Sir John Ralston Saul Has Got It Backward

Posted on Tuesday, June 28 at 12:34 by gaulois
"L’expérience acquise pour le maintien de la langue française en milieu minoritaire doit maintenant servir pour la survie des nombreuses langues autochtones qui sont présentement en péril. Les francophones et francophiles hors Québec se doivent de soutenir les autochtones dans leur démarche. C’est un lien naturel"
As far as I know, the First Nations are the ones gaining increased sovereignties, gaining confidence, becoming a majority group in Saskatchewan while FHQs are now at "minuit moins cinq" in that province and FHQs are disappearing from the map in Western Canada under assimilation pressure. FHQs should really be the ones following their path and asking for their guidance. Perhaps Saul would much rather have the First Nations fully assimilated???

A letter of apology has been requested.

Note: told a bunch of francos

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue Jun 28, 2005 10:37 pm
    Gaulois, I have to disagree with you on this one. Saul has never advocated assimililation of native cultures.

    In fact, he has been a tireless supporter of First Nations. If you read any of his books, but especially Reflections on a Siamese Twin or On Equilibrium you can see he continually makes the point that First Nation culture is fundamental to Canada.

    Saul sees FHQ as flourishing. You see FHQ under seige. You may disagree on this point, but it is jump to say therefore Saul advocates assimilation of natives, when he clearly does not.

    If you believe Saul has made a mistake, I suggest you engage him about what the true situtation of FHQ may be. I'm sure he would welcome the opportunity to learn.

    ---
    If you don't like these ideas, I've got others. --Marshall McLuhan

  2. Wed Jun 29, 2005 4:04 am
    My last line was obviously rather punchy and I did not mean to suggest that he intentionally meant harm. A person in his position should however be extremely careful to make these kinds of statements if he does not know about the case of the FHQs. He certainly has the intellect and all the contacts to understand it. I certainly hope that he will be looking further into this and perhaps be more helpful next time around. Suggesting the FHQs as an example to the First Nations was plain irresponsible and I do believe that he should apologize for having done so. I have BTW invited him to publish on Le Canard before and be supportive of NGO initiatives.


    ---
    "We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"

  3. Sun Aug 07, 2005 7:57 pm
    FHQ's are under siege. That's not an opinion, that's a fact. But FHQ's are also irrelevant... if they want to remain francophones, let them go to the only francophone homeland in North America - Quebec.

    As for natives and their problems, I have no opinion except to underline the fact that one of the most problematic "native" groups in Canada is a fraud. That is the Mohawk community, which entered Canada as immigrants with the British after 1759. They're less "native" to Canada than the Quebecois are, and ought to be shipped back to New York state where they belong.

  4. Mon Aug 08, 2005 1:50 am
    Trying to wear a majority hat for a moment, FHQs are relevant to the majority the same way the coal mine canary is. If the FHQs go as they are now, the majority should really wonder who is next?

    ---
    "We are all in this together somehow, some more than others somehow"



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news