Canadian Business To Fight BMD Decision

Posted on Saturday, March 12 at 12:36 by whelan costen
The Canadian Chamber of Commerce plans a big push with all political parties because of the economic fallout, president Nancy Hughes Anthony said Friday. "Some of our members equated it to the Avro Arrow decision, where they could see a brain drain that went south of the border with respect to engineers and people in the aerospace industry," she said. "Certainly many of our members who are in the defence and aerospace industry and high tech . . . are very concerned that even Canadian subsidiaries in American companies will not be eligible to participate." The Avro Arrow was an advanced supersonic jet built in Canada during the Cold War years. Nearly 14,000 people lost jobs at the Avro plant in Malton, Ont., when then-prime minister John Diefenbaker cancelled the program in 1959. Prime Minister Paul Martin announced late last month that Canada wouldn't participate in the multibillion-dollar missile defence plan proposed by President George W. Bush. "It's another irritant that's very hard for the American side to understand," said Hughes Anthony, who met with State Department officials and U.S. business leaders. Another quote from article: Hughes Anthony, who addressed an Energy Council gathering of executives and politicians, told them: "I hope we will be able to work with our government on that decision." She also assured them that Canadian business leaders reject any notion of limiting energy supplies to the United States out of frustration over trade issues. But she acknowledged that many in Canada are particularly upset their victories in softwood legal battles at a NAFTA panel and the World Trade Organization haven't made a dent in U.S. policy on punishing penalties on Canadian products. "There are some in our country who suggest that U.S. interest in our energy resources must be accompanied by a greater U.S. willingness to live up to its trade obligations under NAFTA and the WTO." Also: Mel Knight, a member of the Alberta legislature, said that province will remain a secure energy supplier to the United States, no matter what difficulties exist in the relationship. Read full article: http://www.mytelus.com/news/article.do?pageID=news_home&articleID=1869858 [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on March 13, 2005]

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sat Mar 12, 2005 9:06 pm
    Comparing BMD to the Arrow is the most cynical thing I have ever heard!

    You could only make such a comparison if we already had a functioning BMD system, the best in the world capable of intercepting even American varieties, and then decided to cancel it, scrap every piece of the project down to the last shop jig, send all the engineers south and spend the money all over again buying into the U.S. version which had yet to pass a successful test.

  2. Sat Mar 12, 2005 9:09 pm
    And Canada would make the decision under pressure from the U.S., which would threaten to locate BMD sites in areas that would ensure fallout into highly populated areas of Canada in the event of an attack.

  3. Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:23 pm
    This is so embarrassing! Don't these people get cognitive dissonance when they spout this crap and have a Canadian passport in their back pocket. Maybe the other pocket has a green card. I don't recognize my country anymore.

  4. Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:28 pm
    The business flunkies are once again subverting the democratic process.The people said no.That means NO!
    The BMD is 100 % useless.They are selling a fantasy.The Chinese and Russians already know how to overcome this system as does anyone else who wants to attack the US with nukes.An 8 year old could figure this out.If the US is so great why don`t
    these business people go there?They can have there stupid BMD.

  5. Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:39 pm
    I'm sure these are the same eager beaver businessmen who were were all gung-ho to send Canadian kids (not their own, of course) off to die in Iraq so as not to threaten our (their) strong economic relationship with our southern cousins. <blockquote>"It's another irritant that's very hard for the American side to understand," </blockquote> What, making our own decisions is an 'irritant'?<br><br> I love this particular quote, which I've seen in various forms elsewhere, because it implies everyone in the US is surprised and appalled/puzzled by the Canadian decision in this matter. A substantial number of US citizens seem a bit dubious, if not outright opposed, to the scheme. So if a US government, which is in fact the 'side' referenced, that is not viewed with confidence by most Canadians is 'irritated' by another nation not falling into line with every whacked out scheme they devise, well too bad, so sad.<p>---<br>"When we are in the middle of the paradigm, it is hard to imagine any other paradigm" (Adam Smith).<br />
    http://directdemocracycanada.ca

  6. Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:42 pm
    Green card in my back pocket. If only. San Diego here I come.

  7. Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:43 pm
    U.S. owned branch plants will always be allowed to do business with the U.S...nice try.

    ---
    The midget, Bush, and that Rumsfield deserve only to be beaten with shoes by freedom loving people everywhere.

    - Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, The Iraqi Informat

  8. Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:46 pm
    We would love to go there but you don't seem to understand how difficult it is to obtain the blessed green card. The categories are very limited. There are millions of Canadians living in US but they immigrated there in times when entry was not so limited. So....to say why not move there is not a viable option. Many do try.

  9. Sat Mar 12, 2005 10:53 pm
    We are totally integrated with US and will continue to do so. Our future is with the US and most of us have no problem with that. Get used to it. This site is interesting but somehow I can't help but think that most of the folks here are mostly misfits (me included). Normal folks are probably enjoying their families, friends or doing interesting things not raging on about a done deal.

  10. Sat Mar 12, 2005 11:10 pm
    I don't mind you wanting to leave, I respect that. I DO mind if you try to mess up my country while you're waiting.

  11. Sat Mar 12, 2005 11:16 pm
    I for one have very little interest in space programs and the huge dollars that are spent there when people are going without food and medicine on the planet. It's just one of my priority idiosyncracys.

    Same reason I abhor wars.

    Nancy Hughes Anthony is just the corporate windbag and the aerospace industry (how much of it is really Canadian?), are the ones that were royally pissed off that they would lose their USA luster because Canada wouldn't go and murder the Iraqi people for the sake of their businesses.

    Nancy Hughes Anthony should get email after email telling her she is not going to get away with it and neither are the amoral assholes that steer her ship.

    ---
    "Yeah, well, [Mr. President] we used all five fingers because that's the way our mittens are made." Antonia Zerbisias

  12. Sat Mar 12, 2005 11:20 pm
    "most of us" - straight out of bizarro land. You are not the majority meathead. Thats why your party is second, that is why missile defence was defeated and that is why 70% said they dislike being more like america.

    Clue in Coulter.

  13. Sat Mar 12, 2005 11:23 pm
    <a href="http://www.canadiandemocraticmovement.ca/displayarticle602.html">http://www.canadiandemocraticmovement.ca/displayarticle602.html</a><br />
    "Many of the member companies of the Canadian Chamber of Commerce, including those in the information technology, aerospace, engineering and defense industries, expressed serious concerns over the long-term negative impact on the Canadian economy from the government's decision to stay out of BMD."<br />
    <br />
    Self serving or what?

  14. Sat Mar 12, 2005 11:25 pm
    You appear to speak for "most" Canadians. If that were true we would be in Iraq and BMD. Were not, so I respectfully doubt your truisms.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news