To defeat international terrorism today, governments of the world, led by the United States and Russia, must undertake a no-holds-barred assault on the underground economy of illegal drugs and weapons—what EIR first labeled "Dope, Inc." back in 1979. The black market in guns and drugs is the "Achilles' heel" of the modern irregular warfare apparatus. Take out that infrastructure, and the capacity of this network to conduct their warfare is destabilized, decisively.
This means, above all else, that the "Grasso Factor" can no longer be tolerated, if the world is to survive the drive for a global "clash of civilizations" aimed at spreading war and chaos across the entire Eurasian land-mass. The "Grasso Factor" refers to the infamous visit that the Chairman of the New York Stock Exchange, Richard Grasso, paid to the Colombian jungles, in June 1999, where he embraced a top leader of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), Raúl Reyes, and pronounced one of the world's leading narco-terrorists "a man Wall Street can do business with."
Since the Grasso visit, new damning evidence has surfaced about the FARC's far-flung drug operations, including a multibillion-dollar-a-year guns-for-drugs alliance with the Mexican Arellano Félix drug cartel, the biggest and most murderous drug gang in that country.
It is now an open secret that the major Wall Street and City of London commercial banks launder hundreds of billions of dollars in illegal drug money every year as a matter of policy. U.S. intelligence officials privately acknowledge that all of the major New York commercial banks have emissaries in Colombia, Peru, Paraguay, and the other targets of Dope, Inc., soliciting the narco-traffickers' business. There is a fierce competition for narco-dollars—one of the biggest sources of cash flow in the world today, at a moment when the global financial system is on the verge of total collapse.
The pace at which the global financial and irregular warfare crises are unfolding, did not permit the EIR team to undertake the same painstaking study of the present world illegal drug trade that we conducted in 1996. However, EIR editors have reviewed some of the critical data, and have interviewed senior anti-drug officials from the United States and several Ibero-American nations. The report that follows represents a highly accurate summary profile of the status of Dope, Inc. at the dawn of the new millennium.
A Paradox
The 1996 EIR study concluded that Dope, Inc. had grown to a $521 billion a year illegal business—nearly doubling from the $259 billion annual revenue of 1985. The recent EIR review of U.S. government data, including the "National Drug Threat Assessment 2001" report, produced in October 2000 by the National Drug Intelligence Center (NDIC), confirms that Dope, Inc. now represents an annual cash flow of well over $600 billion. This is an extremely conservative estimate. More precise figures, which we are not prepared to state at this time, are likely significantly higher.
At the same time, it is important to report a significant, seemingly paradoxical phenomenon. According to the March 2000 "International Narcotics Control Strategy Report," the annual State Department study of the world underground narcotics economy, both opium and coca production declined during 1995-99. The declines were very specific: Bolivia and Peru carried out intensive campaigns to eradicate coca production. Over that five-year period, Bolivian coca production fell by a staggering 71%, and Peru, under the Presidency of Alberto Fujimori, cut coca production by 62%.
During the same time frame, as the FARC was supplanting the Medellín and Cali cartels as the country's leading cocaine-trafficking organization, Colombia's coca production shot up by 126%. Colombia also emerged as an opium-producing and heroin-processing country, which now provides a substantial portion of the high-grade heroin sold on the streets of North America. Colombian anti-narcotics officials who recently visited Washington reported, during a behind-closed-doors briefing, that the opium fields and heroin laboratories were established in Colombia, with the assistance of Afghani and Pakistani agricultural specialists and chemists, leading to suspicions about a possible narco-link between the FARC and Afghani and Pakistani drug lords, who, after 1996, had worked out a drug tax-for-protection arrangement with the Taliban.
Afghan opium production increased between 1995 and 1999 by 34%, but at the same time, the government of Myanmar launched a successful crackdown against opium growers, reducing output by 53%.
