“We are deeply offended by people who are coming to Canada, benefiting from all that they have here and that they have lost in their own country ... but are loyal to those who are against Canada and Canadian interests,” he said.
“The Prophet Muhammad said love of your homeland is part of your faith. Loyalty does not mean you can’t disagree or have a different opinion,” said Mahdi.
“But the Holy Koran never gives you the right to disrupt and kill people because you don’t like policy.”
Canada is a country that is built on tolerance and harmony. It’s also a nation that offers virtually limitless opportunity and an unparalleled way of life.
Our tolerance, however, ends at advocating for or taking part in violence.
http://www.ottawasun.com/Comment/Editorial/2006/07/25/1700907.html
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on July 26, 2006]
Note: http://www.ottawasun.co...

---
"Unthinking respect for authority is the greatest enemy of truth."
(Albert Einstein)
---
Brett Mann
Like most things Mr. Tiller is posting lately, it's so full of locical inconsistencies such proof would be truly mindblowing.
---
"I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden
---
"I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden
So essentially what this article is saying is that if you dare defend palestine-as the fellow mentioned in the article does, then you are one of these 'haters' who has no place in Canada. I've got news, contrary to the crazy guy above, virtually every spokeperson for every country has condemned Israel for these atrocities-except of course Canada and the US. Yet even in the states it has been guarded, whereas, well, what else do you expect from Harper?
There is absolutely no reason to be talking about Islam here. The reality is that Canada, like most society's, doesn't tolerate 'hate', meaning threats of violence. That goes as much for other religions as Islam. The closest thing we've had to terrorism has been that very specious account in Toronto.
Contrary to the other post above, we are NOT at war. War has a very specific definition. Even the government doesn't state that, and if war is declared then the government proclaims it. It is not simply a tool you use to justify certain behaviours like making allegations against people of a specific religion and saying 'you better smarten up cuz we're at war here'.
The quote certainly isn't close to racism, just like if an african american says 'you have to do your part for your community' or some such thing, it certainly isn't racist. However, a racist comment can come from a person of that race.
Right. Nethier are their names. Which leads me to suspect they don't exist.
"So essentially what this article is saying is that if you dare defend palestine-as the fellow mentioned in the article does, then you are one of these 'haters' who has no place in Canada."
No, the article states:
“We are deeply offended by people who are coming to Canada, benefiting from all that they have here and that they have lost in their own country ... but are loyal to those who are against Canada and Canadian interests,” he said.
"The Prophet Muhammad said love of your homeland is part of your faith."
It doesnn't mention Palestine, or Isreal even once. It says (to paraphrase) 'Do not come to Canada and bring the troubles of your homeland here. Do not come to Canada with the intention of doing violence in the name of where you have come from.'
Notice the complete lack of Isreal or Palestine being mentioned. It also says:
"Loyalty does not mean you can’t disagree or have a different opinion,"
So if you agree or disagree with policy in Canada, that is your right. But don't resort to violence.
"There is absolutely no reason to be talking about Islam here."
Ummm, Imam . . .mosque . . . Prophet Muhammed . . . Should we be talking Pentecost?
"Contrary to the other post above, we are NOT at war. . . if war is declared then the government proclaims it."
We aren't? We don't have to declare war, for someone to declare war on us. You know, the skinny guy in the white robes? Beard? Friends with Ernie of Sesame Street fame? Ring a bell?
---
"I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden
Bravo
---
We have met the enemy and he is us
Pogo
A mind is a fire to be kindled, not a vessel to be filled.
Plutarch
---
"I think it's important to always carry enough technology to restart civilization, should it be necessary." Mark Tilden
"For starters we’d commend Mahdi’s remarks to Hussein Hammoud, a Lebanese-Canadian who attended a weekend demonstration in Toronto. “We are all with the leader of Hezbollah,” said Hammoud. “God bless him and we are praying for him to defend us and defend our children.”"
That is the only example given in the entire article. Without that, what exactly is being discussed? This is clearly what the article is referring to, its the only example given. His remarks are pretty benign, so apparantly the criticism is that he was at a demonstration and said what he thinks.
I don't know what sesame street or guys in white robes have to do with anything, Gandalf perhaps? In reality, war has a definition. In order for it to be a war it has to be declared. Otherwise you are just making up definitions yourself. That's fine if you want to do that, but it means its impossible for somebody to debate you because your simply making up words as you go along. We don't even have troops in that area of the middle east, so to assume we are part of a war there is absurd. Even in Afghanistan and Haiti we are part of a UN security team engaged in peacekeeping. Go read your history, when Canada is at war, you'll know it!
The claim that the palestinian victims 'do not exist', is simply a tool used to silence criticism. Who's to say the Israeli soldier exists? Who's to say Israel even exists? Just because somebody says a name? In fact history shows Israel is far more likely to be making up their reasons for attack, because they have a well documented history of it. In virtually every case of aggression Israel blows up an apartment or van, then waits for Palestine to retaliate. The western media almost never reports on the initial attack, but focuses on the retaliation.
That makes for the very strange case where the country with nuclear weapons, far more advanced military weapons, a larger air force than Canada and every country in the area put together, pitted against an opponent which literally in many cases defends itself with rocks, and its presents itself as the 'victim'. Of course every empire does that, the US was telling people angry Nicaraguans were going to come storming across the border if they didn't wipe them out, the same for Germany and Poland.
The only real odd thing about it is its success.
---
We have met the enemy and he is us
Pogo
A mind is a fire to be kindled, not a vessel to be filled.
Plutarch
---
Brett Mann
Multiculturalism is one thing, but these zionists are hate mongers, and it is time we recognized them for what they are - nazis.
---
“The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous, the essential act of warfare is the destruction of the produce of human labour”
What 'insane urge to nuke Israel'? I think they'd prefer 'death by swarming of ten million arabs armed with clubs', myself. Would last longer and cause more pain. To the entire arab world, the zionists are on equal terms with the nazis. They are doing the exact same thing as nazi germany did to it's jewish population. Only this time the world is letting them. If I were a young muslim man living in Gaza, I would probably have already endured 100 searches, 20 beatings, 1 arrest and torture, and 1 'watch my family member shot dead' by now. Damn rights I'd be on the boat for the destruction of Israel. I'd avoid the strap-on explosive girdle, though.
Perhaps if the US hadn't allowed Israel to develop nukes, giving them a green light even though they are a religious fundamentalist militarist regime (please do NOT consider them democratic. Democratic countries do not restrict certain racial groups from running for positions in government)
Hell, if I was Iran, I'd be developing nukes as fast as I could, it's perhaps the only insurance against invasion. Mutually Assured Destruction is M.A.D., but it works.
---
“The war is not meant to be won, it is meant to be continuous, the essential act of warfare is the destruction of the produce of human labour”