I watched with disbelief on CNN this morning as they outlined the American solution for Fallujah. They are faced with the prospect of Urban Warfare which is something they never wanted to get involved in. CNN outlined the pure facts (wow!) that American weapons are not precise enough for precision warfare in this kind of assault, and 'civilians will be hard to distinguish'. Tanks, attack helicopters, aircraft bombing and artillery will accompany the marines in attacking the city. The deadline for compliance with surrender is today. Goodbye Fallujah.
Comments
view comments in forum
You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.
Kevin
"The greatest price of not participating in politics is being governed by your inferiors." Plato
"It is my conviction that killing under the cloak of war is nothing but an act of murder." - Albert Einstein
Yes Saddam was bad, but so are many other despots, and like so many others he was American installed and supported when he committed many of his atrocities. This does not look good on America.
America went to war with Iraq over a failed UN resolution but is close allies with Israel which ignores many, infuriating the arab world (and others).
America had the opprotunity at the start of the occupation to introduce democracy and restore basic services immediately when they still had large support in Iraq. Privatization was more important to them, which is one major reason why we are in the position they are in today.
There are many other reasons why Bush America is not appreciated (to say the least) around the world, but I would like to see how you respond to these three issues first.
As Chris Rock might say about the Iraqi fighters. I don't think they should resort to violence...but I understand.
---
If we are standing still we are moving backwards.
Never mind explaining the points of my last post. Explain this, anon you *censored*er.
children in school busses...
---
If we are standing still we are moving backwards.
"They talk about democracy while instituting a totalitarian fascist government."
Totalitarian: (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=Totalitarian)
Of, relating to, being, or imposing a form of government in which the political authority exercises absolute and centralized control over all aspects of life, the individual is subordinated to the state, and opposing political and cultural expression is suppressed: “A totalitarian regime crushes all autonomous institutions in its drive to seize the human soul” (Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr.).
Fascism: (http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=fascism)
often Fascism
A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.
A political philosophy or movement based on or advocating such a system of government.
Waiting to have elections until you can provide at least SOME form of security at the polls is neither Totalitarian nor Facist.
"Yes Saddam was bad, but so are many other despots, and like so many others he was American installed and supported when he committed many of his atrocities. This does not look good on America. "
Ok - so you are playing the old "US as hipocrite" card are you? Lets see - our foreign policy is decided by a STRING of presidents that have to leave office after 8 years. We support who it benefits us to support, and have done much more good along the way than evil - this is not an arguable fact unless you truely believe that the evil powers in the world that we have played a major roll in destroying were actually powers of good. Of course your next point might actually point to your own personal views a bit better:
"America went to war with Iraq over a failed UN resolution but is close allies with Israel which ignores many, infuriating the arab world (and others). "
Dont drag Israel into this discussion. If you want to, please educate yourself on the base principles of free society. Everyone has a right to protect themselves (and its not a requirement to even try to do it in a civil fashion as the Israelis have been for 50 years)
"America had the opprotunity at the start of the occupation to introduce democracy and restore basic services immediately when they still had large support in Iraq. Privatization was more important to them, which is one major reason why we are in the position they are in today. "
Sorry to pull this out on you, but if you dont Privatize, you risk having a government that can be both Totalitarian and Facist take power, because it OWNS all the services and businesses.
If Iraq had the long history of legitimate government that Canada has, and (hehehe) no big worries about literal criminals taking office, privatization might be less of a worry.
and above up there somewhere:
"The US is rapidly becoming an International Pariah and should be shunned by all civilized nations. "
well - guess what - we were shunned for taking on the soviet union too. Of course, we have considerable cultureal differences that come into play in this disagreement -
1) I have a job that I have to go to, because I need things like money for my mortgage, health insurance, and something to prevent me from getting extremely bored.
2) I dont like letting others live off the money I earn. I think its BS. Why should I bother earning it?
Oh it goes on and on
You say that the US does what benefits the US ( US corporations for sure) and you say the US has done a lot of good defeating evil. You don't offer any examples of this good that the USA has done, why is that?
Don't tell us who we can drag into this discussion and who we can't, we are not your colony yet buddy. The jury is still out on whether or not Israel is defending itself or practicing the new US defensive strategy which is to attack first then claim it was a defensive strike.
The US parcels out the war plunder and then you claim this was done to avoid the possibility that a totalitarian or fascist government might appropriate the resources. This must be the "new US democracy implant procedure". Take everything away from the newly democratized, just in case they think that they are entitled to do what is in their best interests with the resources that they have.
I didn't know that the US "took on the Soviet Union" or that you were shunned as a result of it. It must have been one of your hush-hush wars, eh?
The rest of your post eludes me but maybe when your government allows your job to be exported overseas you will have more time to explain your opinions.
---
Dave Ruston
Same thing goes for Najaf. If America attacks the holy sites there - they will ignite a fury they have not yet seen. But many will say that is the plan all along anyways - perpetual war for profit. Others would say the small but influential 'rapturists' among the Bush cabal want to see full out war in the entire Middle East.
For those fighting the occupation of Iraq its a win-win situation as it comes to attacking either Najaf or Fallujah. They will of course lose to the US soldiers in the end, but what it will stir up - nationalism - can not be defeated. Vietnam showed that in spades - Afghanistan showed that as well - as does Chechnya.
Osama must be sitting somewhere thanking Bush right now for giving him more recruiting material than he ever could have on his own.
Roy (keep getting logged out)