The B.C. Election: Renewal Or Suicide

Posted on Tuesday, May 24 at 16:04 by Robin Mathews
The only thing needed to confirm that suspicion was the presence of Liberal campaign hacks – CanWest journalists Norman Spector and Vaughn Palmer, suitably attired – carrying drinks and finger-foods to the Carol James table. Make no mistake. There was no victory for the NDP on election night. The election was the NDP’s to win or lose – and we know how it came out. The Gordon Campbell Liberals won a healthy majority. It is a majority sufficient to continue, unabated, the destruction of B.C. forests, the pauperization of B.C.’s elderly and vulnerable, the cover-up of bizarre wrongdoing in the ongoing, lying sale of B.C. Rail, the decimation of B.C. Ferries, the devastation of fish populations, the destruction of a fair and just legal and court system, continuation of the United Nations criticized peonization of the workforce, the privatization of B.C. Hydro, as well as the cover-up of massive Liberal Party membership fraud alleged to be connected to the raids on the legislative offices in December 2003. Gordon Campbell is a new thing – a Canadian power politician who cares absolutely nothing for ordinary Canadians or for the environment. Anyone who misunderstands him is due for a rude awakening. He is a fanatical ideologue, a corporate totalitarian, a man with a mission – to so wreck the British Columbia of history that it will not only not be retrievable but will be set up for class divisions of a kind that turn powerless people, permanently, into disposable garbage. Election postmortems are usually not very interesting. So let’s not go there. Let's look to the future. With 33 or 34 – up from 3 – seats in the B.C. legislature, the NDP can now push the face of the Liberals into the garbage heap they are making of British Columbia. Will they do it? Will they follow Winston Churchill’s dictum that the role of the Opposition is to oppose? Will they demand – as they have a perfect right to demand – that the information from the raids on the legislative offices be made public and that the search warrants involved be fully revealed to British Columbians? Will they demand, and go on demanding? Will they demand a full-dress public inquiry into the sale of B.C. Rail, the allegations of money laundering, and the Liberal Party membership rigging connected to it? Will they publicize the U.N. condemnation of Campbell Liberals’ child employment legislation, and will they demand restoration of the minimum wage? Will they do in-depth study of the B.C. Ferries fiasco, foreign shipbuilding, and the removal of B.C. Ferries from the Auditor General’s review, hounding the Campbell government on its several dishonesties in those areas? Will they see their role as both parliamentary and extra-parliamentary? With formal opposition status restored and with research funds now available, will they research and prepare to fight court battles over legislation which is very probably unconstitutional, illegal, or more: the sale of B.C. Rail, the move to privatize B.C. Hydro, the removal of B.C. Ferries administration from the Auditor General’s scrutiny, and even the fiction of “privatization” of B.C. Ferries – and much more? Finally (though there are many, many areas not mentioned here), will the NDP demand legislation to end the evil corporate media concentration in B.C. – a major factor in the NDP’s failure to win power? Or will the NDP toady to the CanWest Global monopoly, hoping for a little coverage … sometimes? That struggle, alone, is a key area in which to make an ongoing, relentless campaign. Taking a strong stand, insisting upon opening all the closets holding Campbell Liberal skeletons, fighting the monopoly press in the province, doing everything possible to prevent the Campbell Liberals from continuing with destructive legislation, and constantly outlining a better way to B.C. government – the NDP can assure that government will be theirs sooner than later. If the Carol James NDP doesn’t want to be a peoples’ party but a party happiest in the Empress Hotel ballroom, then it will not address seriously any of those issues. If the Carol James NDP wants only to be a kinder, gentler Gordon Campbell party – “New Labour,” a “Third Way” - then British Columbians will watch the Carol James NDP sink and drown in its whipped-cream view of itself, of the Campbell Liberals, and the world. The NDP – in that case – will sink, just as Francis Rattenbury’s wife sank into the Avon River after betraying her marital promises and stabbing herself in the heart. [Proofreader's note: this article was edited for spelling and typos on May 25, 2005]

Contributed By


Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. Wed May 25, 2005 3:50 am
    ...exactly my sentiments too.. These 'muddle of the
    road"...Blarite " BC" New Democrats are puddling along
    as it they 'won'...when in fact Joe & Jane BC...lost big
    time by this...this was a winnable election. Rather than
    self-congratulatory pats on the backs...the BC NDP,
    especially its members, ought to be asking, just what
    the **** went wrong...why the loss, why no 'electoral
    accord' in at least a few ridings with the Green
    'spoilers'...it was foreseen, foretold...and yet, the
    'powers' that run the BC NDP' did not due enough.
    The environment, labor, students, the poor & working
    poor, seniors, etc. etc. will take another four yeas of
    crap from Corporate BC. It is outrageous - the losers
    are the people of BC, the environment ! Thanks for
    the good article, similar sentiments expressed in Can't
    Get no Satisfaction' too.

  2. Wed May 25, 2005 4:33 am
    <a href="http://www.iceteks.com/forums/uploads/post-15-1088277268_jpg.jpg">http://www.iceteks.com/forums/uploads/post-15-1088277268_jpg.jpg</a>

  3. Wed May 25, 2005 5:59 am
    >><br />
    <a href="http://www.iceteks.com/forums/uploads/post-15-1088277268_jpg.jpg">http://www.iceteks.com/forums/uploads/post-15-1088277268_jpg.jpg</a><br />
    <br />
    Lol! Its no longer see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil anymore. (cats out of the bag) But it is still the same pack of monkeys. <br />
    <br />
    Heck, throw Cretchien in there and it would be see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil and evil. ;-D

  4. by avatar Jesse
    Wed May 25, 2005 6:28 am
    you're way off-topic, both of you. This article is about a PROVINCIAL government, not federal.

