We'll Close! Plant Closings, Plant-Closing Threats, Union Organizing And NAFTA

Posted on Wednesday, November 12 at 11:00 by N Say
These overall percentages actually underestimate the extent employers use plant-closing threats, since they include industries and sectors of the economy where threats to shut down and move facilities are much less likely and carry less weight because the industry or product is less mobile. In mobile industries such as manufacturing, transportation and warehouse/distribution, the percentage of campaigns with plant-closing threats is 62 percent, compared to only 36 percent in relatively immobile industries such as construction, health care, education, retail and other services. Where employers can credibly threaten to shut down or move their operations in response to union activity, they do so in large numbers.

Moving to Mexico and other threats

Plant-closing threats come in a variety of guises. Veiled and verbal threats are the most common, which is not surprising given that direct unambiguous threats to close the plant in response to union organizing activity are clearly in violation of the law. From 1993 to 1995, approximately 40 percent of employers made veiled verbal threats in both elections and withdrawals. Fifteen percent of the employers in the withdrawals and 22 percent of the employers in the election campaigns made specific unambiguous verbal threats. At least 13 percent of the employers made veiled written threats in both elections and withdrawals. Six percent of the employers in the withdrawals and 10 percent of the employers in the elections made specific unambiguous written threats.

....

The threats continue

Employer opposition to unions does not stop after a union wins a recognition election. In the 174 instances from 1993 to 1995 where the union either won the election or won voluntary recognition, only 57 percent had won a first contract by September 1996.

etc etc
here's the whole thing:
http://www.multinationalmonitor.org/hyper/mm0397.04.html

Note: http://www.multinationa...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Thu Nov 13, 2003 12:40 am
    If a plant closes, it obviously moves to a place like Mexico, or some other 3rd world country, where wages are pitiful, and labour,safety, and environmental laws are draconian. If by chance the plant did not close due to their government aided threats, the workers have taken a beating in wages and contract language. The money saved from either result?- Easy. It goes right into the pockets of the CEO`s and the Board of Directors, who are the majority shareholders. Very rarely do we see many plants in Canada use extra revenue derived from oppressive policies go into new machinery or technology. The goal now is: profits QUICKLY AND CHEAPLY AS POSSIBLE! If these corporations can get away with paying us 5 dollars a day, and make us work 8 days a week, THEY SURELY WILL!

    ---
    Dave Ruston



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news