Mexican Presidential Hopeful Jorge Castañeda Advocates North American Economic C

Posted on Wednesday, June 08 at 13:04 by sthompson
Castañeda, who was secretary of foreign affairs of Mexico from 2000 to 2003, made his remarks to a group of about 25 journalists and other guests of the German Marshall Fund of the United States, which hosted its annual Transatlantic Journalists Forum outside of Washington or Europe for the first time.

Organizers said the forum's focus on immigration and borders made San Antonio a prime location for discussion.

Castañeda's vision is that the three nations can strike a "grand bargain" by tackling each country's most vexing problems simultaneously.

"The central issue is that the problems we face have not been solved by NAFTA," he said.

In its current form, NAFTA hasn't worked as its architects hoped, he said.

Productivity and growth rates for Mexico have been mediocre, and contrary to U.S. hopes, illegal immigration has reached an all-time high.

"It makes sense," Castañeda said. "The Mexican economy doesn't grow, the U.S. economy does grow, and well, people leave. It's not rocket science."

Another approach would be to take the biggest current issues — such as homeland security and immigration — and try to solve them from a North American perspective, rather than one country's, he said.

So if the U.S. wants Mexico's cooperation to secure its borders from terrorists, and Mexico wants the U.S.' help to ease the flow of migrants north and south of the border, there is an incentive to work together, Castañeda argued.

"Without security, nothing is sellable to the U.S., but without immigration, nothing is sellable to Mexico," Castañeda said.

He rapped the Bush administration's lack of urgency in reforming immigration.

He characterized the American perspective like this: "The migrants who come, come; the ones who die, die; the ones who are sent back are sent back, and they try again; and, what the hell, there's no real reason for changing something which does not seem in itself to be an unmanageable situation."

There should be urgency for immigration reform because America's security is tied to it, he said.

Terrorists will come to the same conclusion that the Mexican border is the easiest way to enter the U.S.

With more integration, Americans could have a more direct hand in screening passengers in Mexico before they reach the border.

"At some point, the security question will become a central one in the United States," Castañeda said. "The Mexican border is too porous from a security perspective."

mcastillo@express-news.net

Note: www.americanpatrol.com originated with Canadia... Original article article as reposted to ...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed Jun 08, 2005 8:53 pm
    Yes, yes, that`s what we need, a common low wage zone of the Americas. Sure. This will save us all.

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  2. Wed Jun 08, 2005 9:10 pm
    <<Terrorists will come to the same conclusion that the Mexican border is the easiest way to enter the U.S.>>

    Gee, I hope none of them are reading this article.


    ---
    "When we are in the middle of the paradigm, it is hard to imagine any other paradigm" (Adam Smith).

  3. Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:14 pm
    I just wanted to add this link to give an example of the practices going on at the Mexican-US border.<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/mexico/tijuana/20050604-9999-1n4texas.html">http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/mexico/tijuana/20050604-9999-1n4texas.html</a>

  4. Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:25 pm
    The question at the end of the day is;

    Has Canada lost or will loose its sovereignty over its foreign and domestic affairs as to international trade due to its close trading relationship with the United States? That Canada can not exercise its democratic rights and move freely without fear because it has not gotten approval from and risking offending our neighbor / friend / family to the south of us. Have Canadian producers and suppliers become so tied to the high profits margins in the US that it is no longer profitable to look after Canada’s own domestic market? Do Canadians really need to give up their privacy without legal protection and recourse in US courts? Are we to integrate all of Canada's resources, military as well as political and economically with the United States to the point that we will lose control over our national resources and economical systems because we have a smaller population then the US as well as a means to support U.S. security? Will Canada in the end become to be a US protectorate and non citizens of North America with no voting rights or influence over our own destiny except for our local municipalities?

    Remember the Roman Empire with its Roman Governors that approved or disapproved the rights and will of those countries that were part of their Empire! Those same Governors that made sure that Romans will were done.

    Are Canada, Mexico and possibly the South American Nations to be the New American Empire? Made up of citizens and non citizens of the New Empire!

  5. Wed Jun 08, 2005 10:32 pm
    The empire is weakening. Yawn.

  6. Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:00 pm
    Also see; BBC production the Age of Empire - American Empire<br />
    <br />
    <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/specials/1020_ageofempire/index.shtml">http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/specials/1020_ageofempire/index.shtml</a><p>---<br>Perception is two thirds of what we perceive reality to be.<br />
    <br />
    Difficult decisions are a privilege of rank.<br />

  7. Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:03 pm
    Good thing this guy is going to lose the election to a leftist.

  8. Wed Jun 08, 2005 11:57 pm
    A few wealthy families, in Mexico especially, have been the biggest gainers under NAFTA, but the general population of the country the biggest losers in all 3 countries. The middleclass of good wage earners and small business people virtually wiped out, 70% of the people now living below poverty levels, millions of subsistence farmers forced into city shanty towns with their children living off garbage dumps. Their lands now in the hands of multinational corporations waiting for Alaskan and Canadian waters to be chanelled down. Yet this fool, and the fools in our other countries, want more of this crime wave to become more "competitive" in the race to self destruction.

    How long before the people, the politicians are hopeless mental basket cases, will wake up to the sordid fact that these free trade agreements are nothing more than licences for total exploitation and the transfer of benefits out of our countries, into the hands of a new global aristocracy reigning with the perceived power of imaginary capital ? Overall prosperity of any nation, or society, can only be achieved through strict rules to preserve the human rights of everyone, not by the enforcement of more free for all exploitation schemes.

    I hope very sincerely that politicians, who push for more in our 3 NAFTA countries, will be kicked out and that NAFTA will become a horror story of the past very soon. Yes, I am a protectionist, economic nationalist with a strong intent to help others to help themselves to a better world where everybody has a reasonable standard of living without having to fight and kill others for scraps. When WW 2 ended I was a 5'11" 18 year old, weighing 107 lbs. so I know what I'm talking about from personal experience. Ed Deak, Big Lake, BC.

  9. by N Say
    Thu Jun 09, 2005 1:48 am
    yeah but Obrador would never allow a north american community, and he's far ahead in the polls. this other guy will crash & burn

    ---
    "George Bush has declared the war on terrorism to be the cause of his generation. The cause of Canadian sovereignty will be ours." - John Godfrey, MP for Don Va

  10. Thu Jun 09, 2005 4:19 am
    all they need is some of those nifty Diebold voting machines, and viola...
    ;)

  11. Thu Jun 09, 2005 6:36 pm
    >> You can see a prime example of this kind of "anti-invasion" thinking (which to me seems pretty abhorrent)<<<

    The unbelievable hypocrisy, I can't get over the hypocrisy, the smug, lying, childish hypocrisy. "Anti-invasion" thinking? Those bigots have nothing on you. Absolutely nothing, you are soul mates Susan.

    Isn’t it funny how the US has to rely on private citizens in an effort to bolster our border patrol to stem the flood immigrants but Canada has to send out immigration officials to far flung countries in an effort to recruit them? Even still the 1.5 million visas don’t get filled and when they do there is a problem with your “new canadians” just packing up and moving south. I thought everyone hated us and loved you? More BS.

  12. Thu Jun 09, 2005 9:37 pm
    Yeah, drop the thread, hide the comment, more hypocrisy from the "progressives".

  13. Sat Jun 11, 2005 3:56 am
    A person after my own heart. We do not need the U.S.A. nor have we ever. Its the same old liberalism south of the border as it is here. Our politico's lack the intestinal fortitude to tell Bush to get lost and get rid of N.A.F.T.A. which only benefits the Roman Corporations which it serves. As we can see anyway you cut it,The creeping Communist tide is wiping out our sane laws and replacing it with jingoistic, humaninstic, Communistic ,Liberalist laws which are designed to attack our Families and our Christian way of living. We have a good Nation of people who are being fed lies to cover the real truth which is This nation was founded on Anglo-Saxon European law, common law, and the Magna Charta and is not for sale to any bidder, be it Globalist Elite, one worlder or otherwise. No racism intended. No anti religion views .



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.



Latest Editorials

more articles »

Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news