What is the significance of these opposing trends over the past half-decade? While overall drug production has been on the rise, countries that showed a determination to crack down on the production of cocaine and opium were not only successful, but their efforts reduced global production figures for cocaine and opium by 18% and 26%, respectively, from 1995 to 1999.
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2001/2848dope_money.html
[Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on March 28, 2007]
Note: http://www.larouchepub....
and the writer is by Jeffrey Steinberg
There is Government involvment in the drug trade
investigate further and find it to be so.
Gary Allen (None Dare Call it Conspiracy) was a Birtcher
Kill the messenger
---
"And God said: 'Let there be Satan, so people don't blame everything on me. And let there be lawyers, so people don't blame everything on Satan."
* George Bu
<a href="http://www.public-integrity.org/articles/publications1.htm">http://www.public-integrity.org/articles/publications1.htm</a><br />
<br />
"In a little noticed, but truly revealing statement last month, the FARC announced that it was going to enforce its General Law No. 2, taxing the rich. However, the FARC refused to disclose its Law No. 1, which they promise to reveal only when they are in power. Clearly, being in power is not beyond their reach, considering that they control about 50% of the country, and that they have a distinct presence at the outskirts of Bogota. And from what we know of the FARC by now, it is reasonable to assume that when, or if they do, their system of government will be totalitarian, nothing they care to advertise in advance for fear of loosing popular support. Perhaps as a condition for Pastrana's next negotiation with them, he should demand that they make public their Law No. 1. <br />
<br />
Illegal drugs provide the Narco-Terrorists with revenue of about $750 million to $1 billion annually in Colombia alone. Not surprisingly they deny their involvement in the drug trade. But it is surprising that Colombian Pres. Andres Pastrana supports their claim, stating that "there is no evidence that the FARC are drug traffickers" in an interview last year to the Argentine newspaper 'Clarin'. On the contrary says Pastrana, "The FARC have always said they are interested in eradicating illegal crops." And US Drug Czar Barry McCaffrey, though noting the linkage between the drug traffickers and the guerrillas, claims that only "two thirds [of the terrorists] benefit financially from this association." <br />
<br />
Why these outrageous statements that fly in the face of evidence and common sense? In whose interest is this fiction advanced? Why keep alive the myth that there is a distinction between the terrorists and the drug traffickers in Colombia? Why provide them with respectability and legitimacy by maintaining the fiction that these greedy criminals have a "social and political agenda"? Does anyone really think that by turning a blind eye to their narcotics involvement, we will "socialize" them and bring them into the democratic political arena? <br />
<br />
Many acknowledge that US foreign policy in Latin America has often failed. The post-Cold War era dictates Washington must above all else maintain the appearance of not meddling in other countries' internal affairs, domestic terrorism included. At least, that will be the policy until some unpredictable cataclysmic crisis forces Washington to grapple with the on-going destruction of civil society by criminal organizations in a country as important as Colombia. <br />
<br />
That may be coming sooner rather than later. According to the General Accounting Office (GAO) reports, the Marxist Revolutionary Armed Forces (FARC) and the National Liberation Army (ELN), Colombia's two Narco-terrorist guerrilla organizations are responsible for the country's heroin and cocaine expanding production. The GAO projects that Colombian heroin, already the primary source for the eastern US, will rise by as much as 50% in the next two years. And the 165 tons of cocaine, which ended up on the streets of America in 1998, will swell to at least 250 tons by the year 2001." <br />
<br />
<p>---<br>"And God said: 'Let there be Satan, so people don't blame everything on me. And let there be lawyers, so people don't blame everything on Satan."<br />
<br />
* George Bu
1. Colombia is hardly a democracy, let alone "the oldest democracy". Colombia has been in a state of internal warfare since 1948 and over 250,000 people have died. 2. It already is a Narco-cracy and it is the Colombian ruling class that is behind it.. I am going to check the organization that wrote this and find out who they are.
Thanks for the input
---
"And God said: 'Let there be Satan, so people don't blame everything on me. And let there be lawyers, so people don't blame everything on Satan."
* George Bu