The Canadian Chamber of Commerce plans a big push with all political parties because of the economic fallout, president Nancy Hughes Anthony said Friday.
"Some of our members equated it to the Avro Arrow decision, where they could see a brain drain that went south of the border with respect to engineers and people in the aerospace industry," she said.
"Certainly many of our members who are in the defence and aerospace industry and high tech . . . are very concerned that even Canadian subsidiaries in American companies will not be eligible to participate."
The Avro Arrow was an advanced supersonic jet built in Canada during the Cold War years. Nearly 14,000 people lost jobs at the Avro plant in Malton, Ont., when then-prime minister John Diefenbaker cancelled the program in 1959.
Prime Minister Paul Martin announced late last month that Canada wouldn't participate in the multibillion-dollar missile defence plan proposed by President George W. Bush.
"It's another irritant that's very hard for the American side to understand," said Hughes Anthony, who met with State Department officials and U.S. business leaders.
Another quote from article:
Hughes Anthony, who addressed an Energy Council gathering of executives and politicians, told them: "I hope we will be able to work with our government on that decision."
She also assured them that Canadian business leaders reject any notion of limiting energy supplies to the United States out of frustration over trade issues.
But she acknowledged that many in Canada are particularly upset their victories in softwood legal battles at a NAFTA panel and the World Trade Organization haven't made a dent in U.S. policy on punishing penalties on Canadian products.
"There are some in our country who suggest that U.S. interest in our energy resources must be accompanied by a greater U.S. willingness to live up to its trade obligations under NAFTA and the WTO."
Also:
Mel Knight, a member of the Alberta legislature, said that province will remain a secure energy supplier to the United States, no matter what difficulties exist in the relationship.
Read full article:
http://www.mytelus.com/news/article.do?pageID=news_home&articleID=1869858
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on March 13, 2005]
You could only make such a comparison if we already had a functioning BMD system, the best in the world capable of intercepting even American varieties, and then decided to cancel it, scrap every piece of the project down to the last shop jig, send all the engineers south and spend the money all over again buying into the U.S. version which had yet to pass a successful test.
The BMD is 100 % useless.They are selling a fantasy.The Chinese and Russians already know how to overcome this system as does anyone else who wants to attack the US with nukes.An 8 year old could figure this out.If the US is so great why don`t
these business people go there?They can have there stupid BMD.
http://directdemocracycanada.ca
---
The midget, Bush, and that Rumsfield deserve only to be beaten with shoes by freedom loving people everywhere.
- Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, The Iraqi Informat
Same reason I abhor wars.
Nancy Hughes Anthony is just the corporate windbag and the aerospace industry (how much of it is really Canadian?), are the ones that were royally pissed off that they would lose their USA luster because Canada wouldn't go and murder the Iraqi people for the sake of their businesses.
Nancy Hughes Anthony should get email after email telling her she is not going to get away with it and neither are the amoral assholes that steer her ship.
---
"Yeah, well, [Mr. President] we used all five fingers because that's the way our mittens are made." Antonia Zerbisias
Clue in Coulter.
"Many of the member companies of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, including those in the information technology, aerospace, engineering and defense industries, expressed serious concerns over the long-term negative impact on the Canadian economy from the government's decision to stay out of BMD."<br />
<br />
Self serving or what?