lack of
intestinal fortitude, please ponder the fact that the
fate to which you are condemning Canadians by your
reluctance to speak out, also awaits your children and
gramdchildren.
It is still not too late to warn Canadians of the
peril they face, but only you have the capacity to do
so. The election is only one week away; please
consider your responsibility most carefully.
W. J. Fisher,
Kingston, Ontario.
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on January 18, 2006]
Comments
view comments in forum
You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.
<br />
Please go to the article and you will better understand why our faith in this election process is being killed. <br />
<br />
=========================================================== <br />
<br />
<br />
Dear Amy Smith. (Herald Reporter) <br />
<br />
The appointment of Ian Thompson as a provincial representative to Ottawa is a major slap in the face to those who will be voting in the Jan 23, 2006 election. I feel it is important to talk about this, because it represents a lack of respect for what some call a democratic process, I was having a very difficult time trying to deceide weather or not to vote, because to things like this appointment give me pause to weather or not my vote really counts, and according to priemier Hamm it does not. <br />
What Mr Hamm has done in my opinion has vetoed our votes and those who we elect here in Nova Scotia to be our and the Provinces elected representative in Ottawa, This does nothing to improve the democratic process and entice our youth to vote. This is a democratic deficit at it worst. <br />
<br />
If Nova Scotia Conservative Premier John Hamm feels that their is a need to have a member of his party sitting in an office in Ottawa, I might suggest he use up one of his back benchers , since they are elected and we already pay them. <br />
<br />
Here is the article written by Herald reporter Amy Smith <br />
<a href="http://www.herald.ns.ca/NovaScotia/478052.html">http://www.herald.ns.ca/NovaScotia/478052.html</a><br />
<br />
Regards<br />
<br />
Wayne Coady<br />
<p>---<br>Good government is not a party government
Lots of stuff there. Also, click on 'FAQ' (top right) then 'Show all" then go down to 'Sovereignty vs Deep Integration '.
---
"If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill
I would appreciate not just a response from them, but also an explanation for this attitude.
It's rather unbelievable what these "Canadian" negotiators are willing to give away to make their American business counterparts happy. What are the American's willing to compromise on ... nothing. To me that means our “negotiators” are fools. And don’t be duped, this has nothing to do with terrorism.
I’m glad that CAP has been talking about this. Bravo!
---
"A Liberal is someone who refuses to take his own side in a fight".
-Robert Frost
One clown even yelled out "liar". If the media doesn't cover it,it does not exist for most people. When the 'leading' candidates know nothing about it, when the people know nothing, and others don't want to know like Mr. Heckler, we are in serious trouble.
The neocons are coming... and our own ignorance is going to make it happen.
---
If there was ever a time for Canadians to become pushy - now is the time - for time is running out on this nation called Canada.
I also get the strong impression that most candidates from the Liberal party have no knowledge about this issue. The reason I pick out the Liberals is because it’s their baby, soon to be passed on to the Conservatives (if they win a majority). I doubt many Conservative backbenchers or voters have heard of this issue either. Both parties will go forward with this though.
I wrote to the NDP some weeks ago suggesting that here is a real difference between the 3 major national parties and that I want to hear them speak up about it. I’m still waiting. I did receive a reply from them detailing their opposition in the past.
Your right, almost nobody knows about this.