Authoritarians May Be Intellectually Impaired

Posted on Saturday, July 15 at 07:55 by bracewell
Subjects in both student and juror samples who scored high in authoritarianism also made significantly more inferential errors. The data from this study strongly suggests that authoritarianism as a personality variable covaries significantly with a lessened ability of an individual to process incoming information with reasonable care and accuracy. ** THE ARTICLE ** Theodor Adorno's research on authoritarian personalities was aimed at explaining why "Good Germans" went along with the Nazis. Authoritarian personality theory may explain how someone can continue to support the corrupt. Authoritarianism is a personality trait operationally defined in terms of: 1) a high degree of compliance with socially-accepted authorities; 2) aggressiveness toward persons that is believed to be sanctioned by established authorities; 3) a high degree of adherence to social conventions believed to be favored by society and established authority (Altemeyer, 1996). The two primary instruments for measuring authoritarianism are the F-scale (Fascism) (Adorno et al., 1950) and the RWA-scale (Right-Wing Authoritarianism) (Altemeyer, 1981, 1988, 1996). Adorno pursued the twofold objective of showing that punitive child-rearing practices produced authoritarian adults and that these adults tended to hold socially conservative and discriminatory views. The F-scale sorted subjects according to nine variables including: 1) conventionalism (conformity to approved social practices): 2) authoritarian submission (compliance with authority), 3) authoritarian aggression (behavioral or 4) attitudinal aggression directed at out-groups, 5) superstition and stereotypy (belief in mystical determinants of fate & rigid categorization); 6) preoccupation with power and toughness (identify with power figures, assertion of power); 7) exaggerated concern with sexual "goings on." Although Adorno had difficulty showing correlation between parenting practices and social beliefs, he did show correlation between higher F-scale scores and both social / political conservatism and discriminatory beliefs. Stanley Milgram reported that the more compliant subjects in obedience tests scored higher the F-scale (Elms, 1972). [ For complete references and better formatting see: http://bracewell.livejournal.com/215626.html ] [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on July 17, 2006]

Note: http://bracewell.livejo...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Sat Jul 15, 2006 4:24 pm
    that you for the interesting offering <br />
    <br />
    Wilhelm Reich a onetime student of Freud who broke away from his then teacher wrote in 1946 &#8220;Listen Little Man!&#8221; a blistering attack and warning on the same mind set and tone of the authors of the actice I now reply to.<br />
    Those of us who care to dig beneath the surface of the world given us by the likes of <br />
    Freud's nephew Edward Bernaise shaped the political world as we now know it.<br />
    Harper Bush Blair and all elected politician that have been sold to us, no matter what the party they represent have been no different than the ad campaigns&#8217; that put the car you drive under you. Until this simple and devastating point is accepted nothing will change <br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewvideo.php?vid=cen_of_self1">http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewvideo.php?vid=cen_of_self1</a> <br />
    <br />
    The Century of the Self <br />
    <br />
    How politicians and business learned to create and manipulate mass-consumer society.<br />
    <br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewcommentary.php?storyid=110">http://www.lookingglassnews.org/viewcommentary.php?storyid=110</a> <br />
    <br />
    Profile: Leo Strauss, Fascist Godfather of the Neo-Cons<br />
    <p>---<br>The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.... : Albert Einstein

  2. Sat Jul 15, 2006 5:24 pm
    All ideological and religious fundamentalists are intellectually impaired, or outright crooks and predators.

    I have seen and heard them all and there's no difference between the mentalities of communist, nazi, capitalist, Christian, Muslim, Zionist etc, etc. fundamentalists.

    As we can see it on this blog in the textbook cliches from our capitalist friends. Change a few words and they could be preaching another ideology, or religion. "Communnism, national socialism, capitalism etc. was good to me, so I support it" I wish I had a buck for every time I've heard these words.

    As long as we have and force idelogically, or religion based economic theories on the world, the problems will grow and our armyguy will always have more people to shoot. Purely out of deep patriotism, or course, as are those on the other side.

    Hey armyguy, have you ever been ordered to shoot the wounded screaming their heads off between the lines, as there was no way to pick them up, or help them? I have been and not too proud of it. My NCOs and officers knew that I couldn't miss and would have shot me if I had on purpose. But it was routine in those days, bothe sides were doing it, and I never had a chance to think about it until I was lying on my back for 3 months in a hospital, as an 18 year old "war veteran". Yep, it it doesn't move, you paint it, if it moves you either salute, or shoot it.

    Ed Deak.

