TILMA

Posted on Monday, February 05 at 17:12 by Ed Deak
http://www.canadians.org/DI/issues/TILMA/Politicians_TILMA.html So far there are only politicians who are in favour... If you feel like going on the record, please let me know and we will post it. Thanks, Carleen TILMA's Impact on Key Sectors The Trade, Investment and Labour Mobility Agreement (TILMA) was signed by BC and Alberta in April 2006. Some of the agreement's provisions will come into force on April 1, 2007 and others after a two-year transition period. TILMA sets severe restrictions on what governments can do. If governments do anything outside of the limits imposed by TILMA, they can be sued and have to pay up to $5 million. TILMA's first sentence describes it as "a comprehensive agreement on trade, investment and labour mobility that applies to all sectors of the economy". The agreement has some exceptions, but critical areas are not exempted. Having legitimate objectives will not be enough to protect governments from successful challenges. Governments will also have to demonstrate what they are doing is the least restrictive to commercial interests. The following are some examples of government programs and regulations that risk violating TILMA. Health - Restrictions on private, for-profit use of public health facilities - a violation of TILMA's prohibition of obstacles to investment - Imposition of higher standards for nursing homes - a violation of TILMA's prohibition of new regulations that restrict investment - Bans on smoking and junk food - a violation of TILMA's prohibition of obstacles to investment. Such bans would be hard to justify as the least restrictive option to meet health objectives. Education - Restrictions on private, for-profit schools - a violation of TILMA's prohibition of obstacles to investment - Requiring teachers from Alberta to take additional training to meet BC's higher certification standards - a violation of TILMA's requirement that a worker certified in one province be recognized as qualified to practice in the other without any significant additional training - Ethical purchasing policies adopted by school boards or universities - a violation of TILMA's prohibition of discriminatory procurement policies Environment - Designation of ecological reserves - a violation TILMA's prohibition of obstacles to investment - Bans introduced on pesticide spraying - a violation of TILMA's prohibition of new regulations that restrict investment - BC's Air Care program - a violation of TILMA's requirement that BC and Alberta reconcile their regulations - Restrictions on recreational development - a violation of TILMA's prohibition of obstacles to investment. Local Government - Zoning bylaws to prevent urban sprawl and height restrictions on buildings to protect views - a violation of TILMA's prohibition of obstacles to investment - Environmentally-friendly purchasing policies - a violation of TILMA's prohibition of discriminatory procurement policies - Downtown revitalization programmes providing tax waivers or other assistance to business for neighbourhood development - a violation of TILMA's prohibition of subsidies to business that distort investment decisions. Energy - Establishment of higher standards to ensure the reliability and security of the domestic electricity system - a violation of TILMA's requirement that no standards can be implemented that are incompatible with North American standards - Initiatives to give priority to meeting domestic energy needs over exports to the US - a violation of TILMA's requirement that governments promote inter-jurisdictional trade in energy - Purchasing policies of BC Hydro and the BC Transmission Corporation to promote regional economic development and to give preferences to small business - a violation of TILMA's prohibition of discriminatory procurement policies. There are a variety of ways you can get involved to educate others about its negative impacts and take action. 1) Send this email around to your friends and contacts. 2) Use this content in an email or letter to your MLA, or in a letter to the editor in your local paper. 3) Petition your City Council to pass a resolution against TILMA. Resources are available at: http://www.canadians.org/DI/issues/TILMA/index.html And http://groups.google.com/group/stoptilma Find out more about what you can do to stop TILMA by contacting the Council of Canadians in BC at 604-688-8846. Carleen Pickard BC/Yukon Regional Organizer/Council of Canadians #700- 207 W. Hastings St., Vancouver BC V6B 1H7 t. 604.688.8846/1.888.566.3888 www.canadians.org Want to learn more about TILMA and how we can join together and stop this new trade agreement? Visit: http://www.canadians.org/DI/issues/TILMA/index.html. Join the list serve - send an email to stoptilma@gmail.com Founded in 1985, the Council of Canadians is Canada's largest citizens' organization, with members and chapters across the country. If you believe that our social programs and public services should be strengthened, not privatized; that our foreign and trade policies should be independent, not subservient to the United States; and that our water and natural resources should be protected, not exploited, please join us as a member. I

Note: http://groups.google.co... http://www.canadians.or... http://www.canadians.or... http://groups.google.co... www.canadians.org http://www.canadians.or...

Contributed By



Article Rating

 (0 votes) 

Options




Comments

  1. by RPW
    Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:21 am
    I am wondering what would the "repercussions" be if the NDP won the next election and cancelled TILMA......? Nothing it seems, is written in stone for those with "fortitude".....

    ---
    "When you change the way you look at things, the things you look at change."
    -Max Planck

  2. by Deacon
    Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:30 am
    Let them "repercuss" all they like.

    The resources of BC do not belong to the Campbell Liberals, they belong to the people of British Columbia.

    We have the resources, and the means to control where they eventually end up.

    If certain parties south of the border complain too much, just tell them "ok.. if you'd don't like it, get your power from somewhere else. You have 90 days to find a new source. On day 91 we cut our exports to you by %20. If you still don't like it and refuse to talk, we cut exports by another %20 in another 60 days.." and so on.

    Those who produce have the power to force the consumers who demand their goods to negotiate IN GOOD FAITH.

    Those we export to can't afford to lose our supply, and that is what gives us the power to dictate terms.

    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  3. by Deacon
    Tue Feb 06, 2007 5:31 am
    Btw, exports EAST can be controlled with the very same ease.

    ---
    "and the knowledge they fear is a weapon to be used against them"

    "The Weapon" - Rush

  4. by avatar Milton
    Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:37 pm
    It is time to elect a government with enough guts to nullify all the fraudulent agreements entered into by the con men. Thanks for posting this Ed.

  5. Tue Feb 06, 2007 6:43 pm
    Milton.....These, "free trade agreements" are not agreements, but treaties, have little to do with trade, but with the restriction of the decision making powers of all levels of government.

    I just wrote to my NDP MLA friend, that although I don't know the Canadian side, in the USA a "treaty" must have 2/3 Senate approval, but an "agreement" doesn't. This is why the crooks are calling them "trade agreements", instead of decision restricting "treaties", because they couldn't get 2/3, only straight majority.

    Therefore, this and all "free trade" crap, should be attacked on constitutional grounds, in the courts.

    Apparently, the TILMA also has some clause wiping out the rights of any future governments to change, or elimimiate it.

    This alone is against all forms of democracy and the constitution.

    Ed Deak.

  6. by avatar Milton
    Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:26 am
    I think this agreement is entered into fraudulently. Niether of these two sycophants has a mandate to enter into any agreement of this scope, nor should any government be able to make decisions to the effect that future governments would not be able to repeal legislation, terminate agreements or abrogate treaties made by previous governments.

    I don't know what the treatment is under the Canadian constitution or contract law either.



view comments in forum


You need to be a member and be logged into the site, to comment on stories.




Your Voice

To post to the site, just sign up for a free membership/user account and then hit submit. Posts in English or French are welcome. You can email any other suggestions or comments on site content to the site editor. (Please note that Vive le Canada does not necessarily endorse the opinions or comments posted on the site.)

canadian bloggers | canadian news