Mountie Wants To Share Arar Info Kept Secret For "National Security"

Posted on Tuesday, June 14 at 12:53 by sthompson
[snip]...Barbara McIsaac, the Justice Department's lead lawyer at the inquiry, poured cold water on the effort to lift national security claims over Supt. Cabana's testimony. "We have to find a way to work around this," she said. National security claims rest on two principles, she said: Preserving continuing police investigations, and ensuring that revelations don't put Canada's relations with other countries at risk. Likewise, commission lead counsel Paul Cavalluzzo was cool to the idea. "I think the most important point to remember is that Mr. Cabana has told his whole story in camera to Justice O'Connor," Mr. Cavalluzzo said, referring to Mr. Justice Dennis O'Connor, who is heading the inquiry. Both Ms. McIsaac and Mr. Cavalluzzo already know Supt. Cabana's full story, because they participated in closed hearings that took place during the past year. Lorne Waldman, Mr. Arar's lawyer, was not allowed to participate, as neither he nor Mr. Arar himself have the necessary security clearance. Mr. Waldman called it "very ironic" that the RCMP officer who originally investigated Mr. Arar is now joining forces with him. However, he said Mr. Arar welcomes Supt. Cabana's initiative. "The national interest in finding out what happened to [Mr. Arar] and who is responsible, is more important than national security confidentiality claims," Mr. Waldman said. Full story: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20050614/ARAR14/TPNational/Canada [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on June 14, 2005]

Note: http://www.theglobeandm...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Tue Jun 14, 2005 8:19 pm
    This is a secret inquiry? Its credibility just went to zero. I guess they will keep their findings secret too. When is the public enquiry?

  2. Tue Jun 14, 2005 8:41 pm
    What stood out to me was the following: "National security claims rest on two principles, she said: Preserving continuing police investigations, and <i>ensuring that revelations don't put Canada's relations with other countries at risk</i>." That would be Canada-U.S. relations in this case. Personally, I say let's hear what he has to say. Canadians deserve to know what really happened whether or not it makes the U.S. upset.<p>---<br>Now call it extreme if you like, but I propose we hit it hard, and we hit it fast, with a major, and I mean major, leaflet campaign.--Rimmer, Red Dwarf<br />

  3. Wed Jun 15, 2005 12:21 am
    I agree 100% with you on your comment!

    ---
    Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.

    Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.

  4. Wed Jun 15, 2005 1:01 am
    The inquiry is public, but RCMP and intellegence officials can opt out of testifying before a judge if the answer can compromise national security.

    Superintendent Cabana wants to spill the beans, but may not be able to because it may violate that trust.

    The findings of the inquiry will be made public.


    ---
    "If you must kill a man, it costs you nothing to be polite about it." Winston Churchill

  5. Wed Jun 15, 2005 3:52 am
    Arar hangs out with terrorists and most likely intended to be one himself. He got lucky and found a better way to screw around with the infidels - turning our own system, supported by saps, against itself.

    In any case, as a 'dual-national'(he is a Syrian citizen), any third country could deport him to either Canada, Syria or the country from which he arrived. He contacted the Canadian Embassy in Syria and they got in touch with him - exactly what they're supposed to do.

    If his countrymen in Syria tortured him - he should sue them.

  6. Wed Jun 15, 2005 4:24 am
    Perhaps we should cancel this dual citizenship thing to make sure these kinds of problems don't crop up. people can make a choice, and not a hard one at that.

  7. Wed Jun 15, 2005 9:05 am
    I honestly understand that we have to have posts from anyone no matter how ignorant but this one makes me angry. There is absolutly no evidence that he was a terrorist, none. He did not hang out with terrorists. He did not intend to be one. These are not thoughts out of an anon bigotry, these are the facts.

    And another thing, what is your definition of a terrorists, mine is certainly not anyone the americans would call a terrorist without a hell of a lot more evidence than the fool and his court's say so.

    Ah what is the use, this kind of post is beneath contempt.

    ---
    Like a great red wine at the end of a good meal or a Van Morrison song played at just the right time, proof there is a god and every once in a while she smiles.

  8. Thu Jun 16, 2005 12:04 am
    The point is that the RCMP both fingered Arar, and refused to accept his deportation to Canada.

    Canadians, as ever, refuse to take any responsibility for their own actions...



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news