  3. by Deacon
    Sat Jul 15, 2006 8:02 pm
    Authoritarians are "intellectually impaired" for one and only one reason: they have voluntarily given up their single most important human right.

    They have surrendered their right to think for themselves.

    However, you can rest assured that those who will take advantage of such people are thinking of new and improved ways of exploiting them.

    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  4. by RPW
    Sun Jul 16, 2006 11:24 pm
    <blockquote>They have surrendered their right to think for themselves</blockquote> I would think they have surrendered the right to think of anyone <B>BUT</B> themselves.........<p>---<br>"It's not the people who vote that count; it's the people who count the votes." <br />
    - Joseph Stalin

  5. by Deacon
    Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:13 am
    No, I disagree.

    Anyone who can truly think for themselves realizes that while short term benefits may make being utterly selfish look appealing, the true costs of such a mindset only become apparent later on.

    Anyone who cannot, or refuses to try to, see where/how their reactions will affect themselves and others cannot, in my honest opinion, be said to truly be able to think.

    If Stellars Jays and Whiskeyjacks have that ability, what excuse do humans have beyond laziness?

    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  6. by Deacon
    Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:14 am
    "their reactions" should read as "their actions"

    my bad



    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  7. by RPW
    Mon Jul 17, 2006 2:43 pm
    <blockquote>Anyone who can truly think for themselves realizes that while short term benefits may make being utterly selfish look appealing, the true costs of such a mindset only become apparent later on.</blockquote> If people did this, then we'd all be communists (ya know....working for the betterment of society and all.....the common good........) <p>---<br>"It's not the people who vote that count; it's the people who count the votes." <br />
    - Joseph Stalin

  8. Mon Jul 17, 2006 4:13 pm
    Being Hungarian born, I didn't realize communists worked for the betterment of society and the common good, using the distorted writings of a pathetic Marx, any more than capitalists, by using the distorted writings of Adam Smith.

    Both sides are into forced collectivization under a self appointed ruling class. Only the colour of their flags and their methodology is different, but the end results are the same: brainwashed, blind servitude.

    Ed Deak.

  9. Mon Jul 17, 2006 5:12 pm
    This is actually a very interesting and timely subject.

    Some years ago I read a book by an American sociologist who discussed the issue of parents dealing with gifted children in an authoritarian way. A gifted child challenges the status quo within the family and of course the easiest way to deal with that child is to not be responsive to their gifted behavior. The parent can feel threatened by the child's intellectual talents and physical violence against the child can be a result. Authoritarianism becomes the lazy indifferent malevolant parents way out. And the child's gift may not survive or be tainted by an authoritarian upbringing.

    Similarly on a political level authoritarianism becomes the lazy shortcut to dealing with issues- rather than dealing with them you suppress, and in the suppression the issue is left to fester and be debilitating.

    Any yes there can be no doubt that many authoritarian leaders are the survivors of tainted childhoods and we live in a society that continues to give early childhood development short shrift.



    ---
    Robert Billyard

  10. by RPW
    Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:26 am
    They only called themselves communists. They didn't practice it. But then, the US calls itself "capitalist" and "democratic"...........

    ---
    "It's not the people who vote that count; it's the people who count the votes."
    - Joseph Stalin

  11. Tue Jul 18, 2006 6:01 am
    Good article. I have always thought that authoritarianism was a form of pathology, perpetuated by repressive child rearing, sexual repression and authoritarian pedagogy. Wilhelm Reich, Erich Fromm and Alice Miller are three writers who have done a lot to explore the origins of this problem

  12. by Deacon
    Tue Jul 18, 2006 7:43 pm
    "If people did this, then we'd all be communists (ya know....working for the betterment of society and all.....the common good........)"

    Funny, when I was a kid what you described was called "good citizenship" not "communism". It was taught in the Scouts, and in school, as well as other groups interested in fostering a society where people were treated fairly.

    RPW, perhaps you could "enlighten" us as to what your definition of a just and free society is?

    I for one am interested in what your POV regarding this is.



    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  13. by RPW
    Thu Jul 20, 2006 2:17 am
    <blockquote>Funny, when I was a kid what you described was called "good citizenship" not "communism". It was taught in the Scouts, and in school, as well as other groups interested in fostering a society where people were treated fairly.</blockquote> Funny how that works, isn't it? Also, the basic tenets of Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Shintoism, and just about every other kind of "ism" reflect this need for treating people "fairly". However, there seems to be a very large discrepancy between form and function. <p><i><b>"What's in a name? That which we call a rose by any other word would smell as sweet."</b></i></p> <p>---<br>"It's not the people who vote that count; it's the people who count the votes." <br />
    - Joseph Stalin



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news