    ---
    Every time you complain about the moderators, god kills a kitten.

  5. Wed May 25, 2005 3:35 pm
    Another fine example of the benefits offered by the 'first past the post' system,<br><br>        Leading/Elected       % of Vote<br> <br> LIB        46                        46.03  <br> NDP      33                        41.27<br> GRN       -                           9.11<br> OTH       -                           2.76<br> DRBC     -                           0.84<br> Total      79                     100.00<br><br> giving B.C. a clear majority Liberal government which received less than 50% of the vote. It's reasonable to assume that at least some of the less than 50% are those who just vote Liberal because that's what they do, regardless of the platform, and those who do so because they dislike the alternatives more, rather than being ardent Liberal supporters. So, how much of B.C. actually supports the Liberal 'program'?<br><br> A PR 'seats based on percentage' house might look a bit like this:<br><br>        Leading/Elected       % of Vote<br> <br> LIB          36                     46.03  <br> NDP        32                     41.27<br> GRN          7                      9.11<br> OTH          3                      2.76<br> DRBC        1                      0.84<br> Total       79                  100.00<br><br> And people question why some might be apathetic, politically speaking?<br><br> On top of this, Robin questions whether the official opposition will do what many, or most, who voted for the NDP might likely expect them to do.<br><br> If they don't, well too bad, so sad. Try again in another four or so years.<br><br> Yes, the Canadian federal and provincial representative democracy is a wonderous creature to behold.<br><br> In terms of 'representatives', all we need any of these characters to do is what most citizens want them to do...nothing more, nothing less. <br><br> We don't need a system where a party which receives less than 50% of the votes forms a clear majority, leaving the majority of citizens 'unrepresented', viewpoint wise, in the decision making process for the life of the government. We certainly don't need a system where most, or all, qho voted are left wondering whether the party they voted for will do what citizens expected they would when casting their vote.<br><br> Come to think of it, we don't need this system at all. We need one which does what citizens expect it to do.<br><br> A more directly democratic system could be worse than this? Vive le Direct Democracy.<br><br><p>---<br>"When we are in the middle of the paradigm, it is hard to imagine any other paradigm" (Adam Smith).<br />

  6. Wed May 25, 2005 6:42 pm
    I`ve said for a while now, be it federally, or provincially, the NDP is no longer the party of the people and the disadvantaged. It must return to being Tommy Douglas` party if it is to show success again. To hell with this moderate shit!

    ---
    Dave Ruston

  7. Wed May 25, 2005 11:02 pm
    LOL The NDP were sell outs long before liberals came to power. The "Liberals" are just even more hardcore in their sell out philosophies. King Bush owns so much of our energy industry here in BC, yet that was not even an issue in the election....its just sick...

  8. Wed May 25, 2005 11:05 pm
    I mean the BC NDP specifically here, and the former Social Credit Party in BC that the evolved from, rampant corruption and selling out....

  9. Wed May 25, 2005 11:29 pm
    Ouch, Robin! Ouch, ouch, ouch!

    Couldn't we cut Carole James a bit of slack, maybe send her some
    heartfelt wishes, and give her the 100 days' grace before we start
    with our battle-axes?

  10. Wed May 25, 2005 11:39 pm
    As for the Empress Hotel, when I saw the N.D.P. celebrating in that
    venue, I too gasped ... then I said " Of course! Why not? Why the
    hell not?"

    What, did it scare people to realize that New Democrats can enjoy
    life's treats on occasion?

    I thought The Empress celebration sent a good message. I don't
    need to see New Democrats in a burnt-out warehouse or in an
    abandoned school gym to know that they care about workers and
    students and all that.

    I liked seeing New Democrats dance the light fantastic, and I
    hoped that the regal old Empress was rocking a little with them.

  11. by gina
    Thu May 26, 2005 1:13 am
    It seems to me that it is the media (right wing media) that is trying to paint the NDP with a middle of the road tag. We are hearing it over and over from them "What Carol James has to do now is show that she is capable of distancing herself from 'Big Labor' if she is ever to convince voters that she is capable of governing." Don't fall for it. I predict Carole James will be a great leader for the NDP and someday a great Premier for BC.

    ---
    gina

  12. by RPW
    Thu May 26, 2005 4:16 pm
    Tommy WAS moderate! He definitely was NOT a "fire-breathing socialist". His governance in Saskatchewan was in turn governed by simple Christian charity (which is appropo, considering he WAS a preacher).

    ---
    RickW

  13. Thu May 26, 2005 9:48 pm
    Good article by Robin, and Calumny's response is first rate. It really is the lack of democracy which allows the brown shirts to run rampant over us. If you look at polls the hard right is only a minority, they are able to get into power thru the authoritarian first-past-the-post system, which I suspect was designed purposely to exclude the true majority viewpoint.

  14. Thu May 26, 2005 9:55 pm
    RWP wrote "Tommy WAS moderate! He definitely was NOT a "fire-breathing socialist". His governance in Saskatchewan was in turn governed by simple Christian charity (which is appropo, considering he WAS a preacher)."

    This is true. Social democracy is by its very nature moderate - the achievement of a more humane and democratic system thru gradual parliamentary reform. The problem is (and I am not lumping Ms James with this, because I don't know) is that the Blairites reject even this - they merely wish to be the smily face of neoconservatism and have no real humanitarian goals. Because Tommy Douglas was honest and genuinely wished to make things better for the ordinary person, I respect him, even though I am of the "far left". I do not respect the Blairites.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news