The Farm Crisis & Corporate Profits

Posted on Wednesday, March 08 at 13:30 by Rural
Compared to our family farms, the profit picture for the other links in the chain could not be more different. For the agribusiness corporations dominant in Canada, 2004 was the best year in history; overall, profits hit record highs. Of the 75 companies profiled in the following pages and for which profit data is available, 41 posted record profits, and another 16 had near-record profits or their second- or third-best year ever. Thus, 57 of 75 companies - 76% - had their best year, or nearly their best………………………………………………… Corporations continue to expand into new areas of the farm input business - colonizing new biological and economic terrain—creating “inputs” where none existed before. Their most recent foray is into the area of seeds. Until recently, farmers were largely self-sufficient in seeds for most crops - they saved and re-used part of their harvest (corn and canola are exceptions). The new varieties farmers needed were provided by publicly funded breeding. As recently as the mid-1980s, the public sector still accounted for over 95% of plant breeding in Canada, and 100% of cereal and oilseed breeding.8 The past two decades, however, have seen the rise of global seed corporations and the decimation of public seed development. Seeds have become big business………………………………… The dominant agri-business corporations work to destroy cooperatives and farmers’ collective-marketing agencies. Such destruction yields corporations a triple benefit: . Allowing them to capture profits previously returned to farmers through co-ops and marketing boards; . Reducing farmers’ market power by destroying collective-marketing agencies (this reduction in market power further enhances corporate profits because reduced market power leads to reduced farmgate prices); and . Destroying the functioning counter-models to corporate-dominated, profit-extracting agribusiness. In the late-1990s, co-operatives processed 2/3 of Canadian milk; today, co-ops process 42%.11 In the early-1990s, nearly all Western grain moved through farmer-owned and -controlled elevator cooperatives. Those co-ops are gone: bankrupted, privatized, or bought up by the dominant grain companies. Until recently, Ontario farmers marketed all their wheat through an agency they controlled: that collective marketing agency, the Ontario Wheat Producers Marketing Board, is gone. Until recently, Prairie farmers marketed their hogs through provincial marketing boards: those boards are gone - destroyed largely to appease the biggest packers and corporate hog producers……………………………………………………. Farmers’ relative returns There is no need to make again the point that farmers are suffering while others prosper. But it is illuminating to see just how lush corporate profits are when compared to those of farmers. One way to highlight this disparity is to ask the question: What would our farms and rural areas look like if the profits within the agri-food chain were allocated more equitably? What if farmers’ Return on Equity (ROE) rates approached those enjoyed by agribusiness?................................................ Full article at http://www.freewebs.com/westernclarion/corporate_profits.html For more farm crisis reports google the following • The Honourable Wayne Easter, Parliamentary Secretary to the former Minister of Agriculture and Agri-Food in the Liberal government produced “Empowering Canadian Farmers in the Marketplace” last July. • The National Farmers Union wrote “The Farm Crisis: Its Causes and Solutions,” also last July. • The Agriculture Institute of Canada commissioned a discussion paper, “Big Farms, Small Farms: Strategies in Sustainable Agriculture to fit All Sizes,” last September. • The Canadian Federation of Agriculture wrote “Agricultural Policy Framework II: A Canadian Farm Bill” last November. [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on March 10, 2006]

Note: http://www.freewebs.com...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Thu Mar 09, 2006 1:43 am
    It's scary where all of this is headed, yet, the general public doesn't seem to be aware of how damaging it is.

    Not only seeds either. Every type of farming is threatened. I had posted an article in the forum (can't find it now) under the title "Canada stands alone at wto" In it, Australia wants us to stop producing our own dairy products and allow them to supply it to us! Unbelievable...

    ---
    These days, if you are not confused, you are not thinking clearly. Mrs. Irene Peters

  2. by Deacon
    Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:11 am
    Unfreakinbelievable...

  3. Thu Mar 09, 2006 6:04 pm
    This is proof of my long held contention that so called "free enterprise market capitalism" is just another form of forced collectivization. The example of wealth taking from others, the ecology and the future.

    One of the main thrusts of the neoclassical theory, that many so called economists openly admit, is to depopulate the countryside, hand all forms of resource extraction and food production over to a handful of companies and force people into cities, where they have to rely on the buying of everything, in other words, on handouts from the corporate dictators. 80% of Canadians are now living in cities, totally at the mercy of a few corporations and harebrained theories that can and will collapse at any time.

    This has been and is going on all over Canada and the world under the fraudulent definition of economic efficiency, which in their terminology is "The biggest profits for the least monetary inputs". Which means the destruction of physically efficient economic systems for short term benefits for a self appointed ruling class. Nothing more, or less than another form of the Soviet Politbureau system, even if it is falsely called "free enterprise" .

    The deregulation of the banks resulted in the gross inflation of the money supply, which permits the enforcement of collectivization through overcapitalization with imaginary capital.

    The family farm is the most efficient and sustainable food production system, with thousands of years of experience in some parts of the world, whereas the corporate agribiz operations are literally mining and destroying the land with monocropping, demanding the use of ever increasing amounts of chemicals.

    If the public is willing to tolerate this under the fraudulent claim of "cheap foods", they're cutting their own and their children's throats. There are no cheap foods, and no cheap anything. The costs are always the same, but are diverted onto other sectors and the future

    I have been working on Green Revolution corporate farms and for the last 27 years with organics, so I do have a certain amount of experience in the matter .

    Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.

  4. by Rural
    Thu Mar 09, 2006 8:49 pm
    Thanks for your insight Ed, always good to get a perspective from someone who is one of those “farmers”. How do you deal with the decrease in the difference between inputs and outputs in your operation?
    What surprised me when I first read this (and moved me to post it) was firstly that a farm “organization”, in this case the N.F.U.. had recognized that subsidies, grants and support programs were not going to solve the problem and in fact had little long term impact.
    The only way to stop this degradation of our family farms and our ability to maintain our independence from foreign corporations is for our farmers (like any other viable business) to receive a reasonable return on their investment and labor. This means the ability to control their input costs and receive a fair price for their products, as pointed out by this report that can only happen with MORE competition (not less, as happens daily with corporate take-overs) in the processing and distribution part of the “agri business” food chain.
    The report particularly points out the loss of marketing cooperatives as being one of the areas where farmers are left with reduced options for the sale of their product, this is, it would seem, where our governments could easily start to turn things around. Let them put in place funding for farmers to form small cooperatives and then change the sometimes ridiculous regulations that make it all but impossible for smaller enterprises to sell direct to the consumer, independent processor (are there any?) or to their local food stores. Unfortunately there are few, if any, independent grocery stores / chains left so that the latter option is already becoming “not acceptable” by their corporate owners.
    A few of our “leaders” need to spend a few 14 to 16 hour days out in the fields this spring and then be told that they have just spent the last few weeks working for less than minimum wage and in fact may well owe the farmer money for the privilege of helping him work the land. Or maybe do the chores in a hog barn 7 days a week for a few months only to see a return on the sale of the offspring limited to near the cost of feeding and housing them, only then will they understand that the balance between the profits of the farmers and the profits of the processors / distributors need to be totally reversed.



    ---
    When you are up to your ass in alligators it is difficult to remember that the initial objective was to drain the swamp

  5. Fri Mar 10, 2006 12:08 am
    We're subsidizing our farming operation from our pensions now and used to do it from other, outside incomes. A huge number of farmers, some with large holdings, are doing this as a matter of conscience and because they want to maintain their relatively free lifestyles, and self sufficiency. As we do.

    We have ranchers in this area, who own large tracts of land, worth millions, hundreds of cattle, yet they live under virtual poverty levels.

    The reason is that the present market economic theory and bank deregulation is subsidizing big business to control the markets and decide who is going to survive and who not ? We're completely at their mercy and get what they throw at us for our animals, while they make huge profits. Like, during the BSE crisis, when we had to give away our cattle for a few dollars, yet supermarket prices were up and rising. They have bought beef for .2, .3 cents a
    pound and sold it for $5. or $6. This is called "wealth creating free enterprise".

    If this is not a centrally planned economy I would like to know what the hell it is ?

    There are many forms of subsidies, virtually anything we do, sell, or pay for is some kind of a subsidy to somebody, or to some sector. This is not mentioned in the texbooks, where only anti government propaganda exists to mislead people into the support of aristocracy creating theories as good economics.

    Free trade, which is the death knell for many industries is the biggest subsidy of them all, yet it is sold by propagandists as "free enterprise", or as some people on this forum call it, and themselves, "individualism".

    I'm not going into the solutions, but as the present system has been set up and promoted, while destituting and killing millions, so could some other that would enhance human life and the ecology.

    Since the beginning of history, farmers have been looked down on as "peasants", "hayseed", stupid serfs enslaved by aristocracies and this is only a new manifestation of the same theories and ideology.

    Ed Deak.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.



Latest Editorials

more articles »

Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news