Syria Is A Convenient Fall Guy For Gemayel’S Death

Posted on Thursday, November 23 at 14:44 by Mike_VC
As anyone who watches TV crimes series knows, when there is insufficient physical evidence in a murder investigation for a conviction, detectives examine the motives of the parties who stood to benefit from the crime. Better detectives also consider whether the prime suspect -- the person who looks at first sight to be the guilt party -- is not, in fact, being turned into a fallguy by one of the other parties. The murderer may be the person who benefits most clearly from the crime, or the murderer may be the person who benefits from the prime suspect being fingered for the murder. As most of our politicians and the media’s commentators have deduced, suspicion falls automatically on Syria because the Christian Phalangists are one of Syria’s main enemies in Lebanon. Partly as a result, they have opposed recent attempts by Syria’s main ally in Lebanon, the Shiite group Hizbullah, to win a greater share of political power. They are also -- and this seems to clinch it for most observers -- part of the majority in the pro-American government of Fuad Siniora that supports a United Nations tribunal to try the killers of Rafik Hariri, an anti-Syria politician and leader of the Sunni Muslim community, who was blown up by a car bomb more than a year and a half ago. After all six Shiite ministers walked out of the Siniora cabinet two weeks ago, and now with Gemayel’s assassination, the government is close to collapse, and with it the tribunal that everyone expects to implicate Syria in Hariri’s murder. If Syria can “bump off” another two cabinet ministers and the government loses its quorum, Syria will be off the hook -- or so runs the logic of Western observers. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=COO20061123&articleId=3957 [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on November 24, 2006]

Note: http://www.globalresear...

Contributed By


Topic


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Fri Nov 24, 2006 4:26 pm
    "In truth, Israel will benefit in numerous ways from the tensions provoked by the assassination, as the popular and angry rallies in Beirut against Syria and Hizbullah are proving."

    CBC's "The Current" did an interview with 3 different guests on this subject and *not once* was Israel mentioned in any context during the entire discussion despite the fact that it just finished commiting war crimes in that country and tried to take it over.

  2. Fri Nov 24, 2006 6:06 pm
    I missed that interview, but the fact that Israel wasn’t mentioned doesn’t surprise me. Hunter S. Thompson once said something to the effect that if one takes most political news stories and believe precisely the opposite, you’ll be much closer to the truth. (I’m paraphrasing here but you get the idea)

  3. Fri Nov 24, 2006 10:51 pm
    In order to not mention Israel, fresh in our collective minds what it had just done to Lebanon and how it possibly stood to gain from the assassination, the 3 guests and the CBC interviewer who were involved in the discussion had to specifically and knowingly choose to not mention Israel as a possible suspect. The CBC interviewer should have at least asked the question, since it was such an obvious question to ask. I listened to the whole thing, waiting for the question to be raised, but it never happened. The 4 people were behaving as if Israel was not even remotely involved in Lebanese politics, which of course it is in a major way. <br><br> I've noted a past CBC debate with 2 quests concerning the question if criticizing Israel was anti-semitism or not. After listening to the guests apologise for Israel over and over, both seemingly in complete agreement, I was left wondering what the two supposedly opposing guests were actually arguing over. All I could get from it, was that they were debating the semantics of specific words while not debating at all. The whole thing was a complete waste of time listening to and I almost fell asleep. <br><br> Now I'm sure that the head of the CBC, one <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Rabinovitch">Robert Rabinovitch</a> who was once <strong>Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Canadian Jewish Congress (Québec)</strong>, has nothing to do with the CBC's current bias in favor of Israel. <br><br>

  4. Fri Nov 24, 2006 11:22 pm
    Yes, debates on this subject can certainly turn surrealistic. It seems that both conscious, unconscious and the prevailing accepted social attitudes can turn just about any debate about Israel into a bunch of meaningless noise. I could go on but it’s time to go for a beer.

    Have a good weekend